Abstract
For the fully nonlinear uniformly elliptic equation F(D 2 u) = 0, it is well known that the viscosity solutions are C 2,α if the nonlinear operator F is convex (or concave). In this paper, we study the classical solutions for the fully nonlinear elliptic equation where the nonlinear operator F is locally C 1,β a.e. for any 0 < β < 1. We will prove that the classical solutions u are C 2,α. Moreover, the C 2,α norm of u depends on n, F and the continuous modulus of D 2 u.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caffarelli L A. Interior a priori estimates for solutions of fully nonlinear equations. Ann of Math (2), 1989, 130: 189–213
Caffarelli L A. Interior W 2,p estimates for solutions of Monge-Ampere equations. Ann of Math (2), 1990, 131: 135–150
Caffarelli L A, Cabre X. Fully Nonlinear Elliptic Equations. Amer Math Soc Colleq Publ 43. Providence, RI: Amer Math Soc, 1995
Caffarelli L A, Yuan Y. A priori estimates for solutions of fully nonlinear equations with convex level set. Indiana Univ Math J, 2000, 49: 681–695
Evans L C. Classical solutions of fully nonlinear, convex, second-order elliptic equations. Comm Pure Appl Math, 1982, 35: 333–363.
Evans L C, Gariepy R F. Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions. New York: CRC Press, 1992
Giaquinta M. Multiple Integrals in the Calculus of Variations and Nonlinear Elliptic Systems. Princeton: Princeton Univ Press, 1983
Gilbarg D, Trudinger N S. Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. 2nd ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983
Krylov N V. Boundedly nonhomogeneous elliptic and parabolic equations. Izv Akad Nak SSSR Ser Mat, 1982, 46: 487–523
Krylov N V. Boundedly nonhomogeneous elliptic and parabolic equations in a domain. Izv Akad Nak SSSR Ser Mat, 1983, 47: 75–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, Y., Li, D. & Wang, L. A priori estimates for classical solutions of fully nonlinear elliptic equations. Sci. China Math. 54, 457–462 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-010-4092-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11425-010-4092-6