Skip to main content
Log in

Vector space structure of finite evolutionary games and its application to strategy profile convergence

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A vector space structure is proposed for the set of finite games with fixed numbers of players and strategies for each players. Two statical equivalences are used to reduce the dimension of finite games. Under the vector space structure the subspaces of exact and weighted potential games are investigated. Formulas are provided to calculate them. Then the finite evolutionary games (EGs) are considered. Strategy profile dynamics is obtained using different strategy updating rules (SURs). Certain SURs, which assure the convergence of trajectories to pure Nash equilibriums, are investigated. Using the vector space structure, the projection of finite games to the subspace of exact (or weighted) potential games is considered, and a simple formula is given to calculate the projection. The convergence of near potential games to an e-equilibrium is studied. Further more, the Lyapunov function of EGs is defined and its application to the convergence of EGs is presented. Finally, the near potential function for an EG is defined, and it is proved that if the near potential function of an EG is a Lyapunov function, the EG will converge to a pure Nash equilibrium. Some examples are presented to illustrate the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith J M, Evolution and the Theorem of Games, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnov E L, The Theory of Sex Allocation, Princiton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor P and Jonker L, Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics, Math. Biosci., 1978, 16: 76–83.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Sugden R, The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare, Blackwwell, Oxford, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, et al., A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks, Nature, 2006, 441: 502–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heikkinen T, A potential game approach to distributed power control and scheduling, Computer Networks, 2006, 50: 2295–2311.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak M A and May R M, Evolutionary games and spatial chaos, Nature, 1992, 359: 826–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos F C, Santos M D, and Pacheco J M, Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games, Nature, 2008, 454: 213–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Szabo G and Toke C, Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. E, 1998, 58(1): 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzuki S and Akiyama E, Evolutionary stability of first-order-information indirect reciprocity in sizable groups, Theor. Popul. Biol., 2008, 73: 426–436.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith J M and Price G R, The logic of animal conflict, Nature, 1973, 246: 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng D, Xu T, and Qi H, Evolutionarily stable strategy of networked evolutionary games, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2014, 25(7): 1335–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gintis H, Game Theory Evolving, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2009.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fudenberg D and Levine D, The Theory of Learning in Games, MIT Press, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jordan J, Three problems in learning mixed-strategy Nash equilibria, Games Econ. Behav., 1993, 5(3): 368–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal R W, A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria, Int. J. Game Theory, 1973, 2: 65–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Blume L E, The statistical mechanics of strategic interaction, Games Econ. Behav., 1993, 5: 387–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hart S and Mas-Colell A, Potential, value, and consistency, Econometrica, 1989, 57: 589–614.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Milchtaich I, Congestion games with player-specific payoff functions, Games Econ. Behav., 1996, 13: 111–124.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Monderer D and Shapley L S, Fictitious play property for games with identical interests, J. Econ. Theory, 1996, 1: 258–265.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Monderer D and Shapley L S, Potential games, Games and Economic Behavior, 1996, 14: 124–143.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Xiao N, Wongpiromsarn T, et al., Distributed consensus in noncooperative congestion games: An application to road pricing, Proc. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Contr. Aut., Hangzhou, China, 2013, 1668–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng D, Qi H, and Zhao Y, An Introduction to Semi-tensor Product of Matrices and Its Applications, World Scientific, Singapore, 2012.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng D, Qi H, and Li Z, Analysis and Control of Boolean Networks: A Semi-tensor Product Approach, Springer, London, 2011.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Fornasini E and Valcher M E, On the periodic trajectories of Boolean control networks, Automatica, 2013, 49(5): 1506–1509.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Laschov D and Margaliot M, Controllability of Boolean control networks via the Perron-Frobenius theory, Automatica, 2012, 48(6): 1218–1223.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang L and Zhang K, L 2 stability, H control of switched homogeneous nonlinear systems and their semi-tensor product of matrices representation, Int. J. Robus. Nonli. Contr., 2013, 23: 638–652.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Zhang C, and Liu Z, A matrix approach to graph maximum stable set and coloring problems with application to multi-agent systems, Automatica, 2012, 48(7): 1227–1236.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ljung L and Söderström T, Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification, MIT Press, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Rasmusen E, Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory, 4th Ed., Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 2007.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Candogan O, Ozdaglar A, and Parrilo P A, A projection framework for near-potential games, Proc. 49th IEEE CDC, Atlanta, 2010, 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Young H P, The evolution of conventions, Econometrica, 1993, 61: 57–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Candogan O, Ozdaglar A, and Parrilo P A, Dynamics in near-potential games, Games Econ. Behav., 2013, 82: 66–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng D, On finite potential game, Automatica, 2014, 50(7): 1793–1801.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongsheng Qi.

Additional information

This research was supported partly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61273013, 61333001, 61104065, and 61374168.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor XIE Lihua.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, H., Wang, Y., Liu, T. et al. Vector space structure of finite evolutionary games and its application to strategy profile convergence. J Syst Sci Complex 29, 602–628 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-4192-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-4192-7

Keywords

Navigation