The purpose of this paper is to introduce the next evolution of our quest for technology integration, one that moves away from the product of teacher decision making (i.e., the type of use) towards their process of decision making. After presenting a brief history of our field’s quest, we bring together three ideas about teacher decision making with technology that have emerged through the research: technology integration is (1) value driven, (2) embedded in a dynamic system, and (3) a product of a teacher’s perception of what is possible. We then combine these ideas into a model of teacher decision making with technology that reflects how a teacher decides to integrate technology within a dynamic system. Implications for teacher beliefs research, professional development, and technology integration practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adolph, K. E., & Kretch, K. S. (2015). Gibson’s theory of perceptual learning. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences,10, 127–134.
Baker, E. L., Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. L. (1990). Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow (ACOT) evaluation study first- and second-year findings (Report No. 7). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc.
Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,364(1521), 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319.
Barsalou, L. W. (2015). Situated conceptualization: Theory and applications. In Y. Coello & M. H. Fischer (Eds.), Perceptual and emotional embodiment: Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 19–45). New York, NY: Routledge.
Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education,39(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1.
Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Educational Policy Analysis Archives,8(51), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n51.2000.
Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 National Survey Report #3. Irvine, CA, and Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine, and University of Minnesota.
Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education,77, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Brush, T. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology (PT3). Educational Technology Research and Development,51(1), 39–40.
Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teacher beliefs and practices. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 66–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
Callahan, C., Saye, J., & Brush, T. (2015). Supporting in-service teachers' professional teaching knowledge with educatively scaffolded digital curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,15(4), 568–599.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education,57(1), 1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007.
Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research,102(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.1.65-75.
Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V. L., & Green, D. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools,13(1), 1–11.
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal,38(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004813.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Reshaping teaching policy, preparation, and practice: Influences of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
de Koster, S., Volman, M., & Kuiper, E. (2017). Concept-guided development of technology in ‘traditional’ and ‘innovative’ schools: Quantitative and qualitative differences in technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development,65(5), 1325–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9527-0.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher,38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1990). Teacher beliefs and practices part I: Patterns of change the evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms first–fourth fear findings (Report No. 8). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc.
Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership,48(8), 45–52.
Er, E., & Kim, C. (2017). Episode-centered guidelines for teacher belief change toward technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development,65(4), 1041–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9518-1.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development,47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs? The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development,53(4), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen's vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education,64, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,42(3), 255–284.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education,59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.
Evolution, n. Def. 7a. (2008). In Oxford English dictionary (3rd ed.). Retrieved from www-oed-com
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (Vol. 2, pp. 471–499). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gill, M. G., & Fives, H. (2015). Introduction. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends,60(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y.
Harris, J. (2005). Our agenda for technology integration: It’s time to choose. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,5(2), 116–122.
Heitink, M., Voogt, J., Verplanken, L., van Braak, J., & Fisser, P. (2016). Teachers’ professional reasoning about their pedagogical use of technology. Computers & Education,101, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.009.
Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies,37(2), 155–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276961.
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education,51(4), 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001.
Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development,55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
Hixon, E., & Buckenmeyer, J. (2009). Revisiting technology integration in schools: Implications for professional development. Computers in the Schools,26(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560902906070.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist,42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368.
Howard, S. K., Chan, A., Mozejko, A., & Caputi, P. (2015). Technology practices: Confirmatory factor analysis and exploration of teachers' technology integration in subject areas. Computers & Education,90, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.008.
Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT—Replacement, amplification, and transformation- framework. In Proceedings of the society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1616–1620). Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010a). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development,58(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010b). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education,55(3), 937–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004.
Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends,43(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818172.
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,14(3), 581–597.
Khan, M. S. H., & Markauskaite, L. (2018). Technical and vocational teachers’ conceptions of ICT in the workplace: Bridging the gap between teaching and professional practice. Journal of Educational Computing Research,56(7), 1099–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117740396.
Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education,29, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005.
Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016). Toward a broader understanding of teacher technology integration beliefs and values. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,24(3), 309–335.
Koh, J. H. L. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development,67(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5.
Kolb, L. (2017). Learning first, technology second: The educator's guide to designing authentic lessons. Portland, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175–190.
Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lei, J. (2010). Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship between technology use and student outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology,41(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00961.x.
Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education,49(2), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.013.
Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education,56(4), 1012–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.001.
Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development,65(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9.
Liu, M., Ko, Y., Willmann, A., & Fickert, C. (2018). Examining the role of professional development in a large school district’s iPad initiative. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,50(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1387743.
Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Strahl, D., & Ross, S. M. (2008). Does technology integration "work" when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International,45(3), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802284317.
Maeng, J. L., Mulvey, B. K., Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2013). Preservice teachers’ TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology,22(6), 838–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9434-z.
Martin, W., Strother, S., Beglau, M., Bates, L., Reitzes, T., & Culp, K. M. (2010). Connecting instructional technology professional development to teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,43(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782561.
McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education,123, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008.
McKenney, S., & Roblin, N. P. (2018). Connecting research and practice: Teacher inquiry and design-based research. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1–14). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_30-2
McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record,108(6), 1017–1054.
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology,23(3), 40–42.
Mouza, C. (2009). Does research-based professional development make a difference? A longitudinal investigation of teacher learning in technology integration. Teachers College Record,111(5), 1195–1241.
Mouza, C., & Barrett-Greenly, T. (2015). Bridging the app gap: An examination of a professional development initiative on mobile learning in urban schools. Computers & Education,88, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.009.
Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education,51(4), 1523–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003.
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education,55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002.
Palak, D., & Walls, R. T. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and technology practices: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,41(4), 417–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782537.
Pittman, T., & Gaines, T. (2015). Technology integration in third, fourth and fifth grade classrooms in a Florida school district. Educational Technology Research and Development,63(4), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9391-8.
Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers’ espoused and enacted practices. The Journal of Educational Research,104(2), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636737.
Project Tomorrow. (2017). Trends in digital learning: Building teachers’ capacity and competency to create new learning experiences for students. Retrieved from https://tomorrow.org/speakup/speak-up-2016-trends-digital-learning-june-2017.html
Puentedura, R. (2014). Building transformation: An introduction to the SAMR model [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/08/22/BuildingTransformation_AnIntroductionToSAMR.pdf
Quest, n.2. Def. 4a. (2007). In Oxford English dictionary online (3rd ed.). Retrieved from www-oed-com
Richardson, M. J., & Chemero, A. (2014). Complex dynamical systems and embodiment. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (1st ed., pp. 39–50). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ringstaff, C., Yocam, K., & Marsh, J. (1996). Integrating technology into classroom instruction: An assessment of the impact of the ACOT teacher development center project (Report No. 22). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc.
Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,27(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00383.x.
Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Oxford: Ashgate.
Sellars, M. (2017). Reflective practice for teachers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shifflet, R., & Weilbacher, G. (2015). Teacher beliefs and their influence on technology use: A case study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,15(3), 368–394.
Skott, J. (2015). The promises, problems, and prospects of research on teachers’ beliefs. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 13–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). Exploring the link between teachers’ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior,24(6), 2541–2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.020.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development,65(3), 555–575.
Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education,118, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009.
Wang, F., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Why do teachers need to use technology in their classrooms? Issues, problems, and solutions. Computers in the Schools,20(4), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v20n04_05.
Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414.
Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Reeves, T. C., & Coster, D. C. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers' practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Education,79, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.006.
Watson, G. (2006). Technology professional development: Long-term effects on teacher self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,14(1), 151–165.
Weston, M. E., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment,9(6), 1–26.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal,40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record,104(3), 482–515.
Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Frank, K. A. (2006). The social life of technology: An ecological analysis of technology diffusion in schools. Pedagogies,1, 135–149.
This study was not conducted with any funding sources.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kopcha, T.J., Neumann, K.L., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. et al. Process over product: the next evolution of our quest for technology integration. Education Tech Research Dev 68, 729–749 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09735-y
- Technology integration
- Dynamic systems
- Teacher technology use
- Teacher beliefs
- Teacher decision making