How can we better design games, such as role-playing video games (RPGs), to support the practice of ethical thinking? Ethical thinking is a critical component of twenty-first century citizenship and we need to design ways to creatively support its practice. This study investigates how male participants, ages 18–34, make ethical decisions in three in-game scenarios in Fable III, an RPG, and one additional scenario. The decision-making processes of thirty participants were analyzed; twenty were randomly assigned to play Fable III and ten were assigned to a control condition of written ethical scenarios. Results suggested that participants practiced a variety of ethical thinking skills and thought processes in both conditions, including reasoning-, empathy-, reflection-, and information gathering-related skills and thought processes. Three hypotheses were investigated and detailed, and any significant differences or similarities that emerged between conditions and across game scenarios were explored. Based on this analysis, four preliminary design principles were described.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alderman, J. (2010). Fable 2 sold 3.5 m units, goal for Fable 3 is 5 m, GamerInvestments.com. Retrieved from http://gamerinvestments.com/videogamestocks/index.php/2010/03/11/.
Belman, J., & Flanagan, M. (2010). Designing games to foster empathy. Cognitive Technology, 14(2), 5–15.
Belman, J., Nussenbaum, H., Flanagan, M., Diamond, J. (2011). Grow-A-game: A tool for values conscious design and analysis of digital games. Proceedings of DIGRA 2011 Conference. Hilversum: The Netherlands, pp. 14–17.
Bertozzi, E. (2014). Using games to teach, practice, and encourage interest in STEM subjects. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E. W., Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., Manea, M., Ka¨rki, A., & van Rosmalen, P. (2014). A narrative literature review of games, animations and simulations to teach research methods and statistics. Computers & Education, 74, 1–14.
Bradley, L. J., & Hendricks, C. B. (2008). Ethical decision making: Basic issues. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 16, 261–263.
Brown, K. M. (1994). Using role play to integrate ethics into the business curriculum a financial management example. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 105–110.
Campbell, A. V., Chin, J., & Voo, T. C. (2007). How can we know that ethics education produces ethical doctors? Medical Teacher, 29, 431–436.
Consalvo, M. (2005). Rule sets, cheating, and magic circles: Studying games and ethics. International Review of Information Ethics, 4, 8–12.
Cottone, R. R., & Claus, R. E. (2000). Ethical decision-making models: A review of the literature. Journal of Counseling and Development: JCD, 78, 275–283.
Deci, E. (1996). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. London: Penguin.
Doorn, N., & Kroesen, J. O. (2013). Using and developing role plays in teaching aimed at preparing for social responsibility. Science & Engineering Ethics, 19, 1513–1527.
Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2006). Overview of research on the educational use of video games. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 3. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2006/03/overview_of_research_on_the_educationaluseof_video_games.
Elliott, D. (2007). Ethics in the first person. A guide to teaching and learning practical ethics. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, Publishers.
ESA. (2014). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Retrieved from http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/esa_ef_2014.pdf.
Ferdig, R., & Pytash, K. (2014). The use of video games for literacy acquisition and studying literate practices. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Flanagan, M., Nissenbaum, H., Belman, J., & Diamond, J. (2007). A method for discovering values in digital games. In DIGRA 2007 conference proceedings. Tokyo, Japan.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harwell, D. (2014). More women play video games than boys, and other surprising facts lost in the mess of Gamergate. Washington Post. Retrieved October 17, 2014, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/10/17/more-women-play-video-games-than-boys-and-other-surprising-facts-lost-in-the-mess-of-gamergate/.
Hein, E. (2014). Music games in education. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Hejase, H. J., & Tabch, H. (2012). Ethics education: An assessment case of the American University of Science and Technology-Lebanon. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5, 116–133.
Hirumi, A., Appelman, B., Rieber, L., & Eck, R. V. (2010). Preparing instructional designers for game-based learning: Part 1. TechTrends, 54(3), 27–37.
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.
Joan Ganz Cooney Center. (2014). Teachers surveyed on using games in class: A games and learning research report. Retrieved from http://www.gamesandlearning.org/2014/06/09/teachers-on-using-games-in-class/.
Jollife, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611.
Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140.
Khan, M. M., & McCleary, K. W. (1996). A proposed model for teaching ethics in hospitality. Hospitality & Tourism Educator, 8(4), 7–11.
Klein, M. (2012). Enabling large-scale deliberation using attention-mediation metrics. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 21, 449–473.
Kleinman, A. (2011). The art of medicine: The divided self, hidden values, and moral sensibility in medicine. The Lancet, 377, 804–805.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kulman, R., Slobuski, T., & Seitsinger, R. (2014). Teaching 21st century, executive-functioning, and creativity skills with popular video games and apps. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Kunsch, P. L., & Brans, J. P. (2007). The practice of systems thinking in ethical and sustainable decision-making. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 15(3), 253–269.
Levitt, D. H., & Aligo, A. A. (2013). Moral orientation as a component of ethical decision making. Counseling & Values, 58, 195–204.
Lynn, C. (2010). Teaching ethics with an integrated online curriculum. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, & Tourism Education, 9(2), 123.
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. London: Allyn & Bacon.
Meng, C. L., Othman, J., D’Silva, J. L., & Omar, Z. (2014). Ethical decision making in academic dishonesty. International Education Studies, 7(3), 126.
Merriam, S. (2004). The role of cognitive development in Mezirow’s transformational learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(1), 60–68.
Montgomery, D., & Walker, M. (2012). Enhancing ethical awareness. Gifted child today, 35(2), 95–101.
Morris, L., & Wood, G. (2011). A model of organizational ethics education. European Business Review, 23(3), 274–286.
Narvaez, D., & Rest, D. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral behavior and moral development: An introduction (pp. 385–400). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Noddings, N. (1984). An ethics of care. Reprinted in M. Timmons (Ed.), (2012). Conduct & Character: Readings in moral theory (pp. 244–254). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2010). Moral education and caring. Theory and Research in Education, 8(2), 145–151.
NPD Group. (2012). Gamer segmentation report 2012. Retrieved from https://www.npd.com/latest-reports/video-gamer-segmentation-brief/.
NPD Group. (2014). 2013 Games Market Dynamics. Retrieved from https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/research-shows-15.39-billion-dollars-spent-on-video-game-content-in-the-us-in-2013-a-1-percent-increase-over-2012/.
Nussbaum, M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(345–59), 349.
Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
O’Fallon, & Butterfield, (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.
Patrick, J. J. (2003). Teaching democracy. Bloomington, IN: Educational Resources Information Center Digest (ERIC Digest).
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2009). Critical thinking: Ethical reasoning and fairminded thinking, part I. Journal of Developmental Education, 33(1), 36.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). Critical thinking: Competency standards essential to the cultivation of intellectual skills, part V. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 30.
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., Kinzer, C., Frye, J., & Perlin, K. (2011). Learning mechanics and assessment mechanics for games for learning (Games 4 Learning Institute, New York University). White Paper. Retrieved from http://steinhardtapps.es.its.nyu.edu/create/classes/2505/reading/Plass%20et%20al%20LAMechanics%202505.pdf.
Purushotma, R. (2005). Commentary: You’re not studying, you’re just . . . . Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 80–96.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
Rogerson, M., Gottlieb, M. C., Handelsman, M. M., Knapp, S., & Younggren, J. (2011). Nonrational processes in ethical decision making. American Psychologist, 66, 614–623.
Ryan, T. G., & Bisson, J. (2011). Can ethics be taught? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 44–52.
Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Saldana, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). New York: SAGE Publications.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schrier, K. (2010). Introduction. In K. Schrier & D. Gibson (Eds.), Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Schrier, K. (2011). Ethical thinking and video games: The practice of ethics in Fable III. Doctoral dissertation.
Schrier, K. (2012). Avatar gender and ethical thinking in Fable III. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32(5), 375–383.
Schrier, K. (2014a). Designing and using games to teach ethics and ethical thinking. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Schrier, K. (2014b). Ethical thinking and sustainability in Fable III. Simulation & Gaming: Sage Publications.
Schrier, K. (2014c). Designing digital games to teach history. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Schrier, K. (2014d). Introduction. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning, education and games vol. 1: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Schrier, K. (2015a). Emotion, empathy, and ethical thinking in Fable III. In S. Tettegah & W. D. Huang (Eds.), Emotions, technology, and digital games. New York: Elsevier.
Schrier, K. (2015b). EPIC: A framework for using video games in ethics education. Journal of Moral Education., 44(4), 393–424.
Schrier, K. (2016). Knowledge games: How playing games can solve problems, create insight, and make change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Schrier, K., Diamond, J., & Langendoen, D. (2010). Using Mission US: For Crown or Colony? to develop historical empathy and nurture ethical thinking. In K. Schrier & D. Gibson (Eds.), Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play. IGI Global: Hershey, PA.
Schrier, K., & Kinzer, C. (2009). Using digital games to develop ethical teachers. In D. Gibson (Ed.), Games and simulations. IGI Global: Hershey, PA.
Shafer-Landau, R. (2010). The fundamentals of ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shaffer, D. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sherman, T. M., & Kurshan, B. L. (2005). Constructing learning: Using technology to support teaching for understanding. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32, 5.
Sicart, M. (2009). Ethics and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simkins, D. (2011). Teaching ethics through gaming environments: Design, development and research perspectives. Presentation at the 2011 conference of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE). Nashville, TN: American Association for Computers in Education (AACE).
Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. New York: Teachers College Press.
Staines, D. (2010). Videogames and moral pedagogy: A Neo-Kohlbergian approach. In K. Schrier & D. Gibson (Eds.), Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play (pp. 35–51). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Steinkeuhler, C., & Simkins, D. (2008). Critical ethical reasoning and role play. Games & Culture, 3, 333–355.
Thomas, S, Schott, G., & Kambouri, M. (2003). Designing for learning or designing for fun? Setting usability guidelines for mobile educational games. In Proceedings of MLEARN 2003: Learning with Mobile Devices, London.
Tierney, N. (1994). Imagination and ethical ideals: Prospects for a unified philosophical and psychological understanding (SUNY series in ethical theory). New York: SUNY Press.
Turkay, S., Hoffman, D., Kinzer, C., Chantes, P., & Vicari, C. (2014). Toward understanding the potential of games for learning: Learning theory, game design characteristics, and situating video games in classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(1–2), 2–22.
Vacca, R., Bromley, M., Leyrer, J., Sprung, M., & Homer, B. (2014). Designing games for emotional health. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Weisstein, E. W. (2015). Fisher’s Exact Test. From MathWorld: A Wolfram Web Resource. Retrieved December 22, 2015, from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FishersExactTest.html.
Weitz, C. (2016). Minecraft with second graders. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume two: Bringing games into educational contexts. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Werner, L., Denner, J., & Campe, S. (2014). Using computer game programming to teach computational thinking skills. In K. Schrier (Ed.), Learning and education games volume one: Curricular and design considerations. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Williamson, B., & Facer, K. (2004). More than just a game: the implications for schools of children‘s computer games communities. Education, Communication, and Information, 4(2/3), 255–270.
Wines, W. A. (2008). Seven pillars of business ethics: Toward a comprehensive framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 483–499.
Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249.
Zagal, J. P. (2009). Ethically notable videogames: Moral dilemmas and gameplay. Proceedings of the 2009 Digital Games Research Association International Conference (DiGRA). London.
Zagal, J. P. (2011). Ethical reasoning and reflection as supported by single-player videogames. In K. Schrier & D. Gibson (Eds.), Designing games for ethics: Models, techniques and frameworks. Hershey: IGI Global.
Zagal, J. P. (2012). Heavy Rain: Morality in inaction, the quotidian, and the ambiguous. In K. Poels & S. Malliet (Eds.), Vice city virtue: Moral issues in digital game play. Belgium: Acco Academic.
Zgheib, P. W. (2015). Learning and teaching of ethics. In P. W. Zgheib (Ed.), Business ethics and diversity in the modern workplace (pp. 1–15). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Special thanks to David Shaenfield, Alyssa Shaenfield, Noah Shaenfield, Charles Kinzer, Sandra Okita, and Joey Lee, as well as to the reviewers of this manuscript.
Appendix 1: Sample journal entry (game condition)
This journal will cover:
From the very beginning of the game until you reach the beginning of the quest named “The Bowerstone Resistance.” NOTE: This is the point in the game when you first get to Bowerstone Industrial, right after you killed Lieutenant Simmons, and first meet Page, the leader of the Bowerstone Resistance. It is when you first need to earn 100 guild points.
If you just do the Main Quest part, this journal will cover about 3 ½ hours of game play, so you may want to take notes as you go along. You do not need to complete this whole part in one sitting. You can take as long as you want to reach each point, and do not have to do it in one sitting. Just fill out a journal after you reach the end of the portion of the game. You only need to complete the Main Quest story line (top quest in the list of quests), but you can
do any other side quests too.
Fill out these questions and send it to XXXXXXX@gmail.com.
Your ID Number (given in the instructions email): ______________________________
(optional) Date/time of day played the game: ________________________
(optional) Approximate length of time playing the game: ______hours________minutes
What are the quests or activities you participated in today? (If you do not know the name, just describe the goal(s) or choice(s) involved.)
Name one, two or three ethical decisions you made as part of the quests or activities. Use your judgment as to what was an ethical decision. Explain why you think these were ethical decisions.
Choose one of the ethical decisions you had to make. Be as detailed as possible. Describe the options you had, the setting and people that were involved, the context, dialogue, situation, and what types of action or behaviors you chose.
Why did you make this decision? What aspects of the game or game play (characters, scenarios, art, dialogue, points, mission, etc.) helped you make those decisions? Was there anything outside of the game you used to help you make a decision (e.g., other people, other resources)? What did you think about? How did you feel? Be as detailed as possible in describing how you made the decision.
If you were going to walk through this scenario with another person, who hasn’t played the game yet, what would you tell him/her? What strategies and tips would you share with him/her?
On a scale from 1 to 10(most satisfied), how satisfied are you with your decision? Optional questions:
Did you think about this decision later, after you already made the decision and acted?
Did you take into account other character’s feelings when making your decision? What about other character’s motivations? What about other character’s perspectives? If so, how did you use this in your decision-making process?
Did you gather any information when making your decision? If so, what did you use? What else would you have liked to know?
Did you discuss the decision with others (other characters or other people) before making it? If so, who? Did you ask questions?
Did you think about the consequences of your decision before you made it? Were you surprised by the consequences when you did experience them?
Did you think about any prior experiences to make your decision? If so, how did they factor in?
Appendix 2: Sample control scenario
Imagine you are living in a time of wizards and dragons, princesses and princes, castles and moats, set in the Middle Ages in an imaginary European city. You are the prince or princess of the land called Albion. You are living in a castle in a kingdom. Your parents have been killed, and your older brother, Logan, is the ruler of the land. You have never gotten along with your brother, and you start to notice some suspicious activity. One day, Logan has the guards capture you. He also has captured your very close friend—a childhood friend whom you have grown up with.
Logan visits you and your childhood friend in captivity. He tells you that he has a few of the Albion townspeople held in a dungeon. Logan says he will release the townspeople if you trade your friend for the townspeople, but he won’t let you sacrifice yourself. What do you do?
Appendix 3: Chart of example ethical decisions made in Fable III
|Name of scenario||Choices in scenario||Associated journal|
|“Surrender a Friend”||
a. Sacrifice friend|
b. Sacrifice villagers
a. Save walter|
b. Leave walter behind
a. Spare brother logan|
b. Kill brother logan
|“Donate the diamond”||
a. Donate a diamond|
b. Keep a diamond
|“Tax the Parents”||
a. Give benefits to parents|
b. Stay the same
c. Raise taxes for parents
|“Mine the lake”||
a. Drain a lake for money|
b. Preserve the lake
Appendix 4: Chart of skills and thought processes (coding scheme)
|Consider another’s character or values||Empathy-related (also arguably reasoning-related)|
|Consider someone’s motivation||Empathy-related|
|Perspective-taking/consider someone’s perspective||Empathy-related|
|Consider another’s emotions/feelings||Empathy-related|
|Consider/assess relationship with another character/person||Empathy-related|
|Consider other’s opinions||Empathy-related|
|Search for other’s opinions||Information gathering-related|
|Gather information not included in scenario||Information gathering-related|
|Choices depend on new information||Information gathering-related|
|Discuss with real people||Information gathering-related|
|Discuss with other characters||Information gathering-related|
|Use evidence to support choices||Reasoning-related|
|Provide reasons for a decision||Reasoning-related|
|Weigh different options||Reasoning-related|
|Evaluate social standing or status||Reasoning-related|
|Evaluate agreement or promise||Reasoning-related|
|Consider one’s role or responsibility||Reasoning-related|
|Consider longer-term effects||Reasoning-related|
|Consider short-term effects||Reasoning-related|
|Identify pros and cons||Reasoning-related|
|Analysis of situation or context||Reasoning-related|
|Prioritizing goals or factors||Reasoning-related|
|Military resource assessment||Reasoning-related|
|Consider own emotions||Empathy-related|
|Consider past events in game/play experience||Reflection-related|
|Consider past events outside game||Reflection-related|
|Consider media (TV, film) outside of game||Reflection-related|
|Reflect after decision||Reflection-related|
|Conduct cost-benefit analysis||Reasoning-related|
|Search for/seek more information||Information gathering-related|
|Prioritization of other’s perspectives when making a decision||Empathy-related|
|Prioritization of one’s personal ethics/morality when making a decision||Reasoning-related; empathy-related|
|Prioritization of individual or self-interests||Reasoning-related|
|Prioritization of safety and people’s lives over all other factors||Empathy-related|
|Prioritization of financial/resource gain when making a decision||Reasoning-related|
|Prioritization of greater good over individual interests||Reasoning-related|
|Prioritization of feelings or emotions to help make decisions||Empathy-related|
|Prioritization of relationships to help make decisions||Empathy-related|
|Prioritization of agreements or promises to help make decisions||Reasoning-related|
|Prioritization of one’s roles and responsibilities in making a decision||Reasoning-related|
|Decision based on number of lives harmed||Reasoning-related|
|Decision based on the evaluation of future value of a person or people as a resource||Reasoning-related|
|Evaluation of long term results over short term results||Reasoning-related|
|Assessment of past experiences within the game, and use it to predict the future||Reflection-related|
|Analysis of prior choices to justify current choice||Reflection-related|
|Prioritization of someone else’s feelings to make a decision||Empathy-related|
|Will not make a decision without first gathering information to predict future outcomes||Information gathering-related|
|Imagining what if scenarios and possible consequences to justify decision||Reasoning-related|
|Liking a character/person as a reason for doing something||Empathy-related|
|Judgment that someone is a friend/romantic partner influences decision||Empathy-related|
|Problem solve from another’s perspective and use it to make one’s decision||Empathy-related|
About this article
Cite this article
Schrier, K. Designing role-playing video games for ethical thinking. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 831–868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9489-7
- Digital games