Use of Felder and Silverman learning style model for online course design

Abstract

Learning Management Systems are used in millions of higher education courses, across various countries and disciplines. Teachers build courses reflecting their individual teaching methods, which may not always fit students’ different learning styles. However, limited information is known about how well these courses support the learners. The study aims to explore the use of Felder and Silverman learning style for online course design. The study has used linear transfer function system models to develop fundamentals of feedback by a course analyzer tool. This interactive tool allows teachers to determine a course’s support level for specific learning styles, based on the Felder and Silverman learning style model. The Felder and Silverman learning style model in this study is used to visualize the fit between course and learning style to help teachers improve their course’s support for diverse learning styles. The results of a pilot study successfully validated the course analyzer tool, as it has potential to improve the design of the course in future and allow more insight into overall student performance. The findings suggest that a course designed with certain learning styles in mind can improve learning of the students with those specific learning styles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Adkins, D., & Guerreiro, M. (2018). Learning styles: Considerations for technology enhanced item design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, S., Awan, A., & Roth, D. (2004). Learning to detect objects in images via a sparse, part-based representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(11), 1475–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad, N., Tasir, Z., Kasim, J., & Sahat, H. (2013). Automatic detection of learning styles in learning management systems by using literature-based method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-azawei, A., & Badii, A. (2013). A probabilistic approach for the generation of learning sessions tailored to the learning styles of learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 8(6), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v8i6.3084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battalio, J. (2009). Success in distance education: Do learning styles and multiple formats matter? The American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bower, M. (2006). Virtual classroom pedagogy. ACM Sigcse Bulletin, 38, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. British Council. (2016). Teaching English: Field independent learners. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/field-independent-learners.

  8. Buch, K., & Sena, C. (2001). Accommodating diverse learning styles in the design and delivery of on-line learning experiences. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1), 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000228834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang, Y. C., Kao, W. Y., Chu, C. P., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). A learning style classification mechanism for e-learning. Computers & Education, 53(2), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, D., Weber, J., & Zambrano, R. (2013). Teaching business ethics online: Perspectives on course design, delivery, student engagement, and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1932-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De la Varre, C., Irvin, M. J., Jordan, A. W., Hannum, H., & Farmer, T. W. (2014). Reasons for student dropout in an online course in a rural K–12 setting. Distance Education, 35(3), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorça, F. A., Araújo, R. D., De Carvalho, V. C., Resende, D. T., & Cattelan, R. G. (2016). An automatic and dynamic approach for personalized recommendation of learning objects considering students learning styles: An experimental analysis. Informatics in education, 15(1), 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorca, F. A., Lima, L. V., Fernandes, M. A., & Lopes, C. R. (2013). Comparing strategies for modeling students learning styles through reinforcement learning in adaptive and intelligent educational systems: An experimental analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 2092–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2008.4720326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Felder, R. M., Soloman, B. A. (2012). Index of learning styles questionnaire. North Carolina State University. Retrieved from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html.

  17. Franzoni-Velázquez, A. L., Cervantes-Pérez, F., & Assar, S. (2012). A quantitative analysis of student learning styles and teacher teachings strategies in a mexican higher education institution. Journal of applied research and technology, 10(3), 289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garland, D., & Martin, B. N. (2005). Do gender and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 134–176. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gogus, A., & Ertek, G. (2016). Learning and personal attributes of university students in predicting and classifying the learning styles: Kolb’s nine-region versus four-region learning styles. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Graf, S. (2007). Advanced adaptivity in learning management systems by considering learning styles. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5284970\nhttp://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1632300.

  22. Graf, S., & Liu, T. (2009). Supporting teachers in identifying students’ learning styles in learning management systems: An automatic student modelling approach. Educational Technology and Society, 12, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Graf, S., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk, (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00336.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., Hung, C. M., & Huang, I. (2013). A learning style perspective to investigate the necessity of developing adaptive learning systems. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kolb, D. D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, K. M. (2015). Learning styles and perceptions of student teachers of computer-supported collaborative learning strategy using wikis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lo, J. J., Chan, Y. C., & Yeh, S. W. (2012). Designing an adaptive web-based learning system based on students’ cognitive styles identified online. Computers & Education, 58(1), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mamat, N., & Yusof, N. (2013). Learning style in a personalized collaborative learning framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mayer, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mayes, R., Natividad, G., & Spector, J. M. (2015). Challenges for educational technologists in the 21st century. Education Sciences, 5(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5030221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ozpolat, E., & Akar, G. B. (2009). Automatic detection of learning styles for an e-learning system. Computers & Education, 53(2), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pithers, R. T. (2002). Cognitive learning style: A review of the field dependent field independent approach. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820200200191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Popescu, E. (2010). Adaptation provisioning with respect to learning styles in a Web-based educational system: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00364.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rogers, P. (2011). Student online course performance: Does learning style matter? Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 12, 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers, P. R., & McNeil, K. (2009). Student learning styles and online course performance: An empirical examination of student success in web-based management courses. Business Education Digest, 18, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sangineto, E., Capuano, N., Gaeta, M., & Micarelli, A. (2008). Adaptive course generation through learning styles representation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 7, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-007-0101-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shannon, E., & David, S. B. (2012). Learning style and its importance in Education.

  40. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ, 43(6), 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sun, S., Joy, M., & Griffiths, N. (2007). The use of learning objects and learning styles in a multi-agent education system. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(3), 381.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Surjono, H. D. (2015). The effects of multimedia and learning style on student achievement in online electronics course. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Truong, H. M. (2016). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tseng, J. C. R., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Computers & Education, 51, 776–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang, T., Hwang, G., & Yang, S. J. (2013). Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students’ learning styles and cognitive styles. Educational Technology and Society, 16, 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific search at King Saud University for its funding this Research group No. RG #‐1436‐033.

Funding

This research is not funded by any resource.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uthman Alturki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The research has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Bishouty, M.M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U. et al. Use of Felder and Silverman learning style model for online course design. Education Tech Research Dev 67, 161–177 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9634-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Course analysis
  • Course design
  • Learning management system
  • Learning style
  • Online education