Skip to main content
Log in

A concept mapping-based prediction-observation-explanation approach to promoting students’ flipped learning achievements and perceptions

  • Cultural and Regional Perspectives
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has illustrated the potential of flipped learning for assisting teachers in designing meaningful activities to promote students’ higher order thinking skills; however, several previous studies have challenged the effects of flipped learning on students’ learning. One of the key problems is the lack of an effective learning approach or tools to engage students in the flipped learning activity. In this study, a concept mapping-based Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) approach was incorporated into flipped learning (called CPOE-FL) to enhance students’ scientific learning. Furthermore, a three-group experiment was conducted to assess the effects of the three flipped learning models, comprising the CPOE-FL approach, the POE-FL (incorporating POE into flipped learning) approach, and the C-FL (conventional flipped learning) approach. The experimental results displayed that the CPOE-FL approach can benefit the learning achievements and self-efficacy of the students with respectively lower prior knowledge and lower initial self-efficacy, in comparison with the POE-FL and C-FL approaches. Both the CPOE-FL and POE-FL approaches promoted the students’ inner learning motivation, while the CPOE-FL approach enhanced the students’ critical thinking. This proposed approach could provide a good reference for researchers or school teachers intending to implement POE-based flipped learning in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a Physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1589–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. C. Y., Hwang, G. J., Lin, Y. Y., Yu, S. J., Pan, L. C., & Chen, A. Y. Z. (2018). A votable concept mapping approach to promoting students’ attentional behavior: An analysis of sequential behavioral patterns and brainwave data. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 177–191.

  • Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Effects of a concept mapping‐based flipped learning approach on EFL students’ English speaking performance, critical thinking awareness and speaking anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 817–834.

  • Banawi, A., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., & Solehuddin, M. (2019). Prospective primary school teachers’ conception change on states of matter and their changes through predict-observe-explain strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, K. A., & Lumpe, A. (2008). Student use of scaffolding software: Relationships with motivation and conceptual understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çakiroğlu, Ü., Güven, O., & Saylan, E. (2020). Flipping the experimentation process: Influences on science process skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3425–3448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charsky, D., & Ressler, W. (2011). “Games are made for fun”: Lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games. Computers & Education, 56(3), 604–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., & Al Muhdhar, M. H. I. (2020). The effects of integrated problem-based learning, predict, observe, explain on problem-solving skills and self-efficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, P. J., Aram, R., & Burke, G. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmeyer, R., Stevenson, M. P., & Bentsen, P. (2018). A systematic review of concept mapping-based formative assessment processes in primary and secondary science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 598–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An exploration of students’ science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, H. S., Hong, J. C., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A five-stage prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to improve students’ learning performance in science courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3393–3416

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2011). Facilitating preschoolers’ scientific knowledge construction via computer games regarding light and shadow: The effect of the prediction-observation-explanation (POE) strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C. (2019). Using a concept mapping strategy to improve the motivation of EFL students in Google Hangouts Peer-Tutoring Sessions with native speakers. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 272–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C., Li, J. T., Govaerts, S., & Gillet, D. (2017). The perceptions of using instant interaction applications for enhancing peer discussion in a flipped classroom. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., & Crawford, T. (2000). Experiments, contingencies, and curriculum: Providing opportunities for learning through improvisation in science teaching. Science Education, 84(5), 624–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liou, W. K., Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Beyond the flipped classroom: A highly interactive cloud-classroom (HIC) embedded into basic materials science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Sun, D., & Xie, W. (2015). Exploring students’ progression in an inquiry science curriculum enabled by mobile learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveys, B. R., & Riggs, K. M. (2019). Flipping the laboratory: Improving student engagement and learning outcomes in second year science courses. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 64–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, H., Yang, T., Xue, J., & Zuo, M. (2019). Impact of student agency on learning performance and learning experience in a flipped classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 819–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgado, J., Otero, J., Vaz-Rebelo, P., Sanjosé, V., & Caldeira, H. (2014). Detection of explanation obstacles in scientific texts: the effect of an understanding task vs. an experiment task. Educational Studies, 40(2), 164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1990a). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1990b). Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (1995). The POE in the primary school: An evaluation. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, X., Jin, Y., Zheng, T., & Zhao, J. (2020). Longitudinal effect of a technology-enhanced learning environment on sixth-grade students’ science learning: the role of reflection. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning

  • Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S. P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Sesen, B. A. (2013). Diagnosing pre-service science teachers’ understanding of chemistry concepts by using computer-mediated predict-observe-explain tasks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D., Karimi, A., & Kim, P. (2016). A remotely operated science experiment framework for under-resourced schools. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 1706–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srisawasdi, N., Feungchan, W., Meuansechai, K., Kongpet, K., & Panjaburee, P. (2016). The study on integrating visualised simulation into context-aware ubiquitous learning activities for elementary science education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(4), 263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. C. (2019). Learning with computers: Generating insights into the development of cognitive tools using cultural historical activity theory. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, S. S. (2020). Using concept mapping activities to enhance students’ critical thinking skills at a high school in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, J. Y. (2009). The impact of general and specific performance and self-efficacy on learning with computer-based concept mapping. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 989–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbančič, M., & Glažar, S. A. (2012). Impact of experiments on 13-year-old pupils’ understanding of selected science concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the usability of learning analytics reports in a flipped university course: when and how does information become actionable knowledge? Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1043–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Riesen, S. A., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference-matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. H. (2016). Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 391–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Huang, X., Schunn, C. D., Zou, Y., & Ai, W. (2019). Redesigning flipped classrooms: A learning model and its effects on student perceptions. Higher Education, 78, 711–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. K., Pelkey, J., Noyes, C. R., & Rodgers, M. O. (2016). Assessing conceptual knowledge using three concept map scoring methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 118–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2015). Assessing changes in high school students’ conceptual understanding through concept maps before and after the computer-based predict-observe-explain (CB-POE) tasks on acid–base chemistry at the secondary level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 843–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, X. D., Chang, Y. H., & Lai, C. L. (2019). An interactive problem-posing guiding approach to bridging and facilitating pre-and in-class learning for flipped classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1075–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under contract number MOST-109-2511-H-011-002-MY3. There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Hung Chen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, GJ., Chen, CH. & Chen, WH. A concept mapping-based prediction-observation-explanation approach to promoting students’ flipped learning achievements and perceptions. Education Tech Research Dev 70, 1497–1516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10106-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10106-y

Keywords

Navigation