Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we lay the foundations of the personal learning environment or PLE, its conception, cognitive and theoretical underpinnings, and implications for the design of pedagogical processes and learning ecosystems. We characterize the PLE as a technosocial reality that embodies the sociomaterial entanglement with which people learn as well as an approach that enacts contemporary ideas about how people learn. We argue that the learning ecology of the PLE and its disruptive educational character, position it as a framework that addresses the challenges of being in a continuous learning mode and empowers learners to direct their own learning and develop agency in lifelong learning. We envision the PLE as the core of a learning activity ecosystem that is diverse, personalized, social, adaptive, integrated, and transparent, enabling the creation of a network of learning that supports students as peers, creators and entrepreneurs, and agents of their own learning. We conclude with implications and challenges for future research and educational practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adell, J. (2018). Más allá del instrumentalismo en tecnología educativa. In J. Gimeno (Ed.), Cambiar los contenidos, cambiar la educación. Madrid: Morata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adell, J., & Castañeda, L. (2010). Los Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje (PLEs): Una nueva manera de entender el aprendizaje. In R. Roig-Vila & M. Fiorucci (Eds.), Claves para la investigación en innovación y calidad educativa. La integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la comunicación y la Interculturalidad en las aulas. Rome: Marfil & Roma Tre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwell, G. (2007). The personal learning environments: The future of eLearning? ELearning Papers, 2(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwell, G. (2019). E-learning at the workplace. In S. McGrath, M. Mulder, J. Papier, & R. Suart (Eds.), Handbook of vocational education and training: developments in the changing world of work (pp. 1–25). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49789-1_110-1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Attwell, G., Castañeda, L., & Buchem, I. (2013). Guest editorial preface: Special issue from the personal learning environments 2011 conference. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 4(4), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke, L. M. (2013). E-learning and self-determined learning skills. In S. Hase & C. Kenyon (Eds.), Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action (pp. 55–68). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brick, B. (2011). Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 2(3), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchem, I., Attwell, G. & Torres, R. (2011). Understanding personal learning environments: Literature review and synthesis through the activity theory lens. In Proceedings of the The PLE Conference 2011, 10th–12th July 2011, Southampton, UK.

  • Buckingham-Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, M., & Guilana, S. (2011). From personal to social: Learning environments that work. Digital Education Review, 20, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2019). Connecting the dots: Theorizing and mapping learning entanglement through archaeology and design. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2013). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: Claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Alicante: Marfil. Retrieved from https://www.um.es/ple/libro.

  • Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, L., & Soto, F. J. (2010). Building personal learning environments by using and mixing ICT tools in a professional way. Digital Educational Review, 18, 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, L., Dabbagh, N., & Torres-Kompen, R. (2017). Personal learning environments: Research-based practices, frameworks and challenges. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, L., Tur, G., & Torres-Kompen, R. (2019). Impacto del concepto PLE en la literatura sobre educación: La última década. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigognini, M. E., Pettenati, M. C., & Edirisingha, P. (2011). Personal knowledge management skills in Web 2.0-based learning. In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-Learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 109–127). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, C., & Engel, A. (2014). Introduction: Personal learning environments in the context of formal education. Cultura y Educación, 26(4), 617–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011a). Back to the future: Tracing the roots and learning affordances of social software. In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-Learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011b). Impact of web 2.0 on higher education. In D. W. Surry, T. Stefurak, & R. Gray (Eds.), Technology integration in higher education: Social and organizational aspects (pp. 174–187). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The role of social media in self-regulated learning. International Journal of Web Based Communities (IJWBC), 9(2), 256–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M., & Dohn, N. B. (2019). Is networked learning postdigital education? Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00034-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M. J. (2016). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Dordtecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2008). Semantic wave 2008 report: Industry roadmap to web 3.0 & multibillion dollar market opportunities (executive summary). Washington DC: Project 10X. Retrieved June 16, 2008, from https://project10x.com/blog_downloads/SWsummary.pdf.

  • Decuypere, M., & Simons, M. (2016). Relational thinking in education: Topology, sociomaterial studies, and figures. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1166150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J., & Benko, C. (2016). AT&T’s talent overhaul. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/10/atts-talent-overhaul.

  • Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecclestone, K. (2016). An identity crisis? Using concepts of ‘identity’, ‘agency’ and ‘structure’ in the education of adults. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, D. (2019). Creating an ecosystem around small data. Small Data Lab @ Cornell Tech. Retrieved from https://smalldata.io/.

  • Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2002). European report on quality indicators of lifelong learning: Fifteen quality indicators. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels (Belgium). Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED481329.pdf.

  • Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial (1st ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, S. H., & Väljataga, T. (2011). Personal learning environments: Concept or technology? International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 2(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauenberger, C. (2020). Entanglement HCI the next wave? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L. & Dohn, N. (2014). Design for networked learning: framing relations between participants’ activities and the physical setting.

  • Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2016). It’s not all about the learner: Reframing students’ digital literacy as sociomaterial practice. In t ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, & M. de Laat (Eds.), Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning (pp. 77–92). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31130-2_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gourmaj, M., Naddami, A., Fahli, A., & Nehari, D. (2017). Teaching power electronics and digital electronics using personal learning environments. From traditional learning to remote experiential learning. International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE), 13(8), 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A.-M., Vasalampi, K., Valleala, U. M., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Assessing agency of university students: Validation of the AUS Scale. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2061–2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowland, V. C. P., & Thomas, M. S. C. (2014). Educating the adult brain: How the neuroscience of learning can inform educational policy. International Review of Education, 60(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9412-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, A.-M., Ruhalahti, S., & Veermans, M. (2019). The online learning process and scaffolding in student teachers’ personal learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9793-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, S. (2013). Characterisation of a personal learning environment as a lifelong learning tool. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maina, M. F., & Garcia-González, I. (2015). Articulating personal pedagogies through learning ecologies. In B. Gros & M. Maina (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning (pp. 73–94). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malafouris, L., & Renfrew, C. (2010). The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal learning environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 177–193). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marín, V., Negre-Bennasar, F., & Pérez-Garcias, A. (2014). Construction of the foundations of the PLE and PLN for collaborative learning. Comunicar, 21(42), 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. R. (2016). The ideology of learner agency and the neoliberal self. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. L., & Goldstein, I. P. (1977). Structured planning and debugging. In Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, USA, 2, pp 773–779.

  • Molnar, A., Miron, G., Elgeberi, N., Barbour, M. K., Huerta, L., Shafer, S. R. et al. (2019). Virtual schools in the U.S. 2019. Boulder, CO: National education policy center. Retrieved from https://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2019

  • Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (2016). What is technology? In N. Rushby & D. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of learning technology (pp. 35–57). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118736494.ch3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passey, D., Shonfeld, M., Appleby, L., Judge, M., Saito, T., & Smits, A. (2018). Digital agency: Empowering equity in and through education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelster, B., Johnson, D., Stempel, J., & van der Vyver, B. (2017). Careers and learning: Real time, all the time. In B. Walsh & E. Volini (Eds.), Rewriting the rules for the digital age (pp. 29–38). New York: Deloitte University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, E., van den Berg, J., & Veen, W. (2015). Facilitating student-driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments. Computers & Education, 81, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25, 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şahin, S., & Uluyol, Ç. (2016). Preservice teachers’ perception and use of personal learning environments (PLEs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. (2007). Social software: Facilitating information-, identity- and relationship management. In T. N. Burg & J. Schmidt (Eds.), BlogTalks reloaded: Social softwar research & cases (pp. 31–49). Norderstedt: Books on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Critical questions. In G. Ferreira, L. Da Silva Rosando, & J. SáCarvalho (Eds.), Education and technology: Critical approaches (pp. 105–122). Rio de Janeiro: SESES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessums, C. (2006). Notes on the significance of the emergence of blogs and wikis. Retrieved from https://eduspaces.net/csessums/weblog/6172.html.

  • Siemens, G. (2005). A learning theory for the digital age [Entrada de Blog]. Retrieved from https://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.

  • Selwyn, N., & Pangrazio, L. (2018). Doing data differently? Developing personal data tactics and strategies amongst young mobile media users. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517118765021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrà, A., González-Sanmamed, M., & Guitert, M. (2013). Learning ecologies: Informal professional development opportunities for teachers. In the 63th Annual Conference International Council for Education Media (ICEM) (pp. 1–2), Singapore.

  • Taraghi, B. (2012). Ubiquitous personal learning environment (UPLE). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 7(2), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Kompen, R., Edirisingha, P., Canaleta, X., Alsina, M., & Monguet, J. M. (2019). Personal learning environments based on Web 2.0 services in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 194–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, E., & Sabetzadeh, F. (2014). Lessons learnt from and sustainability of adopting a personal learning environment & network (PLE&N). In Paper presented at the international conferences on educational technologies and sustainability, technology and education (pp. 51–58), Taiwan.

  • Tu, C. H., Sujo-Montes, L., Yen, C. J., Chan, J. Y., & Blocher, M. (2012). The integration of personal learning environments and open network learning environments. TechTrends, 56(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0571-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tur, G., Marín, V. I., & Carpenter, J. (2017). Using Twitter in higher education in Spain and the USA. Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, 25(51), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turker, M. A., & Zingel, S. (2008). Formative interfaces for scaffolding self-regulated learning in PLEs. Retrieved from https://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media15975.pdf.

  • Van Harmelen, M. (2008). Design trajectories: Four experiments in PLE implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Moe, R. (2017). The rise of educational technology as a sociocultural and ideological phenomenon. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/4/the-rise-of-educational-technology-as-a-sociocultural-and-ideological-phenomenon.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B., Potter, J., & Eynon, R. (2019). New research problems and agendas in learning, media and technology: The editors’ wishlist. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1614953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen, C.-J., Tu, C.-H., Sujo-Montes, L., & Sealander, K. (2016). A predictor for PLE management: Impacts of self-regulated online learning on students’ learning skills. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 9(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0901.03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nada Dabbagh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dabbagh, N., Castaneda, L. The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 3041–3055 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09831-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09831-z

Keywords

Navigation