Skip to main content
Log in

Covariate-adaptive designs with missing covariates in clinical trials

  • Articles
  • Published:
Science China Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many covariate-adaptive randomization procedures have been proposed and implemented to balance important covariates in clinical trials. These methods are usually based on fully observed covariates. In practice, the covariates of a patient are often partially missing. We propose a novel covariate-adaptive design to deal with missing covariates and study its properties. For the proposed design, we show that as the number of patients increases, the overall imbalance, observed margin imbalance and fully observed stratum imbalance are bounded in probability. Under certain covariate-dependent missing mechanism, the proposed design can balance missing covariates as if the covariates are observed. Finally, we explore our methods and theoretical findings through simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afifi A A, Elashoff R M. Missing observations in multivariate statistics I: Review of the literature. J Amer Statist Assoc, 1966, 61: 595–604

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson T W. Maximum likelihood estimates for a multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing. J Amer Statist Assoc, 1957, 52: 200–203

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Buck S F. A method of estimation of missing values in multivariate data suitable for use with an electronic computer. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B, 1960, 22: 302–306

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dempster A P, Laird N M, Rubin D B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B, 1977, 39: 1–38

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu F, Rosenberger W F. The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu F, Zhang L, He X. Efficient randomized-adaptive designs. Ann Statist, 2009, 37: 2543–2560

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu J, Zhu H, Hu F. A unified family of covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs based on efficiency and ethics. J Amer Statist Assoc, doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.903846, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Y, Hu F. Asymptotic properties of covariate-adaptive randomization. Ann Statist, 2012, 40: 1794–1815

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalish L A, Begg C B. Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: A review. Stat Med, 1985, 4: 129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Little R J A, Rubin D B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2002

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma W, Hu F, Zhang L X. Testing hypotheses of covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials. J Amer Statist Assoc, doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.922469, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma Z, Hu F. Balancing continuous covariates based on kernel densities. Contemp Clin Trials, 2013, 34: 262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Molenberghs G, Kenward M G. Missing Data in Clinical Studies. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 2007

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Pocock S J, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics, 1975, 31: 103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pond G R, Tang P A, Welch S A, et al. Trends in the application of dynamic allocation methods in multi-arm cancer clinical trials. Clin Trials, 2010, 7: 227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenberger W F, Lachin J M. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenberger W F, Sverdlov O. Handling covariates in the design of clinical trials. Statist Sci, 2008, 23: 404–419

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin D B. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott N W, McPherson G C, Ramsay C R, et al. The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: A review. Control Clin Trials, 2002, 23: 662–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Taves D R. Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1974, 15: 443–453

    Google Scholar 

  21. Taves D R. The use of minimization in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials, 2010, 31: 180–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang L X, Hu F, Cheung S H, et al. Asymptotic properties of covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs. Ann Statist, 2007, 35: 1166–1182

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to FeiFang Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Yin, J. & Hu, F. Covariate-adaptive designs with missing covariates in clinical trials. Sci. China Math. 58, 1191–1202 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-014-4938-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-014-4938-4

Keywords

MSC(2010)

Navigation