Having stepped down as editor of Educational Technology Research & Development after 15 years of service, and having learned much from Steve Ross, who served as editor for 18 years, and from many of the leading scholars in the broad and multidisciplinary field of educational technology, I have been thinking of the value added by the research and developments of so many talented and dedicated academics. The innovative learning environments and careful studies I have read these last 15 years leads me to wonder why there seems to be so little progress in the field of educational technology. In other fields such as automotive engineering or medical research there have been remarkable gains. In fields that inform education such as brain science and social behavior, we have also seen significant and sustained progress. Why has there not been more progress in and impact of educational technology research and the many innovative learning environments that have been created in recent years? That is the question that motivates these remarks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Craft, J. L., & Hustwit, R. E. (1984). Without proof or evidence: Essays of O, K Bouwsma. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath & Co. Rerieved from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37423/37423-h/37423-h.htm
Dijkstra, E. W. (1972). The humble programmer. Communications of the ACM,15, 859–866.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagné, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development,38(1), 23–30.
Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development,48(4), 63085.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development,50(3), 43–59.
Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient and engaging instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Spector, J. M. (2000, Fall). Trends and issues in educational technology: How far we have not come. Update Semiannual Bulletin 21(2). Syracuse, NY: The ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Technology.
Spector, J. M. (2018, July). Thinking and learning in the Anthropocene: The new three Rs. Presented at the 2018 international big history conference, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, 26–29 July 2019. Retrieved from https://www.learndev.org/dl/HLA-IBHA2018/Spector%2C%20J.%20M.%20(2018).%20Thinking%20and%20Learning%20in%20the%20Anthropocene.pdf
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench & Treubner Co. Retrieved from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5740/5740-pdf.pdf
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Spector, J.M. Remarks on progress in educational technology. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 833–836 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09736-x
- Educational research
- Instructional technology
- Student support