Advertisement

Grounding the flipped classroom approach in the foundations of educational technology

  • Chung Kwan LoEmail author
Development Article

Abstract

The flipped classroom approach is becoming increasingly popular. This instructional approach allows more in-class time to be spent on interactive learning activities, as the direct lecturing component is shifted outside the classroom through instructional videos. However, despite growing interest in the flipped classroom approach, no robust frameworks have been developed for the design or school/faculty-wide implementation of flipped classrooms. The aim of this article is to provide a foundation for the flipped classroom approach in Spector’s (Foundations of educational technology: integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives, Routledge, New York, 2016) model of six pillars of educational technology. After reviewing previous discussion of the flipped classroom approach, each pillar (i.e., communication, interaction, environment, culture, instruction, and learning) is discussed in the context of flipped learning. Using Spector’s (2016) framework and drawing on relevant theories and empirical findings, 10 recommendations are made. These recommendations are particularly useful for the school/faculty-wide implementation of flipped classrooms. As the foundational framework proposed in this article is only preliminary, further studies (e.g., design-based research) are recommended to increase the robustness of the design framework and ultimately improve educational practices.

Keywords

Flipped classroom Inverted classroom Instructional approach Educational technology 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkaraju, S. (2016). The role of flipped learning in managing the cognitive load of a threshold concept in physiology. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(3), 28–43.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, L., & Brennan, J. P. (2015). An experiment in “flipped” teaching in freshman calculus. PRIMUS, 25(9–10), 861–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Artino, A. R., Jr. (2008). Cognitive load theory and the role of learner experience: An abbreviated review for educational practitioners. AACE Journal, 16(4), 425–439.Google Scholar
  9. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2008). Remixing chemistry class. Learning and Leading with Technology, 36(4), 24–27.Google Scholar
  10. Bernard, J. S. (2015). The flipped classroom: Fertile ground for nursing education research. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 99–109.Google Scholar
  11. Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134–142.Google Scholar
  13. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 120th ASEE National Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA (Paper ID 6219). Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York, NY: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2005). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  19. Critz, C. M., & Knight, D. (2013). Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educator, 38(5), 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies, R., Dean, D., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Egbert, J., Herman, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Flipped instruction in English language teacher education: A design-based study in a complex, open-ended learning environment. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 19(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
  23. Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57(6), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flynn, A. B. (2015). Structure and evaluation of flipped chemistry courses: Organic & spectroscopy, large and small, first to third year, English and French. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Education Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galway, L. P., Corbett, K. K., Takaro, T. K., Tairyan, K., & Frank, E. (2014). A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Medical Education, 14, article 181.Google Scholar
  28. Gaughan, J. E. (2014). The flipped classroom in world history. History Teacher, 47(2), 221–244.Google Scholar
  29. Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Chrisochoides, N. (2014). Reviewing the flipped classroom research: reflections for computer science education. In Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference (pp. 23–29). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  30. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross, B., Marinari, M., Hoffman, M., DeSimone, K., & Burke, P. (2015). Flipped @ SBU: Student satisfaction and the college classroom. Educational Research Quarterly, 39(2), 36–52.Google Scholar
  32. Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hotle, S. L., & Garrow, L. A. (2016). Effects of the traditional and flipped classrooms on undergraduate student opinions and success. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huang, Y. N., & Hong, Z. R. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huber, E., & Werner, A. (2016). A review of the literature on flipping the STEM classroom: Preliminary findings. In S. Barker, S. Dawson, A. Pardo, & C. Colvin (Eds.), Show me the learning. Proceedings ASCILITE 2016 Adelaide (pp. 267–274).Google Scholar
  36. Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. D. M. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(1), article 5.Google Scholar
  37. Jungić, V., Kaur, H., Mulholland, J., & Xin, C. (2015). On flipping the classroom in large first year calculus courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 508–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2017). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.12548/pdf.
  39. Khanova, J., McLaughlin, J. E., Rhoney, D. H., Roth, M. T., & Harris, S. (2015a). Student perceptions of a flipped pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(9), article 140.Google Scholar
  40. Khanova, J., Roth, M. T., Rodgers, J. E., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2015b). Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Medical Education, 49(10), 1038–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017a). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), article 4.Google Scholar
  43. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017b). Using “first principles of instruction” to design mathematics flipped classroom: The findings of two exploratory studies. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 222–236.Google Scholar
  44. Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 45(3), 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maciejewski, W. (2016). Flipping the calculus classroom: An evaluative study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35(4), 187–201.Google Scholar
  46. Marcum, T. M., & Perry, S. J. (2015). Flips and flops: A new approach to a traditonal law course. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 32(2), 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mattei, M. D., & Ennis, E. (2014). Continuous, real-time assessment of every student’s progress in the flipped higher education classroom using Nearpod. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  49. Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McGivney-Burelle, J., & Xue, F. (2013). Flipping calculus. PRIMUS, 23(5), 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2014). Educational design research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 131–140). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T., Gharkholonarehe, N., & Mumper, R. J. (2013). Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), article 196.Google Scholar
  55. Miller, C. L. (2016). A full flip: One Catholic university’s journey with campus-wide flipped instruction. Journal of Catholic Education, 20(1), 56–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mok, H. N. (2014). Teaching tip: The flipped classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(1), 7–11.Google Scholar
  57. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32(1), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morgan, H., McLean, K., Chapman, C., Fitzgerald, J., Yousuf, A., & Hammoud, M. (2015). The flipped classroom for medical students. The Clinical Teacher, 12(3), 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to education practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.Google Scholar
  60. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pannabecker, V., Barroso, C. S., & Lehmann, J. (2014). The flipped classroom: Student-driven library research sessions for nutrition education. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 19(3–4), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Petrillo, J. (2016). On flipping first-semester calculus: A case study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Porcaro, P. A., Jackson, D. E., McLaughlin, P. M., & O’Malley, C. J. (2016). Curriculum design of a flipped classroom to enhance haematology learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Presti, C. R. (2016). The flipped learning approach in nursing education: A literature review. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(5), 252–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ramnanan, C. J., & Pound, L. D. (2017). Advances in medical education and practice: Student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 8, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reddan, G., McNally, B., & Chipperfield, J. (2016). Flipping the classroom in an undergraduate sports coaching course. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 11(2), 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16–20.Google Scholar
  69. Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: Emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 758–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seery, M. K., & Donnelly, R. (2012). The implementation of pre-lecture resources to reduce in-class cognitive load: A case study for higher education chemistry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seyedmonir, B., Barry, K., & Seyedmonir, M. (2014). Developing a community of practice (CoP) through interdisciplinary research on flipped classrooms. Internet Learning, 3(1), article 9.Google Scholar
  73. Snyder, C., Paska, L. M., & Besozzi, D. (2014). Cast from the past: Using screencasting in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 105(6), 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spector, J. M. (2016). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Turan, Z., & Goktas, Y. (2016). The flipped classroom: Instructional efficiency and impact of achievement and cognitive load levels. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4), 51–62.Google Scholar
  76. Van Sickle, J. (2016). Discrepancies between student perception and achievement of learning outcomes in a flipped classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vaughan, M. (2014). Flipping the learning: An investigation into the use of the flipped classroom model in an introductory teaching course. Education Research and Perspectives, 41(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
  78. Vazquez, J. J., & Chiang, E. P. (2015). Flipping out! A case study on how to flip the principles of economics classroom. International Advances in Economic Research, 21, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Wang, Y. H. (2016). Could a mobile-assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical Chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, T. (2017). Overcoming barriers to ‘flip’: building teacher’s capacity for the adoption of flipped classroom in Hong Kong secondary schools. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), article 6.Google Scholar
  82. Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weaver, G. C., & Sturtevant, H. G. (2015). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a flipped format general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1437–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Westermann, E. B. (2014). A half-flipped classroom or an alternative approach? Primary sources and blended learning. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(2), 43–57.Google Scholar
  85. Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Information and Technology Studies, Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPok Fu LamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations