Abstract
Scaffolding is a mechanism for helping novice learners to solve a problem or complete a task that is beyond their current skill set. Prior research on immersive virtual reality (IVR) environments with scaffolding has mainly focused on the effectiveness of scaffolding for conceptual understanding and information processing. However, research on defining guidelines for designing computer-based scaffolds for IVR is scarce. To fill this gap, some recommendations are provided in this paper on how to design scaffolds for IVR environments for teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL). An eye-tracking study was conducted with N = 41 university students from three EFL courses that used two versions of an IVR application for learning and practicing prepositions of place in English with different scaffolding mechanisms and in different contexts: a context in which the participant can move through the virtual space and a context in which the participant remains seated. A comparative analysis was conducted to determine which scaffolds were more appropriate for learning in IVR. This study extends previous research on scaffolding in IVR environments by suggesting some empirical evidence, collected from eye-tracking, of the effectiveness of different types of scaffolds in IVR environments and some design guidelines are provided. The results showed that scaffolds that are naturally embedded in the IVR environment and are closer to the objects that students need to interact with, are more effective for increasing their learning performance. Practical implications of this study for instructional designers and developers include: scaffolds should be designed considering the spatial contiguity principle and should be naturally blended with the VR environment. Scaffolds should direct students attention to the most important information and scaffolds can be provided in different forms (text, images and on-site indicators).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abas, H., & Zaman, H. (2011). Scaffolding models for remedial students in using augmented reality storybook. In Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on electrical engineering and informatics, ICEEI 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2011.6021687
Ajabshir, Z., & Vahdany, F. (2017). The effect of peer scaffolding on developing L2 pragmatic knowledge: A sociocultural perspectiv. International Journal of English Language and Translation Studies, 5(4), 32–40.
Alemdag, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2018). A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 125, 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.023
Allcoat, D., & von Mühlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2140
Altan, T., & Cagiltay, K. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of spatial contiguity effect in educational animations. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9192, pp. 3–13). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_1
Aziz, Z., Fitriani, S., & Amalina, Z. (2020). Linguistic errors made by Islamic university EFL students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23224
Bacca-Acosta, J., Tejada, J., & Ospino-Ibañez, C. (2020). Learning to follow directions in English through a virtual reality environment: An eye tracking study and evaluation of usability. In G. Akcayir & C. Demmans (Eds.), Designing, deploying, and evaluating virtual and augmented reality in education (pp. 262–288). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5043-4
Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding in STEM education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0
Blake, M., Butcher-Green, J., & Doswell, J. (2006). An agent-supported multimodal scaffolding infrastructure. In Sixth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT’06), 150–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652392
Chang, S.-C., Hsu, T.-C., & Jong, S.-Y. (2020). Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers & Education, 146, 103758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103758
Chen, Y., Kao, T., & Sheu, J. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x
Deotale, P., & Hsieh, S.-J. (2012). Usability evaluation of a problem solving environment for automated system integration education using eye-tracking. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85029106523&partnerID=40&md5=fd908075e854f2c9aab459653a7d54bc
Doo, M., Bonk, C., & Heo, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of scaffolding effects in online learning in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21(3), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638
Dukes, L., Pence, T., Hodges, L., Meehan, N., & Johnson, A. (2013). SIDNIE: Scaffolded interviews developed by nurses in education. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on intelligent user interfaces - IUI ’13, 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449447
Glaser, M., & Schwan, S. (2015). Explaining pictures: How verbal cues influence processing of pictorial learning material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1006–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000044
Gulubba, S., Ahmad, A., & Mustafa, H. (2019). Scaffolding language development and learning in teacher-student interactions. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(29), 1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1160.0982S919
Haiying, L., Gobert, J., Dickler, R., & Moussavi, R. (2018). The impact of multiple real-time scaffolding experiences on science inquiry practices. In R. Nkambou, R. Azevedo, & J. Vassileva (Eds.), IntelligentTutoring Systems - ITS2018 (pp. 99–109). Springer.
Hao, Y., Lee, K., Chen, S.-T., & Sim, S. (2019). An evaluative study of a mobile application for middle school students struggling with English vocabulary learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.013
Holmqvist, K., & Andersson, R. (2017). Eye-Tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods, paradigms and measures. Lund Eye-Tracking Research Institute.
Huang, H.-W., Wu, C.-W., & Chen, N.-S. (2012). The effectiveness of using procedural scaffoldings in a paper-plus-smartphone collaborative learning context. Computers & Education, 59(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.015
Hui, W., Hu, P., Clark, T., Tam, K., & Milton, J. (2008). Technology-assisted learning: A longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00257.x
Johnson, C., & Mayer, R. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026923
Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2018). Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Frontiers in Robotics and A, I, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00081
Kaplan, R. (2019). The effect of stereoscopic three-dimensional images on vocabulary learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634172
Kim, N., Belland, B., & Walker, A. (2018). Effectiveness of computer-based scaffolding in the context of problem-based learning for stem education: Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1
Lajoie, S. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1279-2
Li, J. (2010). Learning vocabulary via computer-assisted scaffolding for text processing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.483678
Liang, J. S. (2010). Scaffolding for automotive air conditioning learning environment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 18(4), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20280
Marini, D., Folgieri, R., Gadia, D., & Rizzi, A. (2012). Virtual reality as a communication process. Virtual Reality, 16(3), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-011-0200-3
Martirosov, S., & Kopecek, P. (2017). Virtual reality and its influence on training and education: Literature review. In Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium (pp. 0708–0717). https://doi.org/10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.100
Mayer, R. (2001). Spatial contiguity principle. In Multimedia learning (pp. 81–95). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164603.006
Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
Metcalf, S., Reilly, J., Kamarainen, A., King, J., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2018). Supports for deeper learning of inquiry-based ecosystem science in virtual environments—Comparing virtual and physical concept mapping. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.018
Michel, M., & Smith, B. (2017). Eye-tracking research in computer-mediated language learning. In S. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, education and technology, encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 453–464). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_34-1
Mirahmadi, S., & Alavi, S. (2016). The role of traditional and virtual scaffolding in developing speaking ability of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n2p43
Mohamed, N., & Badioze, H. (2011). Scaffolding poetry lessons using desktop virtual reality. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 7067 LNCS (Issue PART 2, pp. 231–241). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25200-6_22
Nuthmann, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. Journal of Vision, 10(8), 20. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.8.20
Oh, E., & Song, D. (2021). Developmental research on an interactive application for language speaking practice using speech recognition technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 861–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09910-1
Ölmezer-Öztürk, E., & Öztürk, G. (2021). Reducing speaking anxiety in EFL classrooms: An explanatory mixed-methods study. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, 36, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.v0i36.18018
Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2
Polat, H. (2020). Investigating the use of text positions on videos: An eye movement study. Contemporary Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/7628
Powell, W., & Stevens, B. (2013). The influence of virtual reality systems on walking behaviour: A toolset to support application design. International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), 2013, 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2013.6662085
Quintana, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A Scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4
Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.750676
Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.010
Rassaei, E. (2014). Scaffolded feedback, recasts, and L2 development: A sociocultural perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12060.x
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
Salcedo, J., Lackey, S., & Badillo-Urquiola, K. (2015). Leveraging stress and intrinsic motivation to assess scaffolding during simulation-based training. In R. Shumaker & S. Lackey (Eds.), Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. VAMR 2015 (pp. 309–320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21067-4_32
Sampayo-Vargas, S., Cope, C. J., He, Z., & Byrne, G. J. (2013). The effectiveness of adaptive difficulty adjustments on students’ motivation and learning in an educational computer game. Computers & Education, 69, 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.004
Schroeder, N., & Cenkci, A. (2018). Spatial contiguity and spatial split-attention effects in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9435-9
Serafin, S., Erkut, C., Kojs, J., Nordahl, R., & Nilsson, N. C. (2016). Virtual reality musical instruments: Guidelines for multisensory interaction design. Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2016 -AM ’16, 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1145/2986416.2986431
Sharma, K., Giannakos, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2020). Eye-tracking and artificial intelligence to enhance motivation and learning. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00122-x
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66–70.
Shih, T., Chang, Y., Hsu, H., Wang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2004). A VR-based shared web system for distance education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 1(4), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/17415650480000025
Singh, G. (2017). Using virtual reality for scaffolding computer programming learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology - VRST ’17, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3141225
Smutny, P., Babiuch, M., & Foltynek, P. (2019). A review of the virtual reality applications in education and training. In 2019 20th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8765930
Su, J.-M. (2015). A self-regulated learning tutor to adaptively scaffold the personalized learning: A study on learning outcome for grade 8 Mathematics. In 2015 8th International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (UMEDIA), 3, 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1109/UMEDIA.2015.7297489
Suh, A., & Prophet, J. (2018). The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019
Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: Self-efficacy, learning achievement, and cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.5
Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. Joint AARE/NZARE Conference, 1–8. www.aare.edu.au/03pap/ver03682.pdf
Villarica, R., & Richards, D. (2014). Educational scaffolding for students stuck in a virtual world. In: Proceedings of the 25th Australasian conference on information systems. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/8139
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Wang, C., Lan, Y.-J., Tseng, W.-T., Lin, Y.-T., & Gupta, K. (2019). On the effects of 3D virtual worlds in language learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1598444
Wang, S., & Cheng, Y. (2011). Designing a situational 3D virtual learning environment to bridge business theory and practice. In R. Zhang, J. Cordeiro, X. Li, Z. Zhang, & J. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th international conference on enterprise information systems (pp. 313–315). SciTePress - Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003414103130315
Wedoff, R., Ball, L., Wang, A., Khoo, Y., Lieberman, L., & Rector, K. (2019). Virtual showdown. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300371
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Wu, C.-H., Chen, Y.-S., & Chen, T.-C. (2017). An adaptive e-learning system for enhancing learning performance: Based on dynamic scaffolding theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 903–913. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81061
Zarei, A., & Rezadoust, H. (2020). The effects of scaffolded and unscaffolded feedback on speaking anxiety and self-efficacy. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(4), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.13464.1655
Zhou, M., & Lam, K. (2019). Metacognitive scaffolding for online information search in K-12 and higher education settings: A systematic review. In Educational technology research and development (Vol. 67, Issue 6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09646-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study identified with ID 5INV7191 was approved by the Institutional Bioethics Committee of the Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz (No. 2018-10).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bacca-Acosta, J., Tejada, J., Fabregat, R. et al. Scaffolding in immersive virtual reality environments for learning English: an eye tracking study. Education Tech Research Dev 70, 339–362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10068-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10068-7