Skip to main content
Log in

Smooth estimation of ROC curve in the presence of auxiliary information

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is often used to study and compare two-sample problems in medicine. When more information may be available on one treatment than the other, one can improve estimator of ROC curve if the auxiliary population information is taken into account. The authors show that the empirical likelihood method can be naturally adapted to make efficient use of the auxiliary information to such problems. The authors propose a smoothed empirical likelihood estimator for ROC curve with some auxiliary information in medical studies. The proposed estimates are more efficient than those ROC estimators without any auxiliary information, in the sense of comparing asymptotic variances and mean squared error (MSE). Some asymptotic properties for the empirical likelihood estimation of ROC curve are established. A simulation study is presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Swets and R. M. Pickett, Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Campbell and M. V. Ratnaparkhi, An application of Lomax distributions in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Comm. Statist., 1993, 22: 1681–1697.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. J. Goddard and I. Hinberg, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and non-normal data: An empirical study, Statist. Med., 1990, 9: 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Hsieh and B. W. Turnbull, Nonparametric and semiparametric estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve, Ann. Statist., 1996, 24: 25–40.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. C. J. Lloyd, Using smoothed received operating characteristic curves to summarize and compare diagnostic systems, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 1998, 93: 1356–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. J. Lloyd and Y. Zhou, Kernel estimators of the ROC curve are better than empirical, Statist. Probab. Lett., 1999, 44: 221–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Peng and X. Zhou, Local linear smoothing of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, J. Statist. Plann. and Infer., 2004, 118: 129–143.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Ren, X. Zhou, and H. Liang, A flexible method for estimating the ROC curve, J. Appl. Stat., 2004, 31: 773–784.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Qin and X. Zhou, Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve, Biometrics, 2006, 62: 613–622.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. L. E. Chambless and G. Diao, Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction, Statist. Med., 2006, 25: 3474–3486.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Pepe, An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures, Biometrics, 2000a, 56: 352–359.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. T. A. Alonzo and M. S. Pepe, Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques, Biostatistics, 2002, 3: 421–432.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Cai and M. S. Pepe, Semiparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis to evaluate biomarkers for disease, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 2002, 97: 1099–1107.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. Hanley and B. J. McNeil, The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology, 1982, 143: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Pepe, A regression modelling framework for receiver operating characteristic curves in medical diagnostic testing, Biometrika, 1997, 84: 595–608.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Pepe, Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results, Biometrics, 1998, 54: 124–135.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Pepe, Receiver operating characteristic Methodology, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 2000b, 95: 307–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Zhou, Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias, Biometrics, 1998, 54: 453–470.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. P. J. Heagerty and Y. L. Zheng, Survival model predicitive accuracy and ROC curves, Biometrics, 2005, 61: 92–105.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Zheng, T. Cai, and Z. Feng, Application of the time-dependent ROC curves for prognostic accuracy with multiple biomarkers, Biometrics, 2006, 62: 279–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. P. S. Albert, Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard, Biometrics, 2007, 63: 593–602.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Horváth, Z. Horváth, and W. Zhou, Confidence bands for ROC curves J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 2008, 138: 1894–1904.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Hsieh, The empirical process approach for semiparametric two-sample models with heterogeneous treatment effect, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 1995, 57: 735–748.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. G. Li, R. C. Tiwari, and M. T. Wells, Semiparametric inference for a quantile comparison function with applications to receiver operating characteristic curves, Biometrika, 1999, 86: 487–502

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. B. Owen, Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional, Biometrika, 1998, 75: 237–249.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. A. B. Owen, Empirical likelihood confidence regions, Ann. Statist., 1990, 18: 90–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Qin and J. Lawless, Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations, Ann. Statist., 1994, 22: 300–325.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Hall and R. J. Hyndman, Improved methods for bandwidth selection when estimating ROC curve, Statist. Prob. Lett., 2003, 64: 181–189.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. X. Zhou and J. Harezlek, Comparison of bandwidth selection methods for kernel smoothing of ROC curves, Statistics in Medicine, 2002, 21: 2045–2055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. P. Wand and M. C. Jones, Kernel Smoothing, Chapman and Hall, London, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Sarda, Smoothing parameter selection for smooth distribution functions, J. Statist. Plann. and Infer., 1993, 35: 65–75.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Csörgö and P. Révész, Strong Approximations in Probability and Statistics, Academic Press, New York, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Zhou.

Additional information

This research was partially supported by National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar under Grant No. 70825004 and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 10731010, the National Basic Research Program under Grant No. 2007CB814902, Creative Research Groups of China under Grant No.10721101 and Shanghai University of Finance and Economics through Project 211 Phase III and Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project under Grant No. B803.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor Guohua ZOU.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Zhou, H. & Ma, Y. Smooth estimation of ROC curve in the presence of auxiliary information. J Syst Sci Complex 24, 919–944 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-7095-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-7095-7

Key words

Navigation