Abstract
Lee discrepancy has been employed to measure the uniformity of fractional factorials. In this paper, we further study the statistical justification of Lee discrepancy on asymmetrical factorials. We will give an expression of the Lee discrepancy of asymmetrical factorials with two- and three-levels in terms of quadric form, present a connection between Lee discrepancy, orthogonality and minimum moment aberration, and obtain a lower bound of Lee discrepancy of asymmetrical factorials with two- and three-levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chatterjee K, Fang K T, Qin H. Uniformity in factorial designs with mixed levels. J Statist Plann Inference, 2005, 128: 593–607
Fang K T, Li R, Sudjianto A. Design and Modelling for Computer Experiments. London: Chapman and Hall, 2005
Fang K T, Ma C X, Mukerjee R. Uniformity in fractional factorials. In: Fang K T, Hickernell F J, Niederreiter H, eds. Monte Carlo and Quaai-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002, 232–241
Fang K T, Wang Y. Number-Theoretic Methods in Statistics. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1994
Hickernell F J, Liu M Q. Uniform designs limit aliasing. Biometrika, 2002, 89: 893–904
Mukerjee R, Wu C F J. On the existence of saturated and nearly saturated asymmetrical orthogonal arrays. Ann Statist, 1995, 23: 2102–2115
Xu H. Minimum moment aberration for nonregular designs and supersaturated designs. Statist Sinica, 2003, 13: 691–708
Xu H, Wu C F J. Generalized minimum aberration for asymmetrical fractional factorial designs. Ann Statist, 2001, 29: 549–560
Zhou Y D, Ning J H, Song X B. Lee discrepancy and its applications in experimental designs. Statist Probab Lett, 2008, 78: 1933–1942
Zou N, Ren P, Qin H. A note on Lee discrepancy. Statist Probab Lett, 2009, 79: 496–500
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chatterjee, K., Qin, H. & Zou, N. Lee discrepancy on asymmetrical factorials with two- and three-levels. Sci. China Math. 55, 663–670 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-012-4366-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-012-4366-2