In this preface to the special issue on embodied cognition and technology for learning, we begin with a brief overview of embodied cognition. We then provide a summary of the papers included in this special issue, noting the features of each paper that make a unique contribution to the special issue topic. Finally, we close by considering the questions and future directions for research on embodied cognition and technology that the special issue offers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abrahamson, D., Gutiérrez, J., Charoenying, T., Negrete, A., & Bumbacher, E. (2012). Fostering hooks and shifts: Tutorial tactics for guided mathematical discovery. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 17(1–2), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-012-9192-7
Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239.
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.
Almog, J. (2001). What am I? Descartes and the mind-body problem. Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.
Barsalou, L. W. (2016). Situated conceptualization: Theory and applications. In Y. Coello & M. H. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition. Psychology Press.
Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press.
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.
Favela, L. H., & Chemero, A. (2016). The animal-environment system. In Y. Coello & M. H. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition: Perceptual and emotional embodiment (pp. 59–74). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Flood, V. J., & Abrahamson, D. (2015, April). Refining mathematical meanings through multimodal revoicing interactions: The case of ‘‘faster’’. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago (pp. 16–20).
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum.
Gomila, T., & Calvo, P. (2008). Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Toward an integrated approach. Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00001-3
Hall, R., & Nemirovsky, R. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 207–215.
Hutto, D. D., Kirchhoff, M. D., & Abrahamson, D. (2015). The enactive roots of STEM: Rethinking educational design in mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9326-2
Jensen, L. J., Valentine, K. D., & Case, J. P. (2019). Accessing the Pokélayer: Augmented reality and fantastical play in Pokémon Go. In R. M. Branch, H. Lee, & S. S. Tseng (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 42, pp. 87–103). New York, NY: Springer.
Kopcha, T., & Ocak, C. (2019). Embodiment of Computational Thinking During Collaborative Robotics Activity. In Lund, K., Niccolai, G. P., Lavoué, E., Hmelo-Silver, C., Gweon, G., & Baker, M. (Eds.), A Wide Lens: Combining Embodied, Enactive, Extended, and Embedded Learning in Collaborative Settings, 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019, Volume 1 (pp. 464-471). Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from (Vol. 6). New York: Basic Books.
Lan, Y. J., Chen, N. S., Li, P., & Grant, S. (2015). Embodied cognition and language learning in virtual environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9401-x
Leitan, N. D., & Chaffey, L. (2014). Embodied cognition and its applications: A brief review. Sensoria A Journal of Mind, Brain & Culture, 10(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.7790/sa.v10i1.384
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge Classics. (Original work published 1945).
Nathan, M. J. (2017). Grounded mathematical reasoning. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Nemirovsky, R., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., & Wawro, M. (2012). When the classroom floor becomes the complex plane: Addition and multiplication as ways of bodily navigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 287–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611445
Riener, C., & Stefanucci, J. (2014). Perception and/for/with/as action. In The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp.117–125). Routledge.
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological psychology, 26(4), 325–352.
Shapiro, L. (2019). Embodied cognition. Routledge.
Sung, W., Ahn, J., & Black, J. B. (2017). Introducing computational thinking to young learners: Practicing computational perspectives through embodiment in mathematics education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9328-x
Thelen, E. (2012). Grounded in the world: Developmental origins of the embodied mind. Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness (pp. 115–146). Psychology Press.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press.
Vagle, M. D. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research. Routledge.
Valentine, K. D., & Kopcha, T. J. (2020). Manifestations of middle school learners’ problematization activity as an embodied phenomenon. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(5), 541–573.
Weisberg, S. M., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Embodied cognition and STEM learning: Overview of a topical collection in CR: PI. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–6.
Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children’s concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 506.
Williams, R. F. (2012). Image schemas in clock-reading: Latent errors and emerging expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 216–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.553259
Xu, X., & Ke, F. (2014). From psychomotor to ‘motorpsycho’: Learning through gestures with body sensory technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 711–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9351-8
Young, M. (2004). An ecological psychology of instructional design: Learning and thinking by perceiving–acting systems. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 169–177). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
This study was not conducted with any funding sources.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kopcha, T.J., Valentine, K.D. & Ocak, C. Editorial: preface to the special issue on embodied cognition and technology for learning. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 1881–1887 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10023-6
- Technology integration
- Embodied cognition
- Instructional design and development