Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A technological pedagogical content knowledge based instructional design model: a third version implementation study in a technology integration course

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the third version of a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) based instructional design model that incorporates the distinctive, transformative, and integrative views of TPACK into a comprehensive actionable framework. Strategies of relating TPACK domains to real-life learning experiences, role-playing, and teachers as designers were developed based on the three views and integrated into the third version of the model. The model was then applied in a teacher education undergraduate course on technology integration. A case study approach was used. Data were collected from the participants’ discussion worksheets, lesson designs, and the researchers’ field observation notes. Data analysis results suggest that the strategies integrated into the model helped the participants deepen their understanding of student-centered technology applications and practice TPACK. Findings, implications, and future research possibilities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Computers & Education, 45(4), 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2008). TPCK in pre-service teacher education: Preparing primary education students to teach with technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, NY. Retrieved September 21, 2016, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.476.5467&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC Digest. Retrieved January 11, 2016, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf

  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C.-S., Koh, J. H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers’ concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second- order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E., Dirksen, D. J., & George, A. A. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: Levels of use. Austin, TX: SEDL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S. J., & Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C., Kim, M., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2009). Preservice educator learning in a simulated teaching environment. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009–society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 938–946). Charleston, SC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. J., & Kim, C. (2014a). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. J., & Kim, C. (2014b). The second prototype of the development of a TPACK-based instructional design model: An implementation study in a technology integration course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 297–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). Retrieved May 1, 2017, from http://217.160.35.246/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-e.pdf

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouza, C., & Karchmer-Klein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of case development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2007). Mathematics teaching today: Improving practice, improving students learning (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, A. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Frank, J. L. (2009). School-based consultants as change facilitators: An adaptation of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM) to support implementation of research-based practices. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19, 300–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science Education Resource Center. (2012). Google earth making a glacier guided tour. Retrieved February, 2016, from http://serc.carleton.edu/details/files/10228.html

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, M. (2010). The influence of technology skills on preservice and inservice teachers’ perceived ability to integrate technology. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2010–world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 2193–2202). Orlando, Florida: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Swain, C. (2006). Preservice teachers self-assessment using technology: Determining what is worthwhile and looking for changes in daily teaching and learning practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3). Retrieved April 5, 2017, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-3/tellis2.html

  • Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., & Wulff, A. (2006). High school teachers’ course designs and their professional knowledge of online teaching. Informatics in Education, 5(2), 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Career and Information Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

    Chia-Jung Lee & ChanMin Kim

Authors
  1. Chia-Jung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ChanMin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-Jung Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, CJ., Kim, C. A technological pedagogical content knowledge based instructional design model: a third version implementation study in a technology integration course. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 1627–1654 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9544-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9544-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation