Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Arnesen, T., Arnesen, T.-E., & Elstad, E. (2020). Exploring students’ explanations for off-task practices in an innovative learning environment (ILE) using a typology of agency as theoretical framework. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1777461.
Ashwin, P. (2012). Analysing teaching-learning interactions in higher education: Accounting for structure and agency. London: Continuum.
Barab, S. (2014). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 151–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bearman, M., Lambert, S., & O’Donnell, M. (2020). How a centralised approach to learning design influences students: A mixed methods study. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1792849.
Beckman, K., Apps, T., Bennett, S., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G., & Lockyer, L. (2019). Self-regulation in open-ended online assignment tasks: The importance of initial task interpretation and goal setting. Studies in Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1654450.
Bernstein, B. B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Broekkamp, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 203–220.
Calderhead, J. (1984). Teachers’ classroom decision making. London: Holt.
Carvalho, L. (2010). A sociology of informal learning in/about design. PhD Thesis, The University of Sydney.
Carvalho, L., & Garduño Freeman, C. (2018). CmyView: Learning by walking and sharing social values. In N. Bonderup Dohn, S. Cranmer, J. Sime, M. de Laat, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Networked learning: Reflections and challenges (pp. 167–186). Springer.
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (Eds.). (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2018). Design, learning and service innovation. Design Studies, 55, 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.003.
Carvalho, L., Goodyear, P., & de Laat, M. (Eds.). (2017). Place-based spaces for networked learning. New York: Routledge.
Chatteur, F. (2011). Design for pedagogy patterns for e-learning. PhD Thesis, The University of Sydney.
Dave, K. (2017). University teachers designing for active learning: Intentions, interpretations and the semantic turn in design. PhD Thesis, The University of Sydney.
Dohn, N. B. (2020). Units of analysis in learning research: Transparency, fit for purpose and purposeful fit. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100426.
Elen, J. (2020). “Instructional disobedience”: A largely neglected phenomenon deserving more systematic research attention. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2021–2032.
Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education: The ecology of sustainable innovation. New York: Routledge.
Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: Integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3056.
Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2019). The education ecology of universities: Integrating learning, strategy and the academy. New York: Routledge.
Engle, R. A., Lam, D. P., Meyer, X. S., & Nix, S. E. (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.695678.
Goodyear, P. (1999). Pedagogical frameworks and action research in open and distance learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1–7.
Goodyear, P. (2000). Environments for lifelong learning: Ergonomics, architecture and educational design. In J. M. Spector & T. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction & technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goodyear, P. (2011). Emerging methodological challenges for educational research. In L. Markauskaite, P. Freebody, & J. Irwin (Eds.), Methodological choice and design: Scholarship, policy and practice in social and educational research (pp. 253–266). Dordrecht: Springer.
Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2, 27–50 Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/system/files/HERDSARHE2015v02p27.pdf.
Goodyear, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). In medias res: Reframing design for learning. Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.19909.
Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2008). University students’ approaches to learning: Rethinking the place of technology. Distance Education, 29(2), 141–152.
Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (Eds.). (2010). Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Dohn, N. (2016). Artefacts and activities in the analysis of learning networks. In T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries and policy in networked learning (pp. 93–110). New York: Springer.
Goodyear, P., Ellis, R., & Marmot, A. (2018). Learning spaces research: Framing actionable knowledge. In R. Ellis & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Spaces of teaching and learning: Integrating perspectives on research and practice (pp. 221–238). Singapore: Springer Nature.
Gunn, W., Otto, T., & Smith, R. C. (Eds.). (2013). Design anthropology: Theory and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
Hativa, N., & Goodyear, P. (Eds.). (2002). Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and- online-learning.
Hoogveld, A., Paas, F., Jochems, W., & van Merrienboer, J. (2002). Exploring teachers’ instructional design practices from a systems design perspective. Instructional Science, 30, 291–305.
Ison, R., & Blackmore, C. (2014). Designing and developing a reflexive learning system for managing systemic change. Systems, 2(2), 119–136.
Kali, Y., Goodyear, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2011). Researching design practices and design cognition: Contexts, concretisation and pedagogical knowledge-in-pieces. Learning, Media & Technology, 36(2), 129–149.
Kali, Y., McKenney, S., & Sagy, O. (2015). Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. Instructional Science, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9343-4.
Koh, J. H. L., & Kan, R. Y. P. (2020). Students’ use of learning management systems and desired e-learning experiences: Are they ready for next generation digital learning environments? Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1799949.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Law, N., Li, L., Herrera, L. F., Chan, A., & Pong, T. (2017). A pattern language based learning design studio for an analytics informed inter-professional design community. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal, 33, 92–112.
Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
McDonnell, J. (2009). Collaborative negotiation in design: A study of design conversations between architect and building users. CoDesign, 5, 35–50.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2014). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Parchoma, G., Koole, M., Morrison, D., Nelson, D., & Dreaver-Charles, K. (2019). Designing for learning in the yellow house: A comparison of instructional and learning design origins and practices. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1704693.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life: Practices and places. London: Sage.
Reeves, T. C., & Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09811-3.
Reimann, P. (2011). Design-based research. In L. Markauskaite, P. Freebody, & J. Irwin (Eds.), Methodological choice and design: Scholarship, policy and practice in social and educational research (pp. 37–50). Dordrecht: Springer.
Reiser, R., & Dempsey, J. (Eds.). (2017). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Rogoff, B. (2014). Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: An orientation. Human Development, 57(2–3), 69–81.
Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36.
Simonsen, J., Svabo, C., Strandvad, S., Samson, K., Hertzum, M., & Hansen, O. (2014). Situated design methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spence, N. (2020). Designing for epistemic agency: How university student groups create knowledge and what helps them do it. PhD Thesis, The University of Sydney.
Sun, S. Y. H. (2018). Student configuration and place-making in fully online language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 932–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1466808.
Sun, S. Y. H., & Goodyear, P. (2019). Social co-configuration in online language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5102.
Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria: ASCD.
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., & Pawson, R. (2012). Realist methods in medical education research: What are they and what can they contribute? Medical Education, 46(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04045.x.
Yeoman, P. (2015). Habits & habitats: An ethnography of learning entanglement. PhD Thesis, The University of Sydney.
Yeoman, P., & Carvalho, L. (2019). Moving between material and conceptual structure: Developing a card-based method to support design for learning. Design Studies, 64, 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.05.003.
Yeoman, P., & Wilson, S. (2019). Designing for situated learning: Understanding the relations between material properties, designed form and emergent learning activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2090–2108.
Yeoman, P., & Carvalho, L., Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation and user-experience validation of the ACAD Toolkit. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Networked Learning. http://www.networkedlearning.aau.dk/digitalAssets/825/825844_09.-yeoman-et-al.---cross-cultural-adaptation-and-user-experience-validation-of-the-acad-toolkit.pdf.
Zheng, L. (2015). A systematic literature review of design-based research from 2004 to 2013. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 399–420.