Skip to main content
Log in

Seasoned scholars’ perspectives on the core competencies, programs, research, and future directions of the field of instructional design and technology

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Professional organizations and researchers in the field of instructional design and technology (IDT) have attempted to identify the competencies that IDT professionals should possess using a variety of methods, including a job announcement analysis, surveys, and interviews. While most of the previous studies identified the IDT competences based on practitioners’ perspectives or the content of job announcements or program websites, this study examined leading scholars’ perspectives on the IDT competencies, curriculum, research, and the current state and the future directions of the IDT field. Qualitative data were collected from semi-structured interviews with 21 scholars from 16 US universities who had considerable teaching experience in the IDT field. The results revealed ways to improve the IDT curriculum in addition to six core competencies for IDT professionals. Further, five themes related to research in the IDT field were identified, and seven themes related to the future directions of the field were identified. The results of the study provide faculty, researchers, and practitioners in the IDT field with unique insights on how to improve IDT programs to better prepare students for the future in this rapidly changing world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AECT Definition and Terminology Committee. (2008). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodily, R., Leary, H., & West, R. E. (2019). Research trends in instructional design and technology journals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Chellman, A. A., Ma, Z., Almeida, L. C., Gursoy, H. T., Modak, R. S., & Pastore, R. S. (2008). Citations as a key to identity in the field of instructional design technology. TechTrends, 52(3), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0157-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Dong, L., Tomita, K., & Eunkyung, M. (2016). Educational technology and instructional design in East Asia. TechTrends, 60, 525–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0112-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giberson, T. R. (2010). Performance capabilities and competencies at the undergraduate and graduate levels for performance improvement professionals. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 22(4), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. ISTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Y., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2015). A job announcement analysis of educational technology professional positions: Knowledge, skills, and abilities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(3), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515570572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., & Fox, E. J. (2004). Performance improvement competencies for instructional technologists. TechTrends, 48(2), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., & Jun, S. (2014). Skills for instructional design professionals. Performance Improvement, 53(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., & Kelly, W. Q. (2018). Competencies for instructional designers: A view from employers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2020). Project management competencies of educational technology professionals in higher education. Journal of Applied Instructional Design. https://doi.org/10.51869/93jkskadr

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2022). An overview of the competencies and career outcomes in educational technology. In J. E. Stefaniak & R. M. Reese (Eds.), The instructional design trainer’s guide (1st ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2021). Standards and competencies for instructional design and technology professionals. In J. K. McDonald & R. West E. (Eds.), Design for learning (1st ed.). EdTech Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

  • Moallem, M. (1995). Analysis of job announcements and the required competencies for instructional technology professionals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Kumar, S. (2015). Knowledge and skills needed by instructional designers In higher education. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Martin, F. (2014). Development and validation of the educational technologist multimedia competency survey. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9325-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 421–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., Martin, F., Pastore, R., & Kang, Y. (2018). Development and validation of the educational technologist competencies survey (ETCS): Knowledge, skills, and abilities. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9163-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugar, W., Hoard, B., Brown, A., & Daniels, L. (2012). Identifying multimedia production competencies and skills of instructional design and technology professionals: An Analysis of recent job postings. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.3.b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sümüer, E., Kurşun, E., & Çağıltay, K. (2006). Current major competencies for instructional design and technology professionals. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), ED-MEDIA 2006—World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia, and telecommunications. EDMEDIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Chen, Y., Ritzhaupt, A., & Martin, F. (2021). Examining competencies for the instructional design professional: An exploratory job announcement analysis. International Journal of Training and Development, 25(2), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalçın, Y., Ursavaş, Ö. F., & Klein, J. D. (2021). Measuring instructional design competencies of future professionals: Construct validity of the ibstpi® standards. Education Technology Research Development, 69, 1701–1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10006-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunjo An.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author have no conflict of interest to declare.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

N/A.

Informed consent

The participants were asked to sign the informed consent form and send the signed form to the researcher via email before interviews.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, Y. Seasoned scholars’ perspectives on the core competencies, programs, research, and future directions of the field of instructional design and technology. Education Tech Research Dev 72, 895–914 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10302-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10302-4

Keywords

Navigation