Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An analysis approach for blended learning based on weighted multiplex networks

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blended learning, as an efficient teaching mode that combines the advantages of both online and offline learning, has been widely applied in universities. Nevertheless, the different learning patterns induce difficulty in evaluating the learning quality. In this paper, an approach of integrating online and offline interactions is proposed by constructing a weighted multiplex network (WMN), in which online communication behavior and offline peer relations are represented as edges in respective network layers, and edge weight depends on the frequency of interactions. Under the framework of WMNs, learners’ attributions such as behavior, sentiment and cognition can be systematically analyzed. We use a case study to compare the differences in various indicators between the online and offline networks, and investigate the relationships between network structure and individual sentiment, cognition and grade, respectively. Results show that the correlations between network centrality and cognition or grade are significantly improved in the WMN, which demonstrate WMNs have natural advantages in the analysis of blended learning. This study provides methodological and practical implications for the analysis and understanding of learner multiple interactions, which might contribute to improving the dynamic regulation and accurate guidance of blended learning processes and optimizing existing teaching models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121, 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almaas, E., Kovács, B., Vicsek, T., Oltvai, Z. N., & Barabási, A.-L. (2004). Global organization of metabolic fluxes in the bacterium Escherichia coli. Nature, 427, 839–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artino, A. R. (2010). Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students’ choice of instructional format. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azimi-Tafreshi, N., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., & Dorogovtsev, S. N. (2014). k-core percolation on multiplex networks. Physical Review E, 90, 032816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(11), 3747–3752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, M., Gondran, B., & Guichard, E. (2003). Spatial structure of the internet traffic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 319, 633–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiston, F., Nicosia, V., & Latora, V. (2014). Structural measures for multiplex networks. Physical Review E, 89, 032804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindu, P., Thilagam, P. S., & Ahuja, D. (2017). Discovering suspicious behavior in multilayer social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 568–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., del Genio, C., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., & Zanin, M. (2014). The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Physics Reports, 544(1), 1–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D.-U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4), 175–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, J., & Brewe, E. (2013). Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and force concept inventory pretest scores. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9, 020109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K.-H., & Hou, H.-T. (2013). Exploring students’ behavioural patterns during online peer assessment from the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive perspectives: A progressive sequential analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a cscl community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, T.-L.D., Johnson, O., Hall-Phillips, A., & Kim, K. (2021). The effects of offline events on online connective actions: An examination of #boycottnfl using social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dado, M., & Bodemer, D. (2017). A review of methodological applications of social network analysis in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 22, 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico, M., Solé-Ribalta, A., Cozzo, E., Kivelä, M., Moreno, Y., Porter, M. A., & Arenas, A. (2013). Mathematical formulation of multilayer networks. Physical Review X, 3, 041022.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Domenico, M., Solé-Ribalta, A., Omodei, E., Gómez, S., & Arenas, A. (2015). Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes. Nature Communications, 6, 6868.

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Marcos, L., Domýnguez, A., de Navarrete, J. S., & Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education, 75, 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Marcos, L., Garcýa-López, E., Garcýa-Cabot, A., Medina-Merodio, J.-A., Domýnguez, A., Martýnez-Herráiz, J.-J., & Diez-Folledo, T. (2016). Social network analysis of a gamified e-learning course: Small-world phenomenon and network metrics as predictors of academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. C., Lajoie, S. P., Pekrun, R., & Lachapelle, K. (2020). Emotions in medical education: Examining the validity of the medical emotion scale (mes) across authentic medical learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 236–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, K. R., Silk, M. J., Porter, M. A., & Pinter-Wollman, N. (2019). The use of multilayer network analysis in animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 149, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaggioli, A., Mazzoni, E., Milani, L., & Riva, G. (2015). The creative link: Investigating the relationship between social network indices, creative performance and flow in blended teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gašević, D., Zouaq, A., & Janzen, R. (2013). “Choose Your Classmates, Your GPA Is at Stake!’’: The association of cross-class social ties and academic performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1460–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giulia, M., Daniel, R., Pietro, P., Mondragón, R., Ginestra, B., & Yamir, M. (2014). Weighted multiplex networks. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e97857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Social networks (pp. 347–367). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Science Research, 18(4), 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggars, S. S., & Bailey, T. (2010). Effectiveness of fully online courses for college students: Response to a department of education meta-analysis (p. 18). Columbia University, Community College Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joksimović, S., Manataki, A., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Kovanović, V., & de Kereki, I. F. (2016). Translating network position into performance: Importance of centrality in different network configurations (pp. 314–323). Association for Computing Machinery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, O. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 15(5), 263–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, H. F., Ponton, M. K., & Rovai, A. P. (2007). A comparison of student evaluations of teaching between online and face-to-face courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(2), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014). Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 2(3), 203–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Social network analysis of peer relationships and online interactions in a blended class using blogs. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Reich, J. (2020). Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarov, V. V., Zhuravlev, M. O., Runnova, A. E., Protasov, P., Maksimenko, V. A., Frolov, N. S., & Hramov, A. E. (2018). Betweenness centrality in multiplex brain network during mental task evaluation. Physical Review E, 98, 062413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menichetti, G., Remondini, D., & Bianconi, G. (2014). Correlations between weights and overlap in ensembles of weighted multiplex networks. Physical Review E, 90, 062817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespýn-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murase, Y., Török, J., Jo, H.-H., Kaski, K., & Kertész, J. (2014). Multilayer weighted social network model. Physical Review E, 90, 052810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, C. S. L., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2012). Peer facilitation techniques. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 280–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., & Barabási, A.-L. (2007). Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(18), 7332–7336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paechter, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 292–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J., Zheng, Q., & Li, H. (2014). A study of learner-oriented negative emotion compensation in e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17, 420–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, T. C., & Koesten, J. (2005). Prestige, centrality, and learning: A social network analysis of an online class. Communication Education, 54(3), 254–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, H., & Gu, X. (2018). Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student-group interactions in a blended learning course. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadtfeld, C., Vörös, A., Elmer, T., Boda, Z., & Raabe, I. J. (2019). Integration in emerging social networks explains academic failure and success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(3), 792–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steeples, C., & Jones, C. (Eds.). (2002). Issues for democracy and social identity in computer mediated communication and networked learning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ta-Chu, K., & Porter, M. A. (2018). Layer communities in multiplex networks. Journal of Statistical Physics, 173(3), 1286–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Yang, D., Wen, M., Koedinger, K. R., & Rosé, C. P. (2015). Investigating how student’s cognitive behavior in MOOC discussion forum affect learning gains. In Santos, O. C. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining, EDM 2015, Madrid, Spain, June 26–29, 2015 (pp. 226–233). International Educational Data Mining Society (IEDMS).

  • Wang Zhen, S. A., Lin, W., & Matjaž, P. (2015). Evolutionary games on multilayer networks: A colloquium. The European Physical Journal B, 88, 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., & Cui, Y. (2018). Learning communities in the crowd: Characteristics of content related interactions and social relationships in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 122, 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, K., Di Tosto, G., Lu, L., & Cho, Y. S. (2018). Detecting leadership in peermoderated online collaborative learning through text mining and social network analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X., Zhai, L., & Fan, W. (2013). C-index: A weighted network node centrality measure for collaboration competence. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, L., Yan, X., & Zhang, G. (2013). A centrality measure for communication ability in weighted network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 392(23), 6107–6117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Ma, J., Su, X., Tian, H., Wang, W., & Cai, S. (2019). Information spreading on weighted multiplex social network. Complexity, 2019, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62007012, 62293552, 61937001, 61977030, 62077017), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. CCNU22LJ005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Engineering Research Center for Educational Big Data, Central China Normal University, Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China

    Zhu Su, Yue Li, Zhi Liu, Jianwen Sun, Zongkai Yang & Sannyuya Liu

  2. National Engineering Research Center for E-Learning, Central China Normal University, Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China

    Zongkai Yang & Sannyuya Liu

  3. Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China

    Zhu Su, Yue Li, Zhi Liu, Jianwen Sun, Zongkai Yang & Sannyuya Liu

Authors
  1. Zhu Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianwen Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zongkai Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sannyuya Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sannyuya Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human/animals participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board (IRB) from Central China Normal University. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, Z., Li, Y., Liu, Z. et al. An analysis approach for blended learning based on weighted multiplex networks. Education Tech Research Dev 71, 1941–1963 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10266-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10266-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation