Applying the Own it, Learn it, Share it framework to the flexible Pink Time assignment to scaffold student autonomy online and in person

Abstract

This response to Lee and Hannafin’s A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it (OLSit) (Lee and Hannafin, Educational Technology Research and Development 64:707–734, 2016) discusses its helpful design guidelines from a practitioner’s perspective. OLSit provides a blueprint for chance-taking with student-centered learning. Here, I apply this blueprint to a flexible assignment colleagues and I designed to promote intrinsic motivation and engagement, called Pink Time (PT), which asks students to “skip class, do whatever you want, and grade yourself.” Together, OLSit and PT are well suited for this moment of disruption and pivot to remote learning. Students’ stereotypes about what is “valid” in the classroom may be important limitations. But iterative and effective communication can shape students’ perceptions and scaffold their efforts. In the future, scholars and practitioners should consider how grades undermine online SCL strategies like OLSit and PT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baird, T. D., Kniola, D. J., Carlson, K. A., Russell, D. G., Hartter, J., Rogers, S., et al. (2020). Adapting pink time to promote self-regulated learning across course and student types. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baird, T. D., Kniola, D. J., Lewis, A. L., & Fowler, S. B. (2015). Pink time: Evidence of self-regulated learning and academic motivation among undergraduate students. Journal of Geography, 114(4), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.977334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mamun, M. A. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy D. Baird.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Human and animal rights

This response to a previously published paper contains no research involving human participants and/or animals.

Informed consent

Concerns surrounding informed consent are not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baird, T.D. Applying the Own it, Learn it, Share it framework to the flexible Pink Time assignment to scaffold student autonomy online and in person. Education Tech Research Dev (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09837-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Student-centered learning
  • Constructivism
  • Constructionism
  • Self-determination theory
  • Design framework
  • Application