Abstract
This article provides a review of theoretical approaches to model-based learning and related research. In accordance with the definition of model-based learning as an acquisition and utilization of mental models by learners, the first section centers on mental model theory. In accordance with epistemology of modeling the issues of semantics, ontology, and learning with models as well as structural aspects and functions of mental models (such as simplification, idealization, analogy, simulation) will be discussed. Starting with early theoretical approaches in the realm of cognitive science, the emphasis will be on recent theoretical developments in the field of reinforcement learning that distinguish between model-based and model-free learning. These new theoretical approaches confirm, to a large extent, the early theories of mental models but they also contribute new insights in age-related aspects of model-based learning. The second main section of the article provides a review of basic and applied research on model-based learning. A short overview of basic research on mental models aims at sketching an “overall picture” followed by a more detailed description and discussion of findings in the field of instructional research, especially with regard to K-12 STEM education and the support of model-based learning through teaching and technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abebe, S., & Davis, W. (2004). Transcendence in the public schools: The teacher as moral model. Journal of College and Character. doi:10.2202/1940-1639.1389.
Adams, W. K., et al. (2008). A study of educational simulations Part I—engagement and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3), 397–419.
Allard-Poesi, F. (1998). Representations and influence processes in groups: Towards a socio-cognitive perspective on cognition in organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(4), 395–420.
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85(4), 249–277.
Anzai, Y., & Yokoyama, T. (1984). Internal models in physics problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 397–450.
Appelbaum, L. G., et al. (2014). The dynamics of proactive and reactive cognitive control processes in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(5), 1021–1038.
Azevedo, R., et al. (2011). Adaptive content and process scaffolding: A key to facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(1), 106–140.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.
Barab, S. A., et al. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 37(7), 719–756.
Bayman, P., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Using conceptual models to teach BASIC computer programming. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 291–298.
Benbassat, J. (2014). Role modeling in medical education: The importance of a reflective imitation. Academic Medicine, 89(4), 550–554.
Berland, L., & Reiser, B. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55.
Betsch, T., & Fiedler, K. (1999). Understanding conjunction effects in probability judgment: The role of implicit mental models. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 75–93.
Bjønness, B., & Kolstø, S. D. (2015). Scaffolding open inquiry: How a teacher provides students with structure and space. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(3), 223–237.
Boerger, M. A., & Henley, T. B. (1999). The use of analogy in giving instructions. The Psychological Record, 49(2), 193–209.
Bowen, B., & Deluca, W. (2015). Comparing traditional versus alternative sequencing of instruction when using simulation modeling. Journal of STEM Education, 16(1), 5–10.
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106–113.
Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Mental models and social representations of hazards: The significance of identity processes. Journal of Risk Research, 4, 341–351.
Brewer, W. F. (1987). Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modelling cognition (pp. 187–197). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Brown, D. E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 17–34.
Bruner, J. S. (1975). From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3, 255–287.
Bryce, C. M., et al. (2016). Exploring models in the biology classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 78(1), 35–42.
Bu, L., & Hohenwarter, M. (2015). Modeling for dynamic mathematics. Toward technology-integrated aesthetic experiences in school mathematics. In X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler & J.M. Spector (Eds.), Emerging technologies for STEAM education. Full steam ahead (pp. 355–381). Cham: Springer.
Bucciarelli, M., & Daniele, M. (2015). Reasoning in moral conflicts. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3), 265–294.
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895–935.
Buckley, B. C. (2012a). Model-based learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Enclopedia of the sciences of learning (Vol. 5, pp. 2300–2303). New York: Springer.
Buckley, B. C. (2012b). Model-based teaching. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Enclopedia of the sciences of learning (Vol. 5, pp. 2312–2315). New York: Springer.
Buckley, B. C., et al. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica™: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 23–41.
Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182–197.
Campbell, T., et al. (2015). A review of modeling pedagogies: Pedagogical functions, discursive acts, and technology in modeling instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 159–176.
Cañas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., & Gonzalvo, P. (1994). Mental models and computer programming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(5), 795–811.
Chang, H. Y., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science Education, 94(1), 73–94.
Chang, H. Y., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. (2014). Using drawing technology to assess students’ visualizations of chemical reaction processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 355–369.
Chappell, P. (2012). A socio-cultural account of the role of imitation in instructed second language learning. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 3(1), 61–91.
Cheng, M. F., et al. (2014). Developing explanatory models of magnetic phenomena through model-based inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(3), 351–360.
Chiou, G. L., & Anderson, O. R. (2010). A study of undergraduate students understanding of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology-process analysis. Science Education, 94(5), 825–854.
Chiu, M. H., & Lin, J. W. (2002). Using multiple analogies for investigating fourth graders’ conceptual change in electricity. Chinese Journal of Research in Science Education, 10, 109–134.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students´ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241–1257.
Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041–1053.
Clement, J. J., & Steinberg, M. S. (2002). Step-wise evolution of mental models of electric circuits: A “learning-aloud” case study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 389–452.
Clement, J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
Cook, M. (2011). Teachers’ use of visual representations in the science classroom. Science Education International, 22(3), 175–184.
Cook, D. A., et al. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Teacher, 35, e867–e898.
Corpuz, E. D., & Rebello, N. S. (2011). Investigating students’ mental models and knowledge construction of microscopic friction. II. Implications for curriculum design and development. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020103.
Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636–650.
Crone, E. A., et al. (2008). Neural mechanisms supporting flexible performance adjustment during development. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(2), 165–177.
D’Angelo, C., et al. (2013). Review of computer-based simulations for STEM learning in K-12 education. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Darabi, A. A., Nelson, D. W., & Seel, N. M. (2009). Progression of mental models throughout the phases of a computer-based instructional simulation: Supportive information, practice, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 723–730.
Dass, K., Head, M. L., & Rushton, G. T. (2015). Building an understanding of how model-based inquiry is implemented in the high school chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education Research, 92(8), 1306–1314.
Davies, J., Nersessian, N. J., & Goel, A. K. (2005). Visual models in analogical problem solving. Foundations of Science, 10, 133–152.
Daw, N. D., et al. (2011). Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron, 69, 1204–1215.
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics, 14(1), 1–14.
Decker, J. H., et al. (2016). From creatures of habit to goal-directed learners. Tracking the developmental emergence of model-based reinforcement learning. Psychological Science, 15(2016), 0956797616639301.
Dede, C., et al. (1999). Multisensory immersion as a modeling environment for learning complex scientific concepts. In W. Feurzeig & N. Roberts (Eds.), Computer modeling and simulation in science education (pp. 282–319). New York: Springer.
Doll, B. B., Simon, D. A., & Daw, N. D. (2012). The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 1075–1081.
Dolphin, G., & Benoit, W. (2016). Students’ mental model development during historically contextualized inquiry: How the “Tectonic Plate” metaphor impeded the process. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 276–297.
Domangue, T. J., et al. (2004). Effects of model-based and memory-based processing on speed and accuracy of grammar string generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(5), 1002–1011.
Dori, Y. J., & Barak, M. (2001). Virtual and physical molecular modeling: Fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), 61–74.
Economides, M., et al. (2015). Model-based reasoning in humans becomes automatic with training. PLoS Computational Biolology, 11(9), e1004463. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004463.
Edsall, R., & Wentz, E. (2007). Comparing strategies for presenting concepts in introductory undergraduate geography: Physical models vs. computer visualization. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(3), 427–444.
Ehrlén, K. (2008). Children’s understanding of globes as a model of the earth: A problem of contextualizing. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 221–238.
Eppinger, B., Walter, M., Heekeren, H. R., & Li, S.-C. (2013). Of goals and habits: Age-related and individual differences in goal-directed decision-making. Frontiers in Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00253.
Ermentrout, B. (2002). Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems: A guide to Xppaut for researchers and students. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1993). The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: Critical reappraisal and revision. Cognition, 48, 1–20.
Farrar, K. M., Krcmar, M., & Nowak, K. L. (2006). Contextual features of violent video games, mental models, and aggression. Journal of Communication, 56(2), 387–405.
Feng, C. H. (2012). Analyzing the effect of modeling-oriented inquiry model on 8th grade students’ ability to identify the elements of scientific inquiry. Secondary Education, 63(1), 38–60.
Fiore, S. M., Cuevas, H. M., & Oser, R. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand connections: The facilitative effects of diagrams on mental model development and task performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 185–199.
Ford, B., & Hall, G. G. (1970). Model building—an educational philosophy for applied mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1(1), 77–83.
Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (Eds.). (2015). An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience. New York: Springer.
Fretz, E. B., et al. (2002). An investigation of software scaffolds supporting modeling practices. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 567–589.
Freudenthal, H. (Ed.). (1961). The concept and the role of the model in mathematics and natural and social sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Frick, A., Daum, M. M., Wilson, M., & Wilkening, F. (2009). Effects of actions on children’s and adults’ mental imagery. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 34–51.
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Scientific models. In S. Sarkar & J. Pfeifer (Eds.), The philosophy of science. An encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 740–749). New York: Routledge.
Furtak, E. M., et al. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modeling-based teaching in science education. Cham: Springer Nature.
Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M., & Nakhlel, M. (Eds.). (2008). Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. New York, NY: Springer.
Gilbert, J. K., & Rogers, W. A. (1999). Age-related differences in the acquisition, utilization, and extension of a spatial mental model. Journal of Gerontology, 54B(4), 246–255.
Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Gillan, C. M., et al. (2015). Model-based learning protects against forming habits. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(3), 523–536.
Gläscher, J., Daw, N., Dayan, P., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2010). States versus rewards: Dissociable neural prediction error signals underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning. Neuron, 66(4), 585–595.
Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. American Psychologist, 45(1), 29–39.
Glynn, S. M. (1997). Drawing mental models. The Science Teacher, 64(1), 30–32.
Glynn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: teaching with analogies. In S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, & M. Brückmann (Eds.), Four decades of research in science education: From curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 113–125). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891–894.
Gobert, J. D., & Pallant, A. (2004). Fostering students’ epistemologies of models via authentic model-based tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7–22.
Gobert, J. D., et al. (2011). Examining the relationship between students’ understanding of the nature of models and conceptual learning in biology, physics, and chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 653–684.
Gopnik, A., Griffiths, T. L., & Lucas, C. G. (2015). When younger learners can be better (or at least more open-minded) than older ones. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 87–92.
Gould, H., Tobochnik, J., & Christian, W. (2007). An introduction to computer simulation methods. Applications to physical systems (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gray, S. H. (1990). Using protocol analyses and drawings to study mental model construction during hypertext navigation. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 2, 359–378.
Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11.
Greeno, J. G. (1989). Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing (pp. 285–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grenier, R. S., & Dudzinska-Przesmitzki, D. (2015). A conceptual model for eliciting mental models using a composite methodology. Human Resource Development Review, 14(2), 163–184.
Gu, X., & Blackmore, K. L. (2015). A systematic review of agent-based modelling and simulation applications in the higher education domain. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 883–898.
Gubitzer, L. (2012). The 5-sector model of the economy. Vienna, Austria: University of Vienna.
Guerra-Ramos, M. T. (2011). Analogies as tools for meaning making in elementary science education: How do they work in classroom settings? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(1), 29–39.
Gustafsson, J. E., & Peterson, M. (2012). A computer simulation of the argument from disagreement. Synthesis, 184, 405–487.
Haider, S.I., Snead, D.R., & Bari, M.F. (2016). Medical students’ perceptions of clinical teachers as role model. PLoS ONE, 9 (11), Article 3:e0150478.
Hale-Hanes, C. (2015). Promoting student development of models and scientific inquiry skills in acid–base chemistry: An important skill development in preparation for AP chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(8), 1320–1324.
Hannafin, R. D., & Scott, B. N. (2001). Teaching and learning with dynamic geometry programs in student-centered learning environments. Computers in the Schools, 17(1), 121–141.
Harris, O. J., & Hartman, S. J. (2002). Organizational behavior. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
Harris, C. J., & Rooks, D. L. (2010). Managing inquiry-based science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 227–240.
Hart, D., & Fegley, S. (1994). Social imitation and the emergence of a mental model of self. In S. T. Parker, R. W. Mitchell, & M. L. Boccia (Eds.), Self-awareness in animals and humans: Developmental perspectives (pp. 149–165). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heidig, S., & Clarebout, G. (2011). Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning? Educational Research Review, 6(1), 27–54.
Henderson, L., & Tallman, J. (2006). Stimulated recall and mental models. Lanham, ML: Scarecrow Press Inc.
Henning, J. E. (2008). The art of discussion-based teaching. Opening up conversation in the classroom. New York: Routledge.
Hernández, M. I., Couso, D., & Pintó, R. (2015). Analyzing students’ learning progressions throughout a teaching sequence on acoustic properties of materials with a model-based inquiry approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 356–377.
Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling games in the Newtonian world. American Journal of Physics, 60(8), 732–748.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Hogan, K. (1999). Think aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1085–1109.
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Hokayem, H., & Schwarz, C. (2014). Engaging fifth graders in scientific modeling to learn about evaporation and condensation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 49–72.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps. Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ifenthaler, D., Pirnay-Dummer, P. N., & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding models for learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Norbert M. Seel. New York: Springer.
Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2011). A longitudinal perspective on inductive reasoning tasks: Illuminating the probability of change. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 538–549.
Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2013). Model-based reasoning. Computers & Education, 64, 131–142.
Ingersoll, B., & Schreibman, L. (2006). Teaching reciprocal imitation skills to young children with autism using a naturalistic behavioral approach: Effects on language, pretend play, and joint attention. Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, 36(4), 487–505.
Jeong, H., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35, 287–315.
Jin, H., et al. (2016). Promoting cognitive and social aspects of inquiry through classroom discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 319–343.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Mental models. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 469–499). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1995). Mental models, deductive reasoning, and the brain. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 999–1008). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). The history of mental models. In K. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical perspectives (pp. 179–212). New York: Psychology Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). How we reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jones, N. A., et al. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46–46.
Jones, R. M., et al. (2014). Adolescent-specific patterns of behavior and neural activity during social reinforcement learning. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 683–697.
Jonides, J., Nee, D. E., & Berman, M. G. (2006). What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind? So many examples, so little space. Cortex, 42, 414–427.
Kanno, T., Furuta, K., & Kitahara, Y. (2010). A model of team cognition based on mutual beliefs. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14(1), 38–52.
Keen, S. (1995). Finance and economic breakdown: Modelling minsky’s financial instability hypothesis. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17(4), 607–635.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teacing, 40(9), 898–921.
Kieras, D. E., & Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science, 8, 255–273.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Knauff, M., et al. (2003). Reasoning, models, and images: Behavioral measures and cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 559–573.
Koechlin, E., Ody, C., & Kouneiher, F. (2003). The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science, 302(14), 1181–1185.
Kontogeorgiou, A. M., Bellou, J., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2008). Being inside the quantum atom. PsychNology Journal, 6(1), 85–101.
Kopainsky, B., & Alessi, S. M. (2015). Effects of structural transparency in system dynamics simulators on performance and understanding. Systems, 3, 152–176.
Kopainsky, B., et al. (2015). Effects of prior exploration as an instructional strategy for systems dynamics. Simulation Gaming, 46(3–4), 293–321.
Krämer, N., & Bente, G. (2010). Personalizing e-Learning. The social effects of pedagogical agents. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 71–87.
Kuhn, D. (2007). Reasoning about multiple variables: Control of variables is not the only challenge. Science Education, 91(5), 710–726.
Kurland, D. M., & Pea, R. D. (1985). Children´s mental models of recursive logo programs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(2), 235–243.
Landriscina, F. (2013). Simulation and learning: A model-centered approach. New York: Springer.
Lane, S. M., et al. (2008). Facilitative interactions of model- and experience-based processes: Implications for type and flexibility of representation. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 157–169.
Larson, K. G., Long, G. R., & Briggs, M. W. (2012). Periodic properties and inquiry: Student mental models observed during a periodic table puzzle activity. Chemical Education Research, 89(12), 1491–1498.
Lee, J. (2015). Analysis of the refinement of shared mental models in science-gifted students’ collaborative problem solving process. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 1049–1062.
Lee, J., & Kim, J. B. (2013). What is shared in collaborative problem solving process of scientific gifted students? Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(6), 1099–1115.
Lee, S. W., Shimojo, S., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2014). Neural computations underlying arbitration between model-based and model-free learning. Neuron, 81(3), 687–699.
Lee, K., et al. (2015). MATLAB-based teaching modules in Biochemical engineering. Chemical Engineering Education, 49(2), 85–87.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2000). Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: Key components of models and modeling. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 361–383). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Liebrand, W. B. G., Nowak, A., & Hegselmann, R. (Eds.). (1998). Computer modeling of social processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lim, B. R. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 627–643.
Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model on similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403–418.
Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment: The partnership inquiry process. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 781–796.
Mahon, B. Z., & Cantlon, J. F. (2011). The specialization of function: Cognitive and neural perspectives. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28, 147–155.
Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603–630.
Markman, A. B. (1998). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mathieu, J. E., et al. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283.
Matteson, M. L. (2010). The impact of group interaction on shared cognition: An analysis of small group communication. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, 29, 37–106.
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43–64.
Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2013). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group Organization Management, 39(1), 3–32.
McGloin, R., et al. (2016). Modeling outcomes of violent video game play: Applying mental models and model matching to explain the relationship between user differences, game characteristics, enjoyment, and aggressive intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 442–451.
McGrath, D., et al. (2010). Student experiences of virtual reality: A case study in learning special relativity. American Journal of Physics, 78(8), 862–868.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78.
Merchant, Z., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40.
Milrad, M., Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2002). Model facilitated learning. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 13–27). London: Kogan Page.
Minsky, M. L. (1965). Matter, mind and models. Proceedings of the International Federation of Information Processing Congress, 1, 45–49.
Mulder, Y., Bollen, L., de Jong, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016). Scaffolding learning by modeling: The effects of partially worked out models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 502–523.
Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing two types of model progression in an inquiry learning environment with modelling facilities. Learning and Instruction, 21, 614–624.
Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2014). Using heuristic worked examples to promote inquiry-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 56–64.
Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2015). Simulation-based inquiry learning and computer modeling. Simulation Gaming, 46(3–4), 322–347.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nielsen, M., Simcock, G., & Jenkins, L. (2008). The effect of social engagement on 24-month-olds’ imitation from live and televised models. Developmental Science, 11(5), 722–731.
Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Orban de Xivry, J. J., & Ethier, V. (2008). Neural correlates of internal models. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(32), 7931–7932.
Orgill, M., & Bodner, G. (2004). What research tells us about using analogies to teach chemistry. Chemistry Education, 5(1), 15–32.
Otto, A. R., et al. (2013). Working-memory capacity protects model-based learning from stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(52), 20941–20946.
Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2012). Putting the social into social learning: Explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children’s copying behavior. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 182–192.
Park, S. K. (2016). Exploring the argumentation pattern in modeling-based learning about apparent motion of Mars. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(1), 87–107.
Passmore, C. M., Stewart, J., & Cartier, J. (2009). Model-based inquiry and school science: Creating connections. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 394–402.
Passmore, C. M., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1535–1554.
Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125–143.
Plummer, J. D., et al. (2015). Development of a learning progression for the formation of the solar system. International Journal of Science Education, 37(9), 1381–1401.
Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.
Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
Radvansky, G. A., Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, K. (1996). Fact retrieval in younger and older adults: The role of mental models. Psychology and Aging, 11(2), 258–271.
Rand, W., & Rust, R. T. (2011). Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 181–193.
Rapp, D. N. (2005). Mental models: Theoretical issues for visualizations in science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 43–60). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rauh, R., et al. (2005). Preferred and alternative mental models in spatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 239–269.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions and New media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richland, L. E., & McDonough, I. M. (2010). Learning by analogy: Discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 28–43.
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249–271.
Riley, D. (1990). Learning about systems by making models. Computers in Education, 13(1–3), 255–263.
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction. Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 39, 12–19.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Davies, J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implications of the mental models approach for cultivation theory. Communications, 29(3), 345–363.
Rumelhart, D.E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J.L., & Hinton, G.E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart, & The PDP research group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Psychological and biological models (Vol 2, pp. 7–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ryoo, K. L., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Designing guidance for interpreting dynamic visualizations: Generating versus reading explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 147–174.
Sanderse, W. (2013). The meaning of role modeling in moral and character education. Journal of Moral Education, 42(1), 28–42.
Sandoval, W., & Reiser, B. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372.
Sanger, M. J., Brecheisen, D. M., & Hynek, B. M. (2001). Can computer animations affect college biology students’ conceptions about diffusion and osmosis? The American Biology Teacher, 63(2), 104–109.
Santos, C. M., Passos, A. M., & Uitdewilligen, S. (2016). When shared cognition leads to closed minds: Temporal mental models, team learning, adaptation and performance. European Management Journal, 34(3), 258–268.
Scalise, K., et al. (2011). Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1050–1078.
Schichl, H. (2003). Models and the history of moedling. In H. Kallrath (Ed.), Modeling languages in mathematical optimization (pp. 25–36). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Schroeder, N. L., & Adesope, O. O. (2014). A systematic review of pedagogical agents’ persona, motivation, and cognitive load implications for learners. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(3), 229–251.
Schuitema, J., ten Dam, G., & Veugelers, W. (2008). Teaching strateges for moral education: A review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 69–89.
Schwarz, C. V., & Gwekwerere, Y. N. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-9 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158–186.
Schwarz, C. V., et al. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654.
Seel, N.M. (1991). Weltwissen und mental Modelle. Göttingen: Hogrefe [World knowledge and mental models].
Seel, N. M. (1995). Mental models, knowledge transfer, and teaching strategies. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 12(3), 197–213.
Seel, N. M. (1999). Educational diagnosis of mental models: Assessment problems and technology-based solutions. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(2), 153–185.
Seel, N. M. (2003). Model-centered learning and instruction. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 1(1), 59–85.
Seel, N. M. (2014). Model-based learning and performance. In J. M. Spector et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communication and technology (4th ed., pp. 465–484). New York: Springer.
Seel, N. M., Al-Diban, S., & Blumschein, P. (2000). Mental models and instructional planning. In M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding Complexity (pp. 129–158). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
Seel, N. M., Darabi, A. A., & Nelson, D. W. (2006). A dynamic mental model approach to examine schema development in performing a complex troubleshooting task: Retention of mental models. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 4, 309–329.
Seel, N. M., & Dinter, F. R. (1995). Instruction and mental model progression: Learner-dependent effects of teaching strategies on knowledge acquisition and anlogical transfer. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 4–35.
Seeliger, R. (1948). Analogien und Modelle in der Physikdidaktik. Studium Generale, 1 (3), 125–137. [Analogies and models in physics didactics].
Sein, M. K., & Bostrom, R. P. (1989). Individual differences and conceptual models in training novice users. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 197–229.
Sharp, D. L. M., et al. (1995). Dynamic visual support for story comprehension and mental model building by young, at-risk children. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 25–42.
Sharp, M. E., et al. (2016). Dopamine selectively remediates ‘model-based’ reward learning: A computational approach. Brain, 139, 355–364.
Shih, Y.-F., & Alessi, S. M. (1993). Mental models and transfer of learning in computer programming. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 154–175.
Shirehjini, A. A. N., et al. (2016). Mental model development using collaborative 3D virtual environments. In N. Streitz & P. Markopoulos (Eds.), Distributed, ambient and pervasive interactions (pp. 279–290). Cham: Springer.
Skatova, A., Chan, P. A., & Daw, N. D. (2013). Extraversion differentiates between model-based and model-free strategies in a reinforcement learning task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00525.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370.
Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 221–283.
Sokolowski, J. A., & Banks, C. M. (2009). Principles of modeling and simulation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Spezzini, S. (2010). Effects of visual analogies on learner outcomes: Bridging from the known to the unknown, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4 (2), Article 11.
Stavy, R. (2006). Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 305–313.
Steinbuch, K. (1961). Automat und Mensch. Über menschliche und maschinelle Intelligenz. Berlin: Springer.
Strevens, M. (2013). No understanding without explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 44, 510–515.
Stull, A. T., Barrett, T., & Hegarty, M. (2013). Usability of concrete and virtual models in chemistry instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2546–2556.
Stull, A. T., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Model manipulation and learning: Fostering representational competence with virtual and concrete models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 509–527.
Stull, A. T., et al. (2016). Promoting representational competence with molecular models in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(6), 994–1001.
Sun, D., Looi, C.-K., & Xie, W. (2014). Collaborative inquiry with a web-based science learning environment: When teachers enact it differently. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 390–403.
Supasorn, S. (2015). Grade 12 students’ conceptual understanding and mental models of galvanic cells before and after learning by using small-scale experiments in conjunction with a model kit. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 393–407.
Swaak, J., van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. (1998). Supporting simulation-based learning: the effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 8, 235–252.
Tapiero, I. (2007). Situation models and levels of coherence. Toward a definition of comprehension. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Tasker, R., & Dalton, R. (2006). Research into practice: Visualization of the molecular world using animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 141–159.
Thagard, P. (2010). How brains make mental models. In L. Magnani et al. (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology (pp. 447–461). Berlin: Springer.
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2009). Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 259–263.
Tien, L. T., Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (1999). The MORE cycle: Guiding students’ thinking in the laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 18(5), 318–324.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trundle, K. C., & Bell, R. L. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education, 54, 1078–1088.
Turchin, P. (2004). Historical dynamics: Why states rise and fall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.
Tversky, B., et al. (1994). Spatial mental models from descriptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 656–668.
Ugur, G., et al. (2012). The effects of analogy on students’ understanding of direct current circuits and attitudes towards physics lessons. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 211–223.
Van Hook, S., & Huziak-Clark, T. (2008). Lift, squeeze, stretch, and twist: Research-based inquiry physics experiences (RIPE) of energy for kindergartners. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 1–16.
Van Hook, S., et al. (2009). Developing an understanding of inquiry by teachers and graduate student scientists through a collaborative professional development program. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 30–61.
van Joolingen, W. R., et al. (2015). Understanding elementary astronomy by making drawing-based models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2), 256–264.
van Zee, E., et al. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190.
Vendetti, M. S., et al. (2015). Analogical reasoning in the classroom: Insights from cognitive science. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(2), 100–106.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models. Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Weiss, W., & D’Mello, C. (1997). Fundamentals of model theory. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Werhane, P. C., et al. (2011). Social constructivism, mental models, and problems of obedience. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 103–118.
West, M. (2011). Developing high quality data models. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufman.
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modelling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
Wieman, C., & Perkins, K. (2006). A powerful tool for teaching science. Nature Physics, 2, 290–292.
Wijnen, F. M., et al. (2015). The potential of learning from erroneous models: Comparing three types of model instruction. System Dynamics Review, 31(4), 250–270.
Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H., Gravel, B. E., & Macrander, C. A. (2015). Exploring shifts in middle school learners’ modeling activity while generating drawings, animations, and computational simulations of molecular diffusion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2), 396–415.
Williams, E. G., & Clement, J. J. (2014). Identifying multiple levels of discussion-based teaching strategies for constructing scientific models. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 82–107.
Wilson, J. R., & Rutherford, A. (1989). Mental models: Theory and application in human factors. Human Factors, 31, 617–634.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1987). False models as means to truer theories. In M. Nitecki (Ed.), Neutral models in biology (pp. 23–55). London: Oxford University Press.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92, 941–967.
Wojnowski, B. S., & Pea, C. H. (2014). Models and approaches to STEM professional development. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842.
Xavier, J., Tilmont, E., & Bonnot, O. (2013). Children’s synchrony and rhythmicity in imitation of peers: Toward a developmental model of empathy. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 107(4), 291–297.
Zhang, T., Kaber, D., & Hsiang, S. (2008). Characterisation of mental models in a virtual reality-based multitasking scenario using measures of situation awareness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(1–2), 99–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seel, N.M. Model-based learning: a synthesis of theory and research. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 931–966 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9507-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9507-9