Skip to main content

The development and validation of an attitude towards MALL instrument

Abstract

In light of increasing interest in mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) and recent calls for more replication studies in second language research, the present study aimed to develop and validate an attitudinal instrument to measure language learners’ attitudes towards MALL. In doing so, the present study partially and conceptually replicated Vandewaetere and Desmet’s (Comput Assist Lang Learn 22(4):349–380, 2009) computer-assisted language learning attitude scale. The attitude towards MALL (A-MALL) instrument, consisting of 20 items, was validated across a sample of 244 participants with diverse educational and demographic backgrounds. Principal components analysis and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine the psychometric features of the items, and to determine the underlying factor structure. The results revealed a five-factor solution, which was largely in line with the tripartite model of attitude (i.e., affective, cognitive and behavioral components). Further, the A-MALL instrument exhibited good reliability and validity. Finally, the limitations of the study and the future use of the A-MALL instrument in second language research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., Zanna, M. P., & Kumkale, G. T. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 3–19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryadoust, V., Mehran, P., & Alizadeh, M. (2016). Validating a computer assisted language learning attitude instrument used in Iranian EFL context: An evidence-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 29(3), 561–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryadoust, V., & Shahsavar, Z. (2016). Validity of the Persian blog attitude questionnaire: An evidence-based approach. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 15(1), 417–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 15(3), 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies—Students’ behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 612–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burston, J. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994–2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burston, J. (2014). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, D. M. (2012). Replication studies in CALL research. CALICO Journal, 29(4), 591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashtestani, R. (2016). Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students’ use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(S1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonulal, T. (2019). Missing data management practices in L2 research: The good, the bad and the ugly. Erzincan University Education Faculty Journal, 21(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonulal, T. (forthcoming). The use of Instagram as a mobile-assisted language learning tool. Contemporary Educational Technology.

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2011). Social psychology (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahromi, S. A., & Salimi, F. (2013). Exploring the human element of computer-assisted language learning: An Iranian context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 158–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., & Clarke, V. A. (1994). A computer attitude scale for secondary students. Computers in Education, 22(4), 315–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3701–3709). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). The particular need for replication in the quantitative study of SLA: A case study of the mnemonic effect of assonance in collocations. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantle-Bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: Links to proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantle-Bromley, C., & Miller, R. B. (1991). Effect of multicultural lessons on attitudes of students of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 418–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68(2), 321–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L. (2015). Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics. CALICO Journal, 32(2), 232–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Methodological synthesis in quantitative L2 research: A review of reviews and a case study of exploratory factor analysis. Language Learning, 65(S1), 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porte, G. (2013). Who needs replication? CALICO Journal, 30(1), 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porte, G., & Richards, K. (2012). Replication in quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 284–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, H. & Hubbard, P. (2013). CALL and learner autonomy: Affordances and constraints. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer assisted language learning (pp. 359–375). London: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, H., & Pegrum, M. (2015). Supporting language learning on the move: An evaluative framework for mobile language learning resources. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Second language acquisition research and materials development for language learning (pp. 116–141). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, H., & White, C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice (pp. 58–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaft, T. M., Sharfman, M. P., & Wu, W. W. (2004). Reliability assessment of the attitude towards computers instrument (ATCI). Computers in Human Behaviour, 20(5), 661–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., & Schulze, M. (2013). Thirty years of the CALICO Journal—Replicate, replicate, replicate. CALICO Journal, 30(1), i–iv.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. Retrieved from http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning.

  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2006). Attitudes towards computers: A study of post-secondary students in Singapore. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewaetere, M., & Desmet, P. (2009). Introducing psychometrical validation of questionnaires in CALL research: The case of measuring attitude towards CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 349–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users’ attitudes towards the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 69, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, G., & Kabata, K. (2010). Students’ and instructors’ attitudes towards the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talip Gonulal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Attitudes towards mobile assisted language learning (A-MALL) questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonulal, T. The development and validation of an attitude towards MALL instrument. Education Tech Research Dev 67, 733–748 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09663-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09663-6

Keywords

  • Attitude
  • Mobile-assisted language learning
  • Replication research
  • Scale development