Abstract
Previous research has illustrated the potential of flipped learning for assisting teachers in designing meaningful activities to promote students’ higher order thinking skills; however, several previous studies have challenged the effects of flipped learning on students’ learning. One of the key problems is the lack of an effective learning approach or tools to engage students in the flipped learning activity. In this study, a concept mapping-based Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) approach was incorporated into flipped learning (called CPOE-FL) to enhance students’ scientific learning. Furthermore, a three-group experiment was conducted to assess the effects of the three flipped learning models, comprising the CPOE-FL approach, the POE-FL (incorporating POE into flipped learning) approach, and the C-FL (conventional flipped learning) approach. The experimental results displayed that the CPOE-FL approach can benefit the learning achievements and self-efficacy of the students with respectively lower prior knowledge and lower initial self-efficacy, in comparison with the POE-FL and C-FL approaches. Both the CPOE-FL and POE-FL approaches promoted the students’ inner learning motivation, while the CPOE-FL approach enhanced the students’ critical thinking. This proposed approach could provide a good reference for researchers or school teachers intending to implement POE-based flipped learning in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695
Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a Physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1589–1603
Sun, J. C. Y., Hwang, G. J., Lin, Y. Y., Yu, S. J., Pan, L. C., & Chen, A. Y. Z. (2018). A votable concept mapping approach to promoting students’ attentional behavior: An analysis of sequential behavioral patterns and brainwave data. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 177–191.
Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Effects of a concept mapping‐based flipped learning approach on EFL students’ English speaking performance, critical thinking awareness and speaking anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 817–834.
Banawi, A., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., & Solehuddin, M. (2019). Prospective primary school teachers’ conception change on states of matter and their changes through predict-observe-explain strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 359–374
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education
Butler, K. A., & Lumpe, A. (2008). Student use of scaffolding software: Relationships with motivation and conceptual understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 427–436
Çakiroğlu, Ü., Güven, O., & Saylan, E. (2020). Flipping the experimentation process: Influences on science process skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3425–3448
Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-first-century learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(3), 389–398
Charsky, D., & Ressler, W. (2011). “Games are made for fun”: Lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games. Computers & Education, 56(3), 604–615
Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096–1112
Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248–263
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., & Al Muhdhar, M. H. I. (2020). The effects of integrated problem-based learning, predict, observe, explain on problem-solving skills and self-efficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(85), 45–64
Germann, P. J., Aram, R., & Burke, G. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skill of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 79–99
Hartmeyer, R., Stevenson, M. P., & Bentsen, P. (2018). A systematic review of concept mapping-based formative assessment processes in primary and secondary science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 598–619
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An exploration of students’ science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193–1212
Hsiao, H. S., Hong, J. C., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2017). A five-stage prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to improve students’ learning performance in science courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3393–3416
Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2011). Facilitating preschoolers’ scientific knowledge construction via computer games regarding light and shadow: The effect of the prediction-observation-explanation (POE) strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 482–493
Hsu, T. C. (2019). Using a concept mapping strategy to improve the motivation of EFL students in Google Hangouts Peer-Tutoring Sessions with native speakers. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 272–285
Hsu, T. C., Li, J. T., Govaerts, S., & Gillet, D. (2017). The perceptions of using instant interaction applications for enhancing peer discussion in a flipped classroom. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(1), 1–14
Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., & Crawford, T. (2000). Experiments, contingencies, and curriculum: Providing opportunities for learning through improvisation in science teaching. Science Education, 84(5), 624–657
Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16–31
Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945
Liou, W. K., Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Beyond the flipped classroom: A highly interactive cloud-classroom (HIC) embedded into basic materials science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460–473
Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2017). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179–200
Looi, C. K., Sun, D., & Xie, W. (2015). Exploring students’ progression in an inquiry science curriculum enabled by mobile learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 43–54
Loveys, B. R., & Riggs, K. M. (2019). Flipping the laboratory: Improving student engagement and learning outcomes in second year science courses. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 64–79
Luo, H., Yang, T., Xue, J., & Zuo, M. (2019). Impact of student agency on learning performance and learning experience in a flipped classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 819–831
Morgado, J., Otero, J., Vaz-Rebelo, P., Sanjosé, V., & Caldeira, H. (2014). Detection of explanation obstacles in scientific texts: the effect of an understanding task vs. an experiment task. Educational Studies, 40(2), 164–173
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies
Novak, J., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Novak, J. D. (1990a). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949
Novak, J. D. (1990b). Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52
Palmer, D. (1995). The POE in the primary school: An evaluation. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 323–332
Pei, X., Jin, Y., Zheng, T., & Zhao, J. (2020). Longitudinal effect of a technology-enhanced learning environment on sixth-grade students’ science learning: the role of reflection. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 271–289
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S. P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583–608
Sesen, B. A. (2013). Diagnosing pre-service science teachers’ understanding of chemistry concepts by using computer-mediated predict-observe-explain tasks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 239–246
Song, D., Karimi, A., & Kim, P. (2016). A remotely operated science experiment framework for under-resourced schools. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 1706–1724
Srisawasdi, N., Feungchan, W., Meuansechai, K., Kongpet, K., & Panjaburee, P. (2016). The study on integrating visualised simulation into context-aware ubiquitous learning activities for elementary science education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(4), 263–291
Tan, S. C. (2019). Learning with computers: Generating insights into the development of cognitive tools using cultural historical activity theory. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 25–38
Tseng, S. S. (2020). Using concept mapping activities to enhance students’ critical thinking skills at a high school in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 249–256
Tzeng, J. Y. (2009). The impact of general and specific performance and self-efficacy on learning with computer-based concept mapping. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 989–996
Urbančič, M., & Glažar, S. A. (2012). Impact of experiments on 13-year-old pupils’ understanding of selected science concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(3), 207–218
van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281
van Leeuwen, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the usability of learning analytics reports in a flipped university course: when and how does information become actionable knowledge? Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1043–1064
van Riesen, S. A., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327–1344
Wang, L. C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference-matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39–52
Wang, Y. H. (2016). Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 391–415
Wang, Y., Huang, X., Schunn, C. D., Zou, Y., & Ai, W. (2019). Redesigning flipped classrooms: A learning model and its effects on student perceptions. Higher Education, 78, 711–728
Watson, M. K., Pelkey, J., Noyes, C. R., & Rodgers, M. O. (2016). Assessing conceptual knowledge using three concept map scoring methods. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 118–146
Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2015). Assessing changes in high school students’ conceptual understanding through concept maps before and after the computer-based predict-observe-explain (CB-POE) tasks on acid–base chemistry at the secondary level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 843–855
Ye, X. D., Chang, Y. H., & Lai, C. L. (2019). An interactive problem-posing guiding approach to bridging and facilitating pre-and in-class learning for flipped classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1075–1092
Acknowledgements
This study is supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under contract number MOST-109-2511-H-011-002-MY3. There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, GJ., Chen, CH. & Chen, WH. A concept mapping-based prediction-observation-explanation approach to promoting students’ flipped learning achievements and perceptions. Education Tech Research Dev 70, 1497–1516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10106-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10106-y