Technology versus teachers in the early literacy classroom: an investigation of the effectiveness of the Istation integrated learning system
Guided by Vygotsky’s social learning theory, this study reports a 24-week investigation on whether regular use of Istation®, an integrated learning system used by approximately 4 million students in the United States, had an effect on the early literacy achievement of children in twelve kindergarten classrooms. A mixed-method, quasi-experimental design was constructed using propensity scores. Also investigated were the effects of the level of teacher literacy support on early literacy achievement and the interaction between Istation® use and the level of teacher literacy support. A descriptive discriminant analysis was performed to determine the main effect of Istation®. The level of teacher support and the interaction effect was then tested using a multivariate between-subject analysis. Results indicated that Istation® did have a statistically significant effect on the early literacy skills of the kindergarten students studied and could explain 17.7% of the variance in group differences. Teacher literacy support and the interaction between teacher support and Istation® were not significant. This study considers the relationship between technology and early literacy and concludes that Istation® can serve as a more knowledgeable other as students develop some early literacy skills; however, teachers are still needed to provide complete literacy instruction for young students.
KeywordsEarly literacy Integrated learning systems Educational technology Propensity scores Istation
- Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Beaver, J. M. (2006). Teacher guide: Developmental reading assessment, grades K–3 (2nd ed.). Parsippany, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
- Below, J. L., Skinner, C. H., Fearrington, J. Y., & Sorrell, C. A. (2010). Gender differences in early literacy: Analysis of kindergarten through fifth-grade dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills probes. School Psychology Review, 39, 240–257.Google Scholar
- Burnett, C., & Daniels, K. (2015). Technology and literacy in the early years: Framing young children’s meaning-making with new technologies. In S. Garvis & N. Lemon (Eds.), Understanding digital technologies and young children: An international perspective (pp. 18–27). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Clay, M. M. (2002). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, P. M., & Allington, R. L. (2010). Classrooms that work: They can all read and write (5th ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Ehri, L. C., & Roberts, T. (2006). The roots of learning to read and write: Acquisition of letters and phonemic awareness. In D. K. Dickenson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 113–131). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Henson, R.K. (2002, April). The logic and interpretation of structure coefficients in multivariate general linear model analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 467 381).Google Scholar
- Huberty, C. J. (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Istation® (2015). Retrieved from www.Istation.com.
- Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
- Lee, J., & Park, O. (2007). Adaptive instructional systems. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 469–484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Mathes, P., Torgesen, J., & Herron, J. (2012). Technical report: Istation ® ’s indicators of progress: Early reading version 4. Retrieved from http://www.Istation.com/Content/downloads/studies/er_technical_report.pdf.
- Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- National Center for Educational Statistics (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf.
- National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington DC: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington DC: UC Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J. W. (2010). Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(12), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Philips, B. M., & Torgesen, J. K. (2006). Phonemic awareness and reading: Beyond the growth of initial reading accuracy. In D. K. Dickenson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 101–112). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Pressley, M., Allington, R., Morrow, L., Baker, K., Nelson, E., Wharton-McDonald, R.,…Woo, D. (1998). The nature of effective first-grade literacy instruction. The National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/pressley1stgrade11007.pdf.
- PRWeb. (2014). Istation reading improves early literacy growth for pre-k–kindergarten students, study confirms (Press release). Retrieved from http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08/prweb12101490.htm.
- Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York: Merrill.Google Scholar
- Skinner, (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.Google Scholar
- Snow, C. E., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Sulzby, E., & Teale, W. (1991). Emergent literacy. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 727–757). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Washington DC: Sage.Google Scholar
- Thompkins, G. E. (2014). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, P. (2010). Brain matters: Translating researching into classroom practice. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar