Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Dea Approach for the Resource Allocation Problem based on Scale Economies Classification

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the resource allocation problem based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) which is generally found in practice such as in public services and in production process. In management context, the resource allocation has to achieve the effective-efficient-equality aim and tries to balance the different desires of two management layers: central manager and each sector. In mathematical programming context, to solve the resource allocation asks for introducing many optimization techniques such as multiple-objective programming and goal programming. We construct an algorithm framework by using comprehensive DEA tools including CCR, BCC models, inverse DEA model, the most compromising common weights analysis model, and extra resource allocation algorithm. Returns to scale characteristic is put major place for analyzing DMUs’ scale economies and used to select DMU candidates before resource allocation. By combining extra resource allocation algorithm with scale economies target, we propose a resource allocation solution, which can achieve the effective-efficient-equality target and also provide information for future resource allocation. Many numerical examples are discussed in this paper, which also verify our work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. [1]

    A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429–444.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz, Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions, Journal of Econometrics, 1985, 30(1): 91–107.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    W. D. Cook and M. Kress, A data envelopment model fore aggregating preference ranking, Management Science, 1990, 36(11): 1302–1310.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    A. Andersen and N. C. Petersen, A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 1993, 39(10): 1261–1264.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    N. Adler, L. Friedman, and Z. Sinuany-Stern, Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context, European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140(2): 249–263.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1079–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    A. D. Athanassopoulos, Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel system, Management Science, 1998, 44(2): 173–187.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    P. Korhonen and M. Syrjanen, Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis, Management Science, 2004, 50(8): 1134–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    X. S. Zhang and J. C. Cui, A project evaluation system in the state economic information system of China–An operations research practice in public sectors, International Transactions on Operations Research, 1999, 6(5): 441–452.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    Q. L. Wei, J. Z. Zhang, and X. S. Zhang, An inverse DEA model for inputs/outputs estimate, European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 121(1): 151–163.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    Golany, An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis, Journal of Operation Research Society, 1988, 39(8): 725–734.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    Golany and E. Tamir, Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs, Management Science, 1995, 41(7): 1172–1184.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, and Kaoru Tone, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References, and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    R. D. Banker and R. M. Thrall, Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 62(1): 74–84.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    Z. H. Sheng, Q. Zhu, and G. M. Wu, DEA–Theory, Methodology and Application (in Chinese), Science Press, Beijing, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    H. Yan, Q. L. Wei, and G. Hao, DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation, European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 136(1): 19–31.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    X. S. Zhang, J. C. Cui, and X. Y. Li, Remodelling of the inverse DEA model: A prediction tool for not-for-profit organizations, Lecture Notes in Operations Research, World Publishing Corporation, Beijing, 2007, 7: 367–375.

    Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    Franklin Liu and H. H. Peng, Ranking DEA efficient units with the most compromising common weights, the 6th International Symposium on Operations Research and Its Applications (ISORA’06), 2006, 6: 219–234.

  19. [19]

    X. Y. Li and J. C. Cui, Extra resource allocation problem with the most compromise common weights based on DEA, Lecture Notes in Operations Research, ORSC&APORC, 2007, 7: 397–404.

  20. [20]

    R. G. D. Allen, Mathematical Analysis for Economists, The MacMillan Co., New York, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    C. Kao and H. T. Hung, Data envelopment analysis with common weights: The compromise solution approach, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2005, 56(11): 1196–1203.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    X. Y. Li and J. C. Cui, Arithmetic of extra resource allocation based on DEA method, Journal of Systems Engineering (in Chinese), 2007, 22(1): 57–61.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    D. Wade Cook and Moshe Kress, Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 119(3): 652–661.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    Ryuichi Ito, Takashi Namatame, and Toshikazu Yamaguchi, Resource allocation problem based on the DEA model, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 1999, 42(2): 149–166.

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinchuan CUI.

Additional information

This research is supported by 973 Program under Grant No. 2006CB701306.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LI, X., CUI, J. A Comprehensive Dea Approach for the Resource Allocation Problem based on Scale Economies Classification. J Syst Sci Complex 21, 540–557 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-008-9134-6

Download citation

Key words

  • Common weights analysis (CWA)
  • date envelopment analysis (DEA)
  • decision making unit (DMU)
  • efficiency score
  • inverse DEA model
  • multiple-objective linear programming (MOLP)
  • resource allocation problem
  • returns to scale (RTS)