Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of daytime variations of HO2 radical concentrations in the marine boundary layer using BP network

  • Articles
  • Published:
Science China Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) was established to predict the daytime variations of HO2 radical concentration observed in the field campaign RISFEX 2003 (RIShiri Fall Experiment 2003) conducted in September 2003 at Rishiri Island (45.07 N, 141.12 E, and 35m asl) in the Sea of Japan. The initial weight matrices and bias vectors for the network were optimized by a bee evolutionary genetic algorithm (BEGA). It was found that the input variables sensitive to HO2 variation were photolysis frequency of O3 to O(1D) (J(O1D)), a composite parameter defined as the ratio of HC to NO x reactivity towards OH radicals (Φ), and the total aerosol surface area (A). The predicted results are closely correlated with the experimental data with the coefficient of determination (R 2) close to 1. In addition, the means and ranges of the predicted HO2 concentration agree with the observed data with the correlation coefficient (R), the index of agreement (IA) and the fractional bias (FB) in the range of 0.84–0.93, 0.88–0.95 and −14%–7%, respectively. This study demonstrates that BPNN is a potential tool to predict the daytime variations of HO2 radical concentrations in the marine boundary layer (MBL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George LA, Hard TM, O’Brien RJ. Measurement of free radicals OH and HO2 in Los Angeles smog. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 11643–11655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cantrell CA, Shetter RE, Calvert JG, Eisele FL, Williams E, Baumann K, Brune WH, Stevens PS. Peroxy radicals from photostationary state deviation and steady state calculations during the tropospheric OH photochemistry experiment at Idaho Hill, Colorado, 1993. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 6369–6378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carslaw N, Creasey DJ, Heard DE, Jacobs PJ, Lee JD, Lewis AC, Mcquaid JB, Pilling MJ. Eastern Atlantic Spring Experiment 1997 (EASE97) 2. Comparisons of model concentrations of OH, HO2 and RO2 with measurements. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107, 4190, doi: 10.1029/2001JD000892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Konrad S, Schmitz T, Buers HJ, Houben N, Mannschreck K, Mihelcic D, Musgen P, Patz HW, Holland F, Hofzumahaus A, Schafer HJ, Schroder S, Volz-Thomsa A, Bachmann K, Schlomski S, Moortgat G, Grobmann D. Hydrocarbon measurements at Pabst-thum during the BERLIOZ campaign and modeling of free radicals. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108, 8251, doi: 10.1029/2001JD000866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ren X, Brune WH, Cantrell CA, Edwards GD, Shirley T, Martinez M, Lesher RL. Hydroxyl and peroxy radical chemistry in a rural area of central Pennsylvania: Observations and model comparisons. Atmos Environ, 2005, 52: 231–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gardner MW, Dorling SR. Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perception)-a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ, 1998, 32: 2627–2636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boznar M, Lesjak M, Mlakar P. A neural network-based method for the short-term predictions of ambient SO2 concentrations in highly polluted industrial areas of complex terrain. Atmos Environ, 1993, 27: 221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yi J, Prybutok R. A neural network model forecasting for prediction of daily maximum ozone concentration in an industrialized urban area. Environ Pollut, 1996, 92: 349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moseholm L, Silva J, Larson T. Forecasting carbon monoxide concentrations near a sheltered intersection using video traffic surveillance and neural networks. Transportation Res, 1996, 1D: 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hooyberghsa J, Mensinka C, Dumontb G, Fierensb F, Brasseur O. A neural network forecast for daily average PM10 concentrations in Belgium. Atmos Environ, 2005, 39: 3279–3289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grivas G, Chaloulakou A. Artificial neural network models for prediction of PM10 hourly concentrations, in the Greater Area of Athens, Greece. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 1216–1229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kukkonena J, Partanena L, Karppinena A, Ruuskanenb J, Junninenb H, Kolehmainenb M, Niskab H, Dorlingc S, Chattertonc T, Foxalld R, Cawleyd G. Extensive evaluation of neural network models for the prediction of NO2 and PM10 concentrations, compared with a deterministic modelling system and measurements in central Helsinki. Atmos Environ, 2003, 37: 4539–4550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanimoto H, Kajii Y, Hirokawa J, Akimoto H, Minko N P. The atmos-pheric impact of boreal forest fires in far eastern Siberia on the seasonal variation of carbon monoxide: Observations at Rishiri, a northern remote island in Japan. Geophys Res Lett, 2000, 27: 4073–4076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanaya Y, Sadanaga Y, Hirokawa J, Kajii Y, Akimoto H. Development of a ground-based LIF instrument for measuring tropospheric HOx radi-cals: Instrumentation and calibrations. J Atmos Chem, 2001, 38: 73–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Qi B, Kanaya Y, Takami A, Hatakeyama S, Kato S, Sadanaga Y, Tanimoto H, Kajii Y. Diurnal peroxy radical chemistry at a remote coastal site over the sea of Japan. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: D17306, doi:10.1029/2006JD008236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burkert J, Hernmandez MD, Stobener D, Burrows JP, Weissenmayer M, Kraus A. Peroxy radical and related trace gas measurements in the boundary layer above the Atlantic Ocean. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106: 5457–5477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carpenter LJ, Monks PS, Galbally IE, Meyer CP, Bandy BJ, Penkett SA. A study of peroxy radicals and ozone photochemistry at coastal sites in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 25417–25427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meng W, Han XD, Hong BR. Bee evolutionary genetic algorithm. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2006, 34: 1294–1300

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peng DG, Wu YG, Jiao HF, Cao H, Zhang L, Zheng XP, Fu LX. Applications of a new genetic and simplex algorithm in optical film design and optimization. Opto-electronic Engineer, 2008, 25: 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kanaya Y, Matsumoto J, Akimoto H. Photochemical ozone production at a subtropical island of Okinawa, Japan: Implications from simultaneous observations of HO2 radical and NOx. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107: D19, doi: 10.1029/2001JD000858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sommariva R, Pilling MJ, Bloss WJ, Heard DE, Lee JD, Fleming ZL, Monks PS, Plane JMC, Saiz-Lopez A, Ball SM, Bitter M, Jones RL, Brough N, Penkett SA, Hopkins JR, Lewis AC, Read KA. Night-time radical chemistry during the NAMBLEX campaign. Atmos Chem Phys, 2007, 7: 587–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Luhar A, Patil RS. A general finite line source model for vehicular pollution dispersion. Atmos Environ, 1989, 23: 555–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Willmott C. On the validation of models. Phys Geography, 1981, 2: 183–194

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rao ST, Sistila G, Pagnotti V, Peterson WB, Irwin JS, Turner DB. Evaluation of the performance of RAM with the regional air pollution study data base. Atmos Environ, 1985, 19: 229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Qi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Z., YaShao, C., Qi, B. et al. Prediction of daytime variations of HO2 radical concentrations in the marine boundary layer using BP network. Sci. China Chem. 53, 2616–2621 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-010-4131-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-010-4131-8

Keywrds

Navigation