Technology has significantly impacted our work and leisure spaces, but education is still working to build a bridge between the technological knowledge and skills required for living now and preparing students for their future. Although a reduction in the cost of technology has led to increased access and connectivity within schools, where teachers now have a plethora of tools and resources available for them to use in teaching and learning, little has changed in classrooms. Teachers are attempting to provide effective instruction with and about digital technologies often with limited knowledge and skills themselves. This study investigated Australian primary teachers’ self-assessment of their digital technology proficiency. Through an online survey and interviews teachers were asked about their access to professional development and their knowledge and skills related to the digital technologies curriculum. This paper provides an analysis of their self-assessment. Barriers and enablers are identified along with practice implications to be considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Data will not be made available as the researchers are still publishing from the data set.
ACARA. (2015). Australian curriculum: Technologies. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
ACARA. (2019). Digital technologies: Sequence of content F-10. Retrieved from https://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/Digital_Technologies_-_Sequence_of_content.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
ACARA. (2019). Digital technologies teacher self-assessment matrix. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/media/5069/teachers-self-assessment-matrix-dt-19062019.docx. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
ACARA. (n.d.). Digital technologies (work samples). Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Search/?q=technologies&p=42605&t=ResourcePortfolio&s=42692. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Albion, P. R., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Information and communication technology and education: Meaningful change through teacher agency. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 381–396). Springer.
Australian Council for Computers in Education. (2015). Digital technologies in the Australian curriculum. Australian Educational Computing, 30(1), 1–15.
Australian Government, Department of Education and Training. (2014). Review of the Australian curriculum. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/review_of_the_national_curriculum_final_report.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Berry, M. (2013). Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for primary teachers. Retrieved from https://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/CASPrimaryComputing.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Blundell, C., Lee, K.-T., & Nykvist, S. (2016). Digital learning in schools: Conceptualising the challenges and influences on teacher practice. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 15, 535–560. https://doi.org/10.28945/3578
Curran, J. (2017). Introducing the digital technologies curriculum. Education Matters Magazine, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.educationmattersmag.com.au/digital-tech/. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & York, C. S. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers: Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2006.10784561
Etikan, I., Alkassim, R., & Abubakar, S. (2015). Comparison of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 3(1), 00055. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2015.03.00055
Harris, J., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://conference.iste.org/uploads/ISTE2017/HANDOUTS/KEY_108218083/2016ISTEStandardsforStudents.pdf
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2018). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://www.k12.wa.us/sites/default/files/public/edtech/standards/pubdocs/k-12-edtech-standards-complete-2018.pdf
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2020). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Kaarakainen, M. T., Kivinen, O., & Vainio, T. (2018). Performance-based testing for ICT skills assessing: A case study of students and teachers’ ICT skills in Finnish schools. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(2), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0553-9
Karp, P., (2019). Coalition to review Australian education curriculum in bid to reverse fall in student results. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/dec/12/coalition-to-review-australian-education-curriculum-in-bid-to-reverse-fall-in-student-results. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 16–31). IGI Global.
Lawrence, J., & Tar, U. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
McLean, F. M., Dixon, R. M., & Verenikina, I. (2014). Bringing it to the teachers: Building a professional network among teachers in isolated schools. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 24(2), 15–22.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings for the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2214–2226). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Niederhauser, D. S., Howard, S. K., Voogt, J., Agyei, D. D., Laferriere, T., Tondeur, J., & Cox, M. J. (2018). Sustainability and scalability in educational technology initiatives: Research-informed practice. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9382-z
Prestridge, S., & Main, K. (2018). Teachers as drivers of their professional learning through design teams, communities, and networks. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 433–447). Springer.
Redmond, P., Lock, J., & Danaher, P. (2015). Interrogating contemporary research in educational innovation. In P. Redmond, J. Lock, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Investigating innovation and issues in education (pp. 1–16). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
Sheffield, R., Blackley, S., & Moro, P. (2018). A professional learning model supporting teachers to integrate digital technologies. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 487–510.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Spiteri, M., & Rundgren, S.-N.C. (2018). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x
Sullivan, B. (2014). In Finland, coding is more important than long division. Computer Business Review. Retrieved from https://www.cbronline.com/news/in-finland-coding-is-more-important-than-long-division-4289008. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Vivian, R., & Falkner, K. (2018). A survey of Australian teachers’ self-efficacy and assessment approaches for the K-12 digital technologies curriculum. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3265757.3265762
Voogt, J., Laferriere, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247724
Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenny, S., Pieters, J., & de Vrier, B. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003
Wajcman, J. (2017). Automation: Is it really different this time? The British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12239
Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. Continuum.
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the University of Southern Queensland (Ethics Approval Number: H17REA145).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
Not applicable, No identifying information was collected or is provided in the paper.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Redmond, P., Smart, V., Powell, A. et al. Primary teachers’ self-assessment of their confidence in implementing digital technologies curriculum. Education Tech Research Dev (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10043-2
- Primary teachers
- Digital technologies
- Technology curriculum