Complex concept lattices for simulating human prediction in sport
- 173 Downloads
In order to address the study of complex systems, the detection of patterns in their dynamics could play a key role in understanding their evolution. In particular, global patterns are required to detect emergent concepts and trends, some of them of a qualitative nature. Formal concept analysis (FCA) is a theory whose goal is to discover and extract knowledge from qualitative data (organized in concept lattices). In complex environments, such as sport competitions, the large amount of information currently available turns concept lattices into complex networks. The authors analyze how to apply FCA reasoning in order to increase confidence in sports predictions by means of detecting regularities from data through the management of intuitive and natural attributes extracted from publicly available information. The complexity of concept lattices -considered as networks with complex topological structure- is analyzed. It is applied to building a knowledge based system for confidence-based reasoning, which simulates how humans tend to avoid the complexity of concept networks by means of bounded reasoning skills.
Key wordsBounded rationality complex networks formal concept analysis sport forecasting
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Why Spain will win …, Engineering & Technology, 5 June–18 June 2010.Google Scholar
- Oberstone J, Differentiating the top English premier league football clubs from the rest of the pack: Identifying the keys to success, Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2009, 5(3): Article 10.Google Scholar
- Imberman S P, Domanskiand B, and Orchard R A, Using booleanized data to discover better relationships between metrics, Proc. Int. CMG Conference, 1999, 530–539.Google Scholar
- Aranda-Corral G A, Borrego-Díaz J, and Galán-Páez J, Bounded rationality for data reasoning based on formal concept analysis, Proc. Int. Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2011, 350–354.Google Scholar
- Simon H A, Models of Bounded Rationality, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar
- Andersson P, Ekman M, and Edman J, Forecasting the fast and frugal way: A study of performance and information-processing strategies of experts and non-experts when predicting the World Cup 2002 in soccer, Working Paper Series in Business Administration, 2003, 9 Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
- Aranda-Corral G A and Borrego-Díaz J, Reconciling knowledge in social tagging web services, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 6077: 383–390.Google Scholar
- Giarratano J C and Riley G D, Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, Pacific Grove, CA, 2005.Google Scholar
- Motter A E, de Moura A P S, Lai Y, and Dasgupta P, Topology of the conceptual network of language, Physical Review E, 2002, 65(6): 065102.Google Scholar
- DiFatta G, Haworth G, and Regan K, Skill rating by Bayesian inference, Proc. 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, 2009, 89–94.Google Scholar