Journal of Systems Science and Complexity

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1279–1306 | Cite as

Risk management for international portfolios with basket options: A multi-stage stochastic programming approach



The authors consider the problem of active international portfolio management with basket options to achieve optimal asset allocation and combined market risk and currency risk management via multi-stage stochastic programming (MSSP). The authors note particularly the novel consideration and significant benefit of basket options in the context of portfolio optimization and risk management. Extensive empirical tests strongly demonstrate that basket options consistently have more clearly improvement on portfolio performances than a portfolio of vanilla options written on the same underlying assets. The authors further show that the MSSP model provides as a supportive tool for asset allocation, and a suitable test bed to empirically investigate the performance of alternative strategies.


Basket options options applications portfolio optimization risk management stochastic programming 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Hobson D, Laurence P, and Wang T H, Static-arbitrage upper bounds for the prices of basket options, Quantitative Finance, 2005, 5(4): 329–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Pellizzari P, Static hedging of multivariate derivatives by simulation, European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(2): 507–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Chen X, Deelstra G, Dhaene J, and Vanmaele M, Static super-replicating strategies for a class of exotic options, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2008, 42: 1067–3.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Mi H and Zhang S, Dynamic valuation of options on non-traded assets and trading strategies, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2013, 26(6): 991–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Merton R C, Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model, Journal of Economic Theory, 1971, 3: 373–3.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Samuelson P A, Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1969, 51: 239–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Fama E F, Multiperiod consumption-investment decisions, American Economic Review, 1970, 60: 163–3.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Kim T S and Omberg E, Dynamic nonmyopic portfolio behavior, Review of Financial Studies, 1996, 9: 141–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Wachter J, Portfolio and consumption decisions under mean-reverting returns: An exact solution for complete markets, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2002, 37: 63–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Brennan M J, Schwartz E S, and Lagnado R, Strategic asset allocation, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1997, 21: 1377–3.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Balduzzi P and Lynch A W, Transaction costs and predictability: Some utility cost calculations, Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 52: 47–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Brandt M W, Estimating portfolio and consumption choice: A conditional Euler equations approach, Journal of Finance, 1999, 54: 1609–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Barberis N, Investing for the long run when returns are predictable, Journal of Finance, 2000, 55: 225–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Campbell J Y and Viceira L M, Who should buy long-term bonds? American Economic Review, 1999, 91: 99–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Campbell J Y, Chan Y L, and Viceira L M, A multivariate model of strategic asset allocation, Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, 67: 41–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Dammon R M, Spatt C S, and Zhang H H, Optimal consumption and investment with capital gains taxes, Review of Financial Studies, 2001, 14: 583–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Brandt MW, Goyal A, Santa-Clara P, and Stroud J R, A simulation approach to dynamic portfolio choice with an application to learning about return predictability, Review of Financial Studies, 2005, 18(3): 831–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Klaassen P, Financial asset-pricing theory and stochastic programming models for asset/liability management: A synthesis, Management Science, 1998, 44(1): 31–4.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Gaivoronski A A, Krylov S, and Van der Wijst N, Optimal portfolio selection and dynamic benchmark tracking, European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 163(1): 115–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Abdelaziz F B, Aouni B, and Fayedh R E, Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection, European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 177(3): 1811–4.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Topaloglou N, Vladimirou H, and Zenios S A, A dynamic stochastic programming model for international portfolio management, European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185: 1501–3.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Topaloglou N, Vladimirou H, and Zenios S A, Optimizing international portfolios with options and forwards, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2011, 35(12): 3188–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Xu Y H, Li Z F, and Tan K S, Optimal investment with noise trading risk, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2008, 21(4): 519–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Zeng Y and Li Z, Asset-liability management under benchmark and mean-variance criteria in a jump diffusion market, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2011, 24(2): 317–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    He C and Meng W, Dynamic portfolio choice under the time-varying, jumps, and knight uncertainty of asset return process, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2012, 25(5): 896–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Zhang J L, Resource planning and allocation problem under uncertain environment, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2015, DOI: 10.1007/s11424-014-2183-0.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Dionne G, Gauthier G, Ouertani N, and Tahani N, Heterogeneous basket options pricing using analytical approximations, Multinational Finance Journal, 2011, 15(1–2): 47–2.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Khaliq A Q M, Voss D A, and Yousuf M, Pricing exotic options with L-stable Pad schemes, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2007, 31(11): 3438–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Flamouris D and Giamouridis D, Approximate basket option valuation for a simple jump process, Journal of Futures Markets, 2007, 27(9): 819–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Giannopoulos K, Nonparametric, conditional pricing of higher order multivariate contingent claims, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008, 32(9): 1907–4.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Bedendo M, Campolongo F, Joossens E, and Saita F, Pricing multiasset equity options: How relevant is the dependence function? Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010, 34(4): 788–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Natarajan K, Pachamanova D, and Sim M, Constructing risk measures from uncertainty sets, 2009, Operations Research, 57(5): 1129–4.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Chen W, Sim M, Sun J, and Teo C P, From CVaR to uncertainty set: Implications in joint chance-constrained optimization, Operations Research, 2010, 58(2): 470–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Rockafellar R and Uryasev S, Conditional value-at-risk for general distributions, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2002, 26(7): 1443–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Heitsch H and Römisch W, Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming, Computational Optimization and Applications, 2003, 24: 187–3.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Dupâcová J, Gröwe-Kuska N, and Römisch W, Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: An approach using probability metrics, Mathematical Programming, Series A, 2003, 95: 493–3.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Høyland K and Wallance S W, Generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems, Management Science, 2001, 47(2): 295–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Rasmussen K M and Clausen J, Mortgage loan portfolio optimization using multi-stage stochastic programming, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 31(3): 742–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Geyer A, Hanke M, and Weissensteiner A, No-arbitrage conditions, scenario trees, and multi-stage financial optimization, European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 206: 609–3.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Hochreiter R and Pflug G Ch, Financial scenario generation for stochastic multi-stage decision processes as facility location problems, Annals of Operations Research, 2007, 152(1): 257–4.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Klaassen P, Comment on “generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems”, Management Science, 2002, 48(11): 1512–4.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Sortino F and Van der Meer R, Downside risk-capturing what’s at stake in investment situations, Journal of Portfolio Management, 1991, 17(4): 27–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Grinblatt M and Titman S, Performance measurement without benchmarks: An examination of mutual fund returns, Journal of Business, 1993, 66(1): 47–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Systems Science, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of FinanceCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations