Abstract
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is often used to study and compare two-sample problems in medicine. When more information may be available on one treatment than the other, one can improve estimator of ROC curve if the auxiliary population information is taken into account. The authors show that the empirical likelihood method can be naturally adapted to make efficient use of the auxiliary information to such problems. The authors propose a smoothed empirical likelihood estimator for ROC curve with some auxiliary information in medical studies. The proposed estimates are more efficient than those ROC estimators without any auxiliary information, in the sense of comparing asymptotic variances and mean squared error (MSE). Some asymptotic properties for the empirical likelihood estimation of ROC curve are established. A simulation study is presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed estimators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. A. Swets and R. M. Pickett, Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
G. Campbell and M. V. Ratnaparkhi, An application of Lomax distributions in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Comm. Statist., 1993, 22: 1681–1697.
M. J. Goddard and I. Hinberg, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and non-normal data: An empirical study, Statist. Med., 1990, 9: 325–337.
F. Hsieh and B. W. Turnbull, Nonparametric and semiparametric estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve, Ann. Statist., 1996, 24: 25–40.
C. J. Lloyd, Using smoothed received operating characteristic curves to summarize and compare diagnostic systems, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 1998, 93: 1356–1364.
C. J. Lloyd and Y. Zhou, Kernel estimators of the ROC curve are better than empirical, Statist. Probab. Lett., 1999, 44: 221–228.
L. Peng and X. Zhou, Local linear smoothing of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, J. Statist. Plann. and Infer., 2004, 118: 129–143.
H. Ren, X. Zhou, and H. Liang, A flexible method for estimating the ROC curve, J. Appl. Stat., 2004, 31: 773–784.
G. Qin and X. Zhou, Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve, Biometrics, 2006, 62: 613–622.
L. E. Chambless and G. Diao, Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction, Statist. Med., 2006, 25: 3474–3486.
M. Pepe, An interpretation for the ROC curve and inference using GLM procedures, Biometrics, 2000a, 56: 352–359.
T. A. Alonzo and M. S. Pepe, Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques, Biostatistics, 2002, 3: 421–432.
T. Cai and M. S. Pepe, Semiparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis to evaluate biomarkers for disease, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 2002, 97: 1099–1107.
J. A. Hanley and B. J. McNeil, The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology, 1982, 143: 325–337.
M. Pepe, A regression modelling framework for receiver operating characteristic curves in medical diagnostic testing, Biometrika, 1997, 84: 595–608.
M. Pepe, Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results, Biometrics, 1998, 54: 124–135.
M. Pepe, Receiver operating characteristic Methodology, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 2000b, 95: 307–311.
X. Zhou, Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias, Biometrics, 1998, 54: 453–470.
P. J. Heagerty and Y. L. Zheng, Survival model predicitive accuracy and ROC curves, Biometrics, 2005, 61: 92–105.
Y. Zheng, T. Cai, and Z. Feng, Application of the time-dependent ROC curves for prognostic accuracy with multiple biomarkers, Biometrics, 2006, 62: 279–287.
P. S. Albert, Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard, Biometrics, 2007, 63: 593–602.
L. Horváth, Z. Horváth, and W. Zhou, Confidence bands for ROC curves J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 2008, 138: 1894–1904.
F. Hsieh, The empirical process approach for semiparametric two-sample models with heterogeneous treatment effect, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 1995, 57: 735–748.
G. Li, R. C. Tiwari, and M. T. Wells, Semiparametric inference for a quantile comparison function with applications to receiver operating characteristic curves, Biometrika, 1999, 86: 487–502
A. B. Owen, Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional, Biometrika, 1998, 75: 237–249.
A. B. Owen, Empirical likelihood confidence regions, Ann. Statist., 1990, 18: 90–120.
J. Qin and J. Lawless, Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations, Ann. Statist., 1994, 22: 300–325.
P. Hall and R. J. Hyndman, Improved methods for bandwidth selection when estimating ROC curve, Statist. Prob. Lett., 2003, 64: 181–189.
X. Zhou and J. Harezlek, Comparison of bandwidth selection methods for kernel smoothing of ROC curves, Statistics in Medicine, 2002, 21: 2045–2055.
M. P. Wand and M. C. Jones, Kernel Smoothing, Chapman and Hall, London, 1995.
P. Sarda, Smoothing parameter selection for smooth distribution functions, J. Statist. Plann. and Infer., 1993, 35: 65–75.
M. Csörgö and P. Révész, Strong Approximations in Probability and Statistics, Academic Press, New York, 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was partially supported by National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar under Grant No. 70825004 and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 10731010, the National Basic Research Program under Grant No. 2007CB814902, Creative Research Groups of China under Grant No.10721101 and Shanghai University of Finance and Economics through Project 211 Phase III and Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project under Grant No. B803.
This paper was recommended for publication by Editor Guohua ZOU.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y., Zhou, H. & Ma, Y. Smooth estimation of ROC curve in the presence of auxiliary information. J Syst Sci Complex 24, 919–944 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-7095-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-7095-7