Skip to main content
Log in

A new statistical approach for the analysis of uncertain systems

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the issues of conservativeness and computational complexity of probabilistic robustness analysis. The authors solve both issues by defining a new sampling strategy and robustness measure. The new measure is shown to be much less conservative than the existing one. The new sampling strategy enables the definition of efficient hierarchical sample reuse algorithms that reduce significantly the computational complexity and make it independent of the dimension of the uncertainty space. Moreover, the authors show that there exists a one to one correspondence between the new and the existing robustness measures and provide a computationally simple algorithm to derive one from the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. W. Bai, R. Tempo, and M. Fu, Worst-case properties of the uniform distribution and randomized algorithms for robustness analysis, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 1998, 11: 183–196.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. B. R. Barmish and C. M. Lagoa, The uniform distribution: A rigorous justification for its use in robustness analysis, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 1997, 10: 203–222.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. B. R. Barmish, C. M. Lagoa, and R. Tempo, Radially truncated uniform distributions for probabilistic robustness of control systems, in Proc. of American Control Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 1997, 853–857.

  4. B. R. Barmish and P. S. Shcherbakov, On avoiding vertexization of robustness problems: The approximate feasibility concept, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2002, 42: 819–824.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Chen, K. Zhou, and J. Aravena, Fast construction of robustness degradation function, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2004, 42: 1960–1971.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Chen, K. Zhou, and J. Aravena, Fast universal algorithms for robustness analysis, in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, Hawaii, December 2003, 1926–1931.

  7. X. Chen, K. Zhou, and J. L. Aravena, Probabilistic robustness analysis—Risks, complexity, and algorithms, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2008, 47(5): 2693–2723.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Chernoff, A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952, 23: 493–507.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Doyle and G. Stein, Multivariable feedback design: Concepts for a classical/modern synthesis, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1981, 26: 4–16.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. R. R. DE Gaston and M. G. Safonov, Exact calculation of the multiloop stability margin, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 1988, 33: 156–171.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kanev, B. De Schutter, and M. Verhaegen, An ellipsoid algorithm for probabilistic robust controller design, Systems and Control Letters, 2003, 49: 365–375.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Koltchinskii, C. T. Abdallah, M. Ariola, P. Dorato, and D. Panchenko, Improved sample complexity estimates for statistical learning control of uncertain systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2000, 46: 2383–2388.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Qiu, B. Bernhardsson, A. Rantzer, E. J. Davison, P. M. Young, and J. C. Doyle, A formula for computation of the real stability radius, Automatica, 1995, 31(6): 879–890.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. R. F. Stengel and L. R. Ray, Stochastic robustness of linear time-invariant systems, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 1991, 36: 82–87.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Wang and R. F. Stengel, Robust control of nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainty, Automatica, 2002, 38: 1591–1599.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Zhou, J. C. Doyle, and K. Glover, Robust and Optimal Control, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996.

  17. T. Zhou and C. Feng, On control system design using random samples of contractive block Toeplitz matrices, International Journal of Control, 2007, 80: 624–635.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinjia Chen.

Additional information

This research is supported in part by grants from NASA (NCC5-573), LEQSF (NASA /LEQSF(2001-04)-01), the NNSFC Young Investigator Award for Overseas Collaborative Research (60328304) and a NNSFC grant (10377004).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zhou, K. & Aravena, J. A new statistical approach for the analysis of uncertain systems. J Syst Sci Complex 22, 1–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-009-9144-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-009-9144-z

Key words

Navigation