Skip to main content
Log in

Finding Key Node Sets in Complex Networks Based on Improved Discrete Fireworks Algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finding out the key node sets that affect network robustness has great practical significance for network protection and network disintegration. In this paper, the problem of finding key node sets in complex networks is defined firstly. Because it is an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem, discrete fireworks algorithm is introduced to search the optimal solution, which is a swarm intelligence algorithm and is improved by the prior information of networks. To verify the effect of improved discrete fireworks algorithm (IDFA), experiments are carried out on various model networks and real power grid. Results show that the proposed IDFA is obviously superior to the benchmark algorithms, and networks suffer more damage when the key node sets obtained by IDFA are removed from the networks. The key node sets found by IDFA contain a large number of non-central nodes, which provides the authors a new perspective that the seemingly insignificant nodes may also have an important impact on the robustness of the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen G R, Wang X F, and Li X, Introduction to Complex Networks Models, Structures and Dynamics, Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cui P, Zhu P, Wang K, et al., Enhancing robustness of interdependent network by adding connectivity and dependence links, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 497: 185–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Z, Wu J, Xia Y, et al., Robustness of interdependent power grids and communication networks: A complex network perspective, IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs, 2017, 99: 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu J, Jiang Z Y, Kato N, et al., Reliability evaluation for NFV deployment of future mobile broadband networks, IEEE Wireless Communications, 2016, 23(3): 90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman L C, A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness, Sociometry, 1977, 40(1): 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stella M and Domenico M D, Distance entropy cartography characterises centrality in complex networks, Entropy, 2018, 20(4): 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borgatti S P, Centrality and network flow, Social Networks, 2005, 27(1): 55–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitsak M, Gallos L K, and Havlin S, Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks, Nature Physics, 2010, 6: 888–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brin S and Page L, The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1998, 30: 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J, Hou X, Li K, et al., A novel weight neighborhood centrality algorithm for identifying influential spreaders in complex networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2017, 475: 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang Z Y and Ma J F, Deployment of check-in nodes in complex networks, Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 40428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deng Y, Wu J, Xiao Y, et al., Efficient disintegration strategies with cost constraint in complex networks: The crucial role of nodes near average degree, Chaos, 2018, 28: 061101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y P, Tan S Y, Deng Y, et al., Attacker-defender game from a network science perspective, Chaos, 2018, 28: 051102.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Wu J, Li Y, et al., Optimal attack strategy in random scale-free networks based on incomplete information, Chinese Physics Letters, 2011, 6: 068902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng Y, Wu J, Tan Y J, Optimal attack strategy of complex networks based on tabu search, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2016, 442: 74–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma Q and Ma J, Identifying and ranking influential spreaders in complex networks with consideration of spreading probability, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2017, 465: 312–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen D, Nguyen T, Do T, et al., Probability-based multi-hop diffusion method for influence maximization in social networks, Wireless Personal Communications, 2017, 93(4): 903–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan Y and Zhu Y, Fireworks algorithm for optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, 6145: 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan Y, Fireworks Algorithm, Springer, Heidelberg, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan Y and Zheng S Q, Recent advance in fireworks algorithm, CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2014, 9(5): 516–528.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Majdouli, M A E, and Imrani A A E, Discrete fireworks algorithm for single machine scheduling problems, International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing, 2016, 7(3): 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xue J J, Wang Y, Li H, et al., Discrete fireworks algorithm for aircraft mission planning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2016, 9712: 544–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu F Z, Xiao B, Li H, et al., Discrete fireworks algorithm for clustering in wireless sensor networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2018, 10941: 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Latora V and Mauchiori M, A measure of centrality based on network efficiency, New Journal of Physics, 2007, 9(6): 188–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Erdős P and Rényi A, On the evolution of random graphs, Publications of the Mathematical Institude of the Hungarian Academy of Science, 1960, 5: 17–60.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Barabási A L and Albert R, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Goh K I, Kahng B, and Kim D, Universal behavior of load distribution in scale-free networks, Physical Review Letters, 2001, 87(27): 278701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu H L, Ma C, Xiang B B, et al., Identifying multiple influential spreaders based on generalized closeness centrality, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 492: 2237–2248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Watts D J and Strogatz S H, Collective dynamics of small-world networks, Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengzeng Liu.

Additional information

This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61502522.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor SUN Jian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, F., Xiao, B. & Li, H. Finding Key Node Sets in Complex Networks Based on Improved Discrete Fireworks Algorithm. J Syst Sci Complex 34, 1014–1027 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-9023-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-9023-1

Keywords

Navigation