Skip to main content

Two sides of the same coin: video annotations and in-video questions for active learning

Abstract

Video in education has become pervasive. Globally, educators are recording instructional videos to augment their students’ learning and, in many contexts, replace face-to-face lectures. However, the mere act of watching a video is primarily a passive learning experience likely leading to lack of student engagement hindering learning. Active learning strategies such as video annotations and in-video questions have the potential to shift the passive experience of watching an instructional video to a more active one by engaging students with learning strategies designed to promote self-regulated learning and improve content knowledge. This experimental study investigates the impact of in-video questions compared to video annotations on learning and self-efficacy in an experimental setting. Findings revealed that learners who annotated videos had higher self-efficacy than those who completed in-video questions likely due to the immediate feedback received from the in-video questions. The study further concluded that prior knowledge plays a critical role in selecting appropriate active learning strategies, suggesting that video annotations be considered when students have prior knowledge about a topic whereas in-video questions with immediate feedback be interspersed in videos when students do not have prior knowledge about a topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Bargeron, D., Gupta, A., Grudin, J., & Sanocki, E. (1999). Annotations for streaming video on the Web: System design and usage studies. Computer Networks, 31(11), 1139–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(99)00058-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Assessment-2020_propositions_final.pdf

  3. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiu, P.-S., Chen, H.-C., Huang, Y.-M., Liu, C.-J., Liu, M.-C., & Shen, M.-H. (2018). A video annotation learning approach to improve the effects of video learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1213653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colasante, M., & Douglas, K. (2016). Prepare-participate-connect: Active learning with video annotation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cummins, S., Beresford, A. R., & Rice, A. (2016). Investigating engagement with in-video quiz questions in a programming course. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2015.2444374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dall’Alba, G., & Bengtsen, S. (2019). Re-imagining active learning: Delving into darkness. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(14), 1477–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1561367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson, S., Macfadyen, L., Evan, F. R., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Using technology to encourage self-directed learning: The Collaborative Lecture Annotation System (CLAS). Ascilite Conference, 2012. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/Wellington12/2012/images/custom/dawson,_shane_-_using_technology.pdf

  10. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning strategies that foster generative learning. Eight Learning Strategies that Promote Understanding. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085

  11. Giannakos, M. N. (2013). Exploring the video-based learning research: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E191–E195. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Aalberg, T. (2016). Video-based learning ecosystem to support active learning: Application to an introductory computer science course. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0036-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239

  14. Haagsman, M. E., Scager, K., Boonstra, J., & Koster, M. C. (2020). Pop-up questions Within educational videos: Effects on students’ learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09847-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hodges, C. (2016). The development of learner self-efficacy in MOOCs. Global Learn 2016, 517–522. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172763/

  16. Hulsman, R. L., Harmsen, A. B., & Fabriek, M. (2009). Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: Assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hulsman, R. L., & van der Vloodt, J. (2015). Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students’ communication skills using a web-based video annotation system: Exploring content and specificity. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kleftodimos, A., & Evangelidis, G. (2018). Augmenting educational videos with interactive exercises and knowledge testing games. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2018, 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., & Hattie, J. (2018a). Understanding, assessing and enhancing student evaluative judgement in digital environments. In D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, & J. Tai (Eds.), Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education (pp. 70–78). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lodge, J. M., Kennedy, G., Lockyer, L., Arguel, A., & Pachman, M. (2018b). Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: An integrative review. Frontiers in Education, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mu, X. (2010). Towards effective video annotation: An approach to automatically link notes with video content. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1752–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2007). Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions: Misconception-based multimedia instruction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00248.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pardo, A., Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., Zhao, Y., Zhao, A., & Gašević, D. (2015). Identifying learning strategies associated with active use of video annotation software. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723611

  26. Pastötter, B., Schicker, S., Niedernhuber, J., & Bäuml, K.-H.T. (2011). Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.70.4.514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poquet, O., Lim, L., Mirriahi, N., & Dawson, S. (2018). Video and learning: A systematic review (2007–2017). In LAK ’18 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170376

  29. Rice, P., Beeson, P., & Blackmore-Wright, J. (2019). Evaluating the impact of a quiz question within an educational video. TechTrends, 63(5), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00374-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rolf, R., Reuter, H., Abel, M., & Hamborg, K.-C. (2014). Requirements of students for video-annotations in lecture recordings. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 11(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-07-2014-0021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shin, H., Ko, E.-Y., Williams, J. J., & Kim, J. (2018). Understanding the effect of in-video prompting on learners and instructors. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’18, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173893

  34. Simpson, M., & Bolduc-Simpson, S. (2018). Interactivity: Engaging video activities in online courses. Journal of Education and Social Development, 2(2), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1403941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Srivastava, N., Nawaz, S., Lodge, J. M., Velloso, E., Erfani, S., & Bailey, J. (2020). Exploring the usage of thermal imaging for understanding video lecture designs and students’ experiences. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Srivastava, N., Velloso, E., Lodge, J. M., Erfani, S., & Bailey, J. (2019). Continuous evaluation of video lectures from real-time difficulty self-report. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300816

  37. Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6313–6317. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221764110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas, A. O., Antonenko, P. D., & Davis, R. (2016). Understanding metacomprehension accuracy within video annotation systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. van Sebille, Y., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Mirriahi, N., Stansborough, R., & Dawson, S. (2018). Extending video interactions to support self-regulated learning in an online course.pdf. In M. Campbell, J. Willems, C. Adachi, D. Blake, I. Doherty, S. Krishnan, S. Macfarlane, L. Ngo, M. O’Donnell, S. Palmer, L. Riddell, I. Story, H. Suri & J. Tai (Eds.), Open oceans: Learning without borders. Proceedings ASCILITE 2018 Geelong, pp. 262–272. http://ascilite.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/ASCILITE-2018-Proceedings.pdf

  41. Vural, O. F. (2013). The impact of a question-embedded video-based learning tool on e-learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1315–1323. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017292.pdf.

  42. Weller, M. (2020). 25 years of Ed Tech. Athabasca University Press. https://www.aupress.ca/books/120290-25-years-of-ed-tech/

  43. Xiu, Y., Moore, M. E., Thompson, P., & French, D. P. (2019). Student perceptions of lecture-capture video to facilitate learning in a flipped classroom. TechTrends, 63(4), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0293-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Negin Mirriahi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors are not aware of any conflict of interest that would have influence or bias the work presented in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

The research was conducted after receiving ethical approval by the University of South Australia’s Human Research Ethics Committee with all participants providing informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirriahi, N., Jovanović, J., Lim, LA. et al. Two sides of the same coin: video annotations and in-video questions for active learning. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 2571–2588 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10041-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Videos
  • Prior knowledge
  • Video annotations
  • In-video questions
  • Self-efficacy
  • Video-based learning