Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) provides an immersive and engaging experience that facilitates the teaching and learning of abstract concepts. This paper describes the design and implementation of the VR 360° (VR360) component of the Virtual and Augmented Reality for Structures (VARS) mobile application. This study used VARS to teach basic structural systems to 109 project and facilities management undergraduates. Based on a questionnaire survey, most students agreed that VARS VR360 helped them achieve learning outcomes. Furthermore, the study found that physics background and cybersickness did not influence the perceived effectiveness of the application, but authentic context and immersiveness are important design elements. The contributions of this paper are threefold: (1) the development of a VR360 mobile application for teaching basic structural systems concepts to non-engineering students; (2) the demonstration of how VR360 can be an effective medium for improving the teaching of structural systems to non-engineering students; (3) the identification of critical design elements and factors that influence the perceived effectiveness of VR360 educational technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Abulrub, A. G., Attridge, A. N., & Williams, M. A. (2011). Virtual reality in engineering education: The future of creative learning. 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773223
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications Inc.
Barber, W., King, S., & Buchanan, S. (2015). Problem based learning and authentic assessment in digital pedagogy: Embracing the role of collaborative communities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(2), 59–67.
Bell, T., Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., & Vargo, J. (2001). Digital lectures: if you make them, will students use them? Constraints on effective delivery of flexible learning systems. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning. Retrieved from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2001/2/06/index.asp
Bligh, D. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures? (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up: Digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380009601719
Campbell, K., Diffley, J., Flanagan, B., Morelli, B., O’Neil, B., & Sideco, F. (2017). The 5G economy: How 5G technology will contribute to the global economy. In IHS economics and IHS technology. qualcomm technologies (pp. 1–32). Retrieved from https://cdn.ihs.com/www/pdf/IHS-Technology-5G-Economic-Impact-Study.pdf
Chen, C.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-H. (2014). A progressive prompting approach to conducting context-aware learning activities for natural science courses. Interacting with Computers, 26(4), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu004
Cheng, S., Hwang, G., & Chen, C. (2019). From reflective observation to active learning: A mobile experiential learning approach for environmental science education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2251–2270. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12845
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
Cimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71.
Cole, J. S., & Spence, S. W. T. (2012). Using continuous assessment to promote student engagement in a large class. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.719002
Cook, A. E., Limber, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2001). Situation-based context and the availability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2744
De Amicis, R., Riggio, M., Shahbaz Badr, A., Fick, J., Sanchez, C. A., & Prather, E. A. (2019). Cross-reality environments in smart buildings to advance STEM cyberlearning. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(1), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00546-x
DiPiro, J. T. (2009). Why do we still lecture? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(8), 137. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7308137
Duderstadt, J. J., Atkins, D. E., & Houweling, D. E. (2002). Higher education in the digital age: Technology issues and strategies for American colleges and universities. Greenwood Press.
Ejiwale, J. A. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of stem education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 7(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i2.220
Fabola, A., Miller, A., & Fawcett, R. (2015). Exploring the past with Google cardboard. 2015 digital heritage (pp. 277–284). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7413882
Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Glowatz, M., Mangina, E., & Holland, D. (2017). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality technology based simulations in higher education: Opportunities for alternative assessment strategies. Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173519.3173529
Greuter, L., Rosa, A., Cattin, P., Croci, D. M., Soleman, J., & Guzman, R. (2021). Randomized study comparing 3D virtual reality and conventional 2D on-screen teaching of cerebrovascular anatomy. Neurosurgical Focus, 51(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21212
Hacisalihoglu, G., Stephens, D., Johnson, L., & Edington, M. (2018). The use of an active learning approach in a SCALE-UP learning space improves academic performance in undergraduate General Biology. PLoS ONE, 13(5), 0197916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197916
Häfner, P., Häfner, V., & Ovtcharova, J. (2013). Teaching methodology for virtual reality practical course in engineering education. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.031
Hansen, E. J., & Stephens, J. A. (2000). The ethics of learner-centered education: Dynamics that impede the process. Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(5), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380009605739
Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2019). Virtual reality laboratories: A review of experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(3), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00558-7
Hickman, L., & Akdere, M. (2017). Exploring virtual reality for developing soft-skills in stem education. 7th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF.2017.8467037
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, J.-C., Lin, C.-Y., Zhuo, P.-W., & Lin, K.-Y. (2019). Using 3D printing technology with experiential learning strategies to improve preengineering students’ comprehension of abstract scientific concepts and hands-on ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12319
Hu, X., Goh, Y. M., & Lin, A. (2021). Educational impact of an augmented reality (AR) application for teaching structural systems to non-engineering students. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 50, 101436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101436
Izard, S. G., Juanes Méndez, J. A., & Palomera, P. R. (2017). Virtual reality educational tool for human anatomy. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(5), 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0723-6
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x
Kamińska, D., Zwoliński, G., Wiak, S., Petkovska, L., Cvetkovski, G., Barba, P. D., Mognaschi, M. E., Haamer, R. E., & Anbarjafari, G. (2021). Virtual reality-based training: Case study in mechatronics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09469-z
Kaptan, K., & Timurlenk, O. (2012). Challenges for science education. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.237
Kelly, P. A., Haidet, P., Schneider, V., Searle, N., Seidel, C. L., & Richards, B. F. (2005). A comparison of in-class learner engagement across lecture, problem-based learning, and team learning using the strobe classroom observation tool. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_4
Koulieris, G.-A., Bui, B., Banks, M. S., & Drettakis, G. (2017). Accommodation and comfort in head-mounted displays. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073622
LaViola, J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 32(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344
Lee, J., Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2017). A study on immersion and VR sickness in walking interaction for immersive virtual reality applications. Symmetry, 9(5), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9050078
Lee, Y. Y. R., Samad, H., & Miang Goh, Y. (2020). Perceived importance of authentic learning factors in designing construction safety simulation game-based assignment: Random forest approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), 04020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001779
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2019). Investigating the process of learning with desktop virtual reality: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 134, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.002
Marmah, A. A. (2014). Students’ perception about the lecture as a method of teaching in tertiary institutions: Views of students from college of technology education, Kumasi (Coltek). International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6), 601–612.
Matveev, A. V., & Milter, R. G. (2010). An implementation of active learning: Assessing the effectiveness of the team infomercial assignment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703291003718935
McCombs, B. L. (1991). Motivation and lifelong learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2602_4
Meester, J., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Buyse, M.-P., Ceuppens, S., Cock, M., Loof, H., Goovaerts, L., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Struyf, A., Thibaut, L., Velde, D., Petegem, P., & Dehaene, W. (2020). Bridging the gap between secondary and higher stem education—The case of stem@school. European Review, 28(S1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798720000964
NUS SaRRU. (2021). VARS—Department of the Built Environment. National University of Singapore. Retrieved 22 Dec from https://cde.nus.edu.sg/dbe/cpfm/sarru/
Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241
Passig, D., Tzuriel, D., & Eshel-Kedmi, G. (2016). Improving children’s cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D Immersive Virtual Reality environments. Computers & Education, 95, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.009
Reason, J. (1978). Motion sickness: Some theoretical and practical considerations. Applied Ergonomics, 9(3), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(78)90008-X
Rebenitsch, L., & Owen, C. (2014). Individual variation in susceptibility to cybersickness. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647394
Renganayagalu, S. K., Mallam, S. C., & Nazir, S. (2021). Effectiveness of VR head mounted displays in professional training: A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 999–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09489-9
Riccio, G. E., & Stoffregen, T. A. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 3(3), 195–240. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0303_2
Sabalic, M., & Schoener, J. D. (2017). Virtual reality-based technologies in dental medicine: Knowledge, attitudes and practice among students and practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9305-4
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136
Schmidt, H. G., Wagener, S. L., Smeets, G. A. C. M., Keemink, L. M., & Molen, H. T. (2015). On the use and misuse of lectures in higher education. Health Professions Education, 1(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2015.11.010
Seymour, N. E., Gallagher, A. G., Roman, S. A., O’Brien, M. K., Bansal, V. K., Andersen, D. K., & Satava, R. M. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery, 236(4), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
Shahriari-Rad, A., Cox, M., & Woolford, M. (2017). Clinical skills acquisition: Rethinking assessment using a virtual haptic simulator. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9308-1
Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
Slater, M. (2017). Implicit learning through embodiment in immersive virtual reality. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, Augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 19–33). Springer.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Hanley, P., & Thurston, A. (2014). Experimental evaluations of elementary science programs: A best-evidence synthesis: Experimental evaluations of elementary science programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 870–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21139
Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157
Steinicke, F. (2016). Being really virtual. Springer International Publishing.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tanaka, N., & Takagi, H. (2004). Virtual reality environment design of managing both presence and virtual reality sickness. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 23(6), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa.23.313
V.I.A.R. (2017). Getting rid of double vision on google cardboard? Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@viarbox/getting-rid-of-double-vision-on-google-cardboard-6fa9b22da720
Veermans, K., & Jaakkola, T. (2019). Pedagogy in educational simulations and games. In Y. Cai, W. Joolingen, & Z. Walker (Eds.), VR, simulations and serious games for education (pp. 5–14). Springer.
Vituccio, R., Cho, J., Tsai, T.-Y., & Boak, S. (2018). Creating compelling virtual reality and interactive content for higher education: A case study with Carnegie Mellon University. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Educator’s forum (pp. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3215641.3215647
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0062-1
Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.2190/FLHV-K4WA-WPVQ-H0YM
Yang, F., & Goh, Y. M. (2022). VR and MR technology for safety management education: An authentic learning approach. Safety Science, 148, 105645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105645
Yang, Y., Guo, X., Yu, Z., Steiner, K. V., Barner, K. E., Bauer, T. L., & Yu, J. (2014). An immersive surgery training system with live streaming capability. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 196, 479–485.
Acknowledgements
The contributions of Mr John Yap and his team and Dr Seo Hong Lim are acknowledged and greatly appreciated.
Funding
This study is funded by the NUS Learning Innovation Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, X., Safiena, S., Goh, Y.M. et al. Using virtual reality (VR) to improve structural systems knowledge of project and facilities management students. Education Tech Research Dev 71, 1993–2019 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10251-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10251-y