Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the galaxy question: the influence of situation and first principles on designers’ judgments about useful instructional methods

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Merrill’s (Education Tech Research Dev 50(3):43–59, 2002, First principles of instruction. In: Reigeluth CM, Carr-Chellman A (eds) Instructional-design theories and models: building a common knowledge base, vol III. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 41–56, 2009) first principles have become ubiquitous in the instructional design literature and in the syllabi of instructional design graduate programs. Some consider first principles to be universal, that they are applicable to all instructional situations. To examine this closer, this research examines the galaxy question posed by Reigeluth and Carr-Chellman (Situational principles of instruction. In: Reigeluth CM, Carr-Chellman A (eds) Instructional-design theories and models: building a common knowledge base, vol III. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 57–68, 2009a), which hypothesizes that universal principles and/or methods of instruction are unlikely. To examine the galaxy question, and to replicate and generalize instructional theory findings from previous research, this research asked two groups of instructional designers (one group from an Introductory instructional design course, and another group in a Capstone course) to rate the usefulness of 26 instructional methods for No Conditions (values), Situation (first principles), and Scenarios (rich conditions). The results show no significant difference in values about methods between the two groups, suggesting that the source of designer values comes from individual learning experiences, and not dominant group socialization as predicted. Furthermore, the results replicate and generalize findings from prior research. Overall, the results suggest that first principles are not universal, and the researcher suggests that another first principle be added to Merrill’s first principles model to better represent the interests of the affective domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Betsch, T. (2014). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 3–22). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichelmeyer, B. K., Marken, J., Harris, T., Misanchuk, M., & Hixon, E. (2009). Fostering affective development outcomes. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 249–273). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cillers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and the theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honebein, P. C. (2016). The influence of values and rich conditions on designers’ judgments about useful instructional methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9485-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honebein, P. C., & Honebein, C. H. (2014). The influence of cognitive domain content levels and gender on designer judgments regarding useful instructional methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9322-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honebein, P. C., & Honebein, C. H. (2015). Effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal: pick any two? The influence of learning domains and learning outcomes on designer judgments of useful instructional methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9396-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 563–590). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1984). Preparing instructional objectives. Belmont, CA: Lake.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. L., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Affective education and the affective domain: Implications for instructional-design theories and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 485–509). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2009). First principles of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 41–56). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement, and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. J., II, & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 5–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. A., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2009a). Situational principles of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 57–68). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. A., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2009b). Understanding instructional theory. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 3–26). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C. A., & Keller, J. B. (2009). Understanding instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 27–35). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. (n.d.). PROC GLM for unbalanced ANOVA. Retrieved from https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63347/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_glm_sect005.htm

Download references

Acknowledgements

The researcher thanks Dr. Anthony Marker, Linda Urban, Brett Christensen, Dr. In Gu Kang, Dr. Soo Jeoung “Crystal” Han, and Dr. Spencer Hays for their assistance with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Customer Performance Group, 5450 Wintergreen Lane, Reno, NV, 89511, USA

    Peter C. Honebein

Authors
  1. Peter C. Honebein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. Honebein.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honebein, P.C. Exploring the galaxy question: the influence of situation and first principles on designers’ judgments about useful instructional methods. Education Tech Research Dev 67, 665–689 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09660-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09660-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation