Science China Chemistry

, Volume 55, Issue 12, pp 2587–2594 | Cite as

Molecular dynamics study on the relationships of modeling, structural and energy properties with sensitivity for RDX-based PBXs



In this paper, a primary model is established for MD (molecular dynamics) simulation for the PBXs (polymer-bonded explosives) with RDX (cyclotrimethylene trinitramine) as base explosive and PS as polymer binder. A series of results from the MD simulation are compared between two PBX models, which are represented by PBX1 and PBX2, respectively, including one PS molecular chain having 46 repeating units and two PS molecular chains with each having 23 repeating units. It has been found that their structural, interaction energy and mechanical properties are basically consistent between the two models. A systematic MD study for the PBX2 is performed under NPT conditions at five different temperatures, i.e., 195 K, 245 K, 295 K, 345 K, and 395 K. We have found that with the temperature increase, the maximum bond length (Lmax) of RDX N−N trigger bond increases, and the interaction energy (EN-N) between two N atoms of the N−N trigger bond and the cohesive energy density (CED) decrease. These phenomena agree with the experimental fact that the PBX becomes more sensitive as the temperature increases. Therefore, we propose to use the maximum bond length Lmax of the trigger bond of the easily decomposed and exploded component and the interaction energy EN-N of the two relevant atoms as theoretical criteria to judge or predict the relative degree of heat and impact sensitivity for the energetic composites such as PBXs and solid propellants.


RDX (cyclotrimethylene trinitramine) PBXs (polymer-bonded explosives) molecular dynamics (MD) simulation sensitivity trigger bond length interaction energy cohesive energy density (CED) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Choi CS, Prince E. The crystal structure of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine. Acta Cryst, 1972, B28: 2857–2862Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kishore K. Thermal decomposition studies on hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-s-triazine (RDX) by differential scanning calorimetry. Propell Explos Pyrotech, 1977, 2: 78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwarz RB, Hooks DE, Dick JJ, Archuleta JI, Martinez AR. Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurement of the elastic constants of cyclotrimethylene trinitramine. J Appl Phys, 2005, 98: 056106–056108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haycraft JJ, Stevens LL, Eckhardt CJ. The elastic constants and related properties of the energetic material cyclotrimethylene trinitramine (RDX) determined by Brillouin scattering. J Chem Phys, 2006, 124: 024712-1–024712-11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sorescu DC, Rice BM, Thompson DL. Intermolecular potential for the Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-s-triazine crystal (RDX): A crystal packing, Monte Carlo, and molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem, 1997, B101: 798–808Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiao JJ, Ji GF, Yang D, Xiao HM. The DFT studies on structure and property of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-2,4,6-triazine. Chin J Struct Chem, 2002, 21: 437–441Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swell TD, Bennett CM. Monte Carlo calculations of the elastic moduli and pressure-volume-temperature equation of state for hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine. J Appl Phys, 2000, 88: 88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strachan A, Kober E, van Duin ACT, Oxgaard J, Goddard III WA. Thermal decomposition of RDX from reactive molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys, 2005, 122: 054502-1–054502-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyd S, Gravelle M, Politzer P. Nonreactive molecular dynamics force field for crystalline hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5 triazine. J Chem Phys, 2006, 124: 104508-1–104508-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zheng L, Thompson DL. Molecular dynamics simulations of melting of perfect crystalline hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-s-triazine. J Chem Phys, 2006, 125: 084505-1–084505-9Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agrawal PM, Rice BM, Zheng L, Thompson DL. Molecular dynamics simulations of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-s-triazine (RDX) using a combined Sorescu-Rice-Thompson AMBER force field. J Phys Chem, 2006, B110: 26185–26188Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu W, Xiao JJ, Zhu WH, and Xiao HM. Molecular dynamics simulations of RDX and RDX-based plastic-bonded explosives. J Hazards Mater, 2009, 164: 1082–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou TT, Huang FL. Effects of defects on thermal decomposition of HMX via ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem, 2011, B115: 278–287Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiao HM, Xu XJ, Qiu L. Theoretical Design of High Energy Density Materials. Beijing: Science Press, 2008Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kamlet MJ, Adolph HG. The relationship of impact sensitivity with structure of organic high explosives. Propell Explos Pyrotech, 1979, 4: 30–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Politzer P, Abrahmsen L, Sjoberg P. Effects of amino and nitro substituents upon the electrostatic potential of an aromatic ring. J Am Chem Soc, 1984, 106: 855–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiao HM, Wang ZY, Yao JM. Quantum chemical study on sensitivity and stability of aromatic nitro explosives I. Nitro derivatives of aminobenzenes. Acta Chim Sinica, 1985, 43: 14–18Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Politzer P, Murray JS. Relationships between dissociation energies and electrostatic potentials of C-NO2 bonds: Applications to impact sensitivities. J Mol Struct, 1996, 376: 419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fan JF, Xiao HM. Theoretical study on pyrolysis and sensitivity of energetic compounds. (2) Nitro-derivatives of benzene. J Mol Struct (Theochem), 1996, 365: 225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen ZX, Xiao HM, Yang SL. Theoretical investigation on the impact sensitivity of tetrazolederivatives and their metal salts. Chem Phys, 1999, 250: 243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rice BM, Hare JJ. A quantum mechanical investigation of the relation between impact sensitivity and the charge distribution in energetic molecules. J Phys Chem, 2002, A106: 1770–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keshavarz MH. Prediction of impact sensitivity of nitroaliphatic, nitroaliphatic containing other functional groups and nitrate explosives. J Hazards Mater, 2007, 148: 648–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keshavarz MH, Jaafari M. Investigation of the various structure parameters for predicting impact sensitivity of energetic molecules via artificial neural network. Propell Explos Pyrotech, 2006, 31: 216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benazet S, Jacob G, Pepe G. GenMol(TM) supramolecular descriptors predicting reliable sensitivity of energetic compounds. Propell Explos Pyrotech, 2009, 34: 120–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang R, Jiang J, Pan Y, Cao H, Cui Y. Prediction of impact sensitivity of nitro energetic compounds by neural network based on electrotopological-state indices. J Hazards Mater, 2009, 166: 155–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiao HM, Li YF, Qian JJ. A study on sensitivity and conductivity of alkali and heavy metal azides. Acta Phys Chim Sinica, 1994, 10: 235–240Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiao HM, Li YF. Banding and electronic-structures of metal azides-sensitivity and conductivity. Science in China (Series B), 1995, 38: 538–545Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xiao HM, Li YF. Banding and Electronic Structures of Metal Azides-Sensitivity and Conductivity. Beijing: Science Press, 1996Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhu WH, Xiao HM. First-principles band gap criterion for impact sensitivity of energetic crystals: A review. Struct Chem, 2010, 21: 657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhu W, Xiao JJ, Zheng J, Zhao XB, Chen ZE, Xiao HM. A theoretical criterion for sensitivity of energetic composites-molecular dynamics studies on AP/HMX systems at various concentrations and temperatures. Acta Chim Sinica, 2008, 66: 2592–2596Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhu W, Wang XJ, Xiao JJ, Zhu WH, Sun H, Xiao HM. Molecular dynamics simulations of AP/HMX composite with a modified force field. J Hazards Mater, 2009, 167: 810–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xiao JJ, Ma XF, Zhu W, Xiao HM. Molecular dynamics simulations of polymer bonded-explosives (PBXs): Modeling, elastic properties and their dependence on temperatures and concentrations of binders. In: Proceedings of the eighth seminar “New trends in research of energetic materials”. Pardubice: The University of Pardubice, 2005. 19–21Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu XJ, Xiao HM, Xiao JJ, Zhu W, Huang H, Li JS. Molecular dynamics simulations for pure ɛ-CL-20 and ɛ -CL-20-based PBXs. J Phys Chem. 2006, B110: 7203–7207Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qiu L, Xiao HM, Zhu WH, Xiao JJ, Zhu W. Ab initio and molecular dynamics studies of crystalline TNAD (trans-1,4,5,8-tetranitro-1,4,5,8-tetraazadecalin). J Phys Chem, 2006, B110: 10651–10661Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sun H. COMPASS: An ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications — Overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J Phys Chem, 1998, B102: 7338–7364Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hwang MJ, Stockfisch TP, Hagler AT. Derivation of class II force fields: 2. Derivation and characterization of a class-II force field, CFF93, for the alkyl functional group and alkane molecules. J Am Chem Soc, 1994, 116: 2515–2525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maple JR, Hwang MJ, Stockfisch TP, Dinur U, Waldman M, Ewig CS, Hagler AT. Derivation of class-II force fields. 1. Methodology and quantum force-field for the alkyl functional group and alkane molecules. J Comput Chem, 1994, 15: 162–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lifson S, Hagler AT, Dauber P. Consistent force field studies of intermolecular forces in hydrogen-bonded crystals. 1. Carboxylic acids, amides, and the C=O…H Hydrogen bonds. J Am Chem Soc, 1979, 101: 5111–5121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Andersen HC. Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys, 1980, 72: 2384–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Parrinello M, Rahman A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys, 1981, 52: 7182–7190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Allen MP, Tildesley DJ. Computer Simulation of Liquids. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Politzer P, Murray JS, Lane P, Sjoberg P, Adolph HG. Shock-sensitivity relationships for nitramines and nitroaliphatics. Chem Phys Lett, 1991, 181:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecule and Material Computation InstituteNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and TechnologyBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Biological, Chemical Sciences and EngineeringJiaxing UniversityJiaxingChina
  4. 4.National Key Laboratory of Shock Wave and Detonation Physics, Institute of Fluid PhysicsChina Academy of Engineering PhysicsMianyangChina

Personalised recommendations