Guided by Vygotsky’s social learning theory, this study reports a 24-week investigation on whether regular use of Istation®, an integrated learning system used by approximately 4 million students in the United States, had an effect on the early literacy achievement of children in twelve kindergarten classrooms. A mixed-method, quasi-experimental design was constructed using propensity scores. Also investigated were the effects of the level of teacher literacy support on early literacy achievement and the interaction between Istation® use and the level of teacher literacy support. A descriptive discriminant analysis was performed to determine the main effect of Istation®. The level of teacher support and the interaction effect was then tested using a multivariate between-subject analysis. Results indicated that Istation® did have a statistically significant effect on the early literacy skills of the kindergarten students studied and could explain 17.7% of the variance in group differences. Teacher literacy support and the interaction between teacher support and Istation® were not significant. This study considers the relationship between technology and early literacy and concludes that Istation® can serve as a more knowledgeable other as students develop some early literacy skills; however, teachers are still needed to provide complete literacy instruction for young students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 60, 364–373.
Ankrum, J., Genest, M., & Belcastro, E. (2014). The power of verbal scaffolding: ‘Showing’ beginning readers how to use reading strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 39–47.
Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 399–424.
Austin, P. C. (2014). A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Statistics in Medicine, 33, 1057–1069.
Bauserman, K., Cassady, J. C., Smith, L. L., & Stroud, J. C. (2005). Kindergarten literacy achievement: The effects of the PLATO integrated learning system. Reading Research and Instruction, 44, 49–60.
Beaver, J. M. (2006). Teacher guide: Developmental reading assessment, grades K–3 (2nd ed.). Parsippany, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Below, J. L., Skinner, C. H., Fearrington, J. Y., & Sorrell, C. A. (2010). Gender differences in early literacy: Analysis of kindergarten through fifth-grade dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills probes. School Psychology Review, 39, 240–257.
Bishop, A. G., & League, M. B. (2006). Identifying a multivariate screening model to predict reading difficulties at the onset of kindergarten: A longitudinal analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 235–252.
Blair, T. R., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2007). The effective teacher of reading: Considering the “what” and “how” of instruction. Reading Teacher, 60, 432–438.
Boonen, T., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2014). Teacher effects on student achievement in first grade: Which aspects matter most? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 126–152.
Burnett, C., & Daniels, K. (2015). Technology and literacy in the early years: Framing young children’s meaning-making with new technologies. In S. Garvis & N. Lemon (Eds.), Understanding digital technologies and young children: An international perspective (pp. 18–27). New York: Routledge.
Cambourne, B. (1995). Toward an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 49, 182–190.
Cassady, J. C., & Smith, L. L. (2004). The impact of a reading-focused integrated learning system on phonological awareness in kindergarten. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 947–964.
Cassady, J. C., & Smith, L. L. (2005). The impact of a structured integrated learning system on first-grade students’ reading gains. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 361–376.
Chatterj, M. (2006). Reading achievement gaps, correlates, and moderators of early reading achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study (ECLS) kindergarten to first grade sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 489–507.
Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Clay, M. M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (2010). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
D’Angiulli, A., Siegel, L. S., & Hertzman, C. (2004). Schooling, socioeconomic context and literacy development. Educational Psychology, 24, 867–883.
Ehri, L. C., & Roberts, T. (2006). The roots of learning to read and write: Acquisition of letters and phonemic awareness. In D. K. Dickenson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 113–131). New York: The Guilford Press.
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6, 50–72.
Gottardo, A., & Mueller, J. (2009). Are first and second language factors related in predicting L2 reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 330–344.
Graham, S. E., & Kurleander, M. (2011). Using propensity scores in educational research: General principals and practical applications. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 340–353.
Hall, K. (2003). Effective literacy teaching in the early years of school: A review of the evidence. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 315–326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Henson, R.K. (2002, April). The logic and interpretation of structure coefficients in multivariate general linear model analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 467 381).
Huang, F. L., & Invernizzi, M. A. (2012). The association of kindergarten entry age with early literacy outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 441.
Huberty, C. J. (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: Wiley.
Istation® (2015). Retrieved from www.Istation.com.
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, W. L., & Lester, J. C. (2016). Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 25–36.
Johnson, E. P., Perry, J., & Shamir, J. (2010). Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation. Computers & Education, 55(1), 209–217.
Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 569–596.
Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2016). Research-based design of pedagogical agent roles: A review, progress, and recommendations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 160–169.
Konstantopoulous, S., & Chung, V. (2011). The persistence of teacher effects in elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 361–386.
Labbo, L. D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Theory and research into practice: Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 478–492.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New technologies in early childhood literacy research: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3, 59–82.
Lee, J., & Park, O. (2007). Adaptive instructional systems. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 469–484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mathes, P., Torgesen, J., & Herron, J. (2012). Technical report: Istation ® ’s indicators of progress: Early reading version 4. Retrieved from http://www.Istation.com/Content/downloads/studies/er_technical_report.pdf.
McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (1998). Maximising the language and learning link in computer learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 125–136.
Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington DC: National Institute for Literacy.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington DC: UC Government Printing Office.
Osborne, J. W. (2010). Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(12), 1–9.
Paterson, W. A., Henry, J. J., O’Quin, K., Ceprano, M. A., & Blue, E. V. (2003). Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated learning system on early emergent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 172–207.
Philips, B. M., & Torgesen, J. K. (2006). Phonemic awareness and reading: Beyond the growth of initial reading accuracy. In D. K. Dickenson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 101–112). New York: The Guilford Press.
Ponitz, C., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2011). Contexts of reading instruction: Implications for literacy skills and kindergarteners’ behavioral engagement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 157–168.
Pressley, M., Allington, R., Morrow, L., Baker, K., Nelson, E., Wharton-McDonald, R.,…Woo, D. (1998). The nature of effective first-grade literacy instruction. The National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/pressley1stgrade11007.pdf.
PRWeb. (2014). Istation reading improves early literacy growth for pre-k–kindergarten students, study confirms (Press release). Retrieved from http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08/prweb12101490.htm.
Ready, D. D. (2010). Socioeconomic disadvantage, school attendance, and early cognitive development: The differential effects of school exposure. Sociology of Education, 83, 271–286.
Reutzel, D. R. (2015). Early literacy research: Findings primary-grade teachers will want to know. The Reading Teacher, 69, 14–24.
Reutzel, D. R., Petscher, Y., & Spichtig, A. N. (2012). Exploring the value added of a guided, silent reading intervention: Effects on struggling third-grade readers’ achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 404–415.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265–282.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York: Merrill.
Skinner, (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.
Snow, C. E., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Sulzby, E., & Teale, W. (1991). Emergent literacy. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 727–757). New York: Longman.
Taylor, J., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Genetic influence on literacy constructs in kindergarten and first grade: Evidence from a diverse twin sample. Behavior Genetics, 40, 591–602.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Washington DC: Sage.
Thoemmes, F. J., & Kim, E. S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 90–118.
Thompkins, G. E. (2014). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tracey, D. H., & Young, J. W. (2007). Technology and early literacy: The impact of an integrated learning system on high-risk kindergartners’ achievement. Reading Psychology, 28, 443–467.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolfe, P. (2010). Brain matters: Translating researching into classroom practice. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Yesil-Dagli, U. (2011). Predicting ELL students’ beginning first grade English oral reading fluency from initial kindergarten vocabulary, letter names, and phonological awareness skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 15–29.
Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 187–202.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Putman, R.S. Technology versus teachers in the early literacy classroom: an investigation of the effectiveness of the Istation integrated learning system. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 1153–1174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9499-5
- Early literacy
- Integrated learning systems
- Educational technology
- Propensity scores