Ackermann, E. K. (2004). Constructing knowledge and transforming the world. In M. Tokoro & L. Steels (Eds.), A learning zone of one’s own: Sharing representations and flow in collaborative learning environments
. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Ackermann, E. K. (2007). Experience of artifacts: People’s appropriations/object’s affordances. In M. Larochelle (Ed.), Ernst von Glasersfeld, Key works on radical constructivism
. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Adachi, T., Goseki, M., Muratsu, K., Mizoguchi, H., Namatame, M., & Sugimoto, M. (2013). Human SUGOROKU: Full-body interaction system for students to learn vegetation succession. In Proceeding of the 2013 conference on interaction design and children—IDC’13 (pp. 364–367).
Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., & Baber, C. (2011). An evaluation of multimodal interactions with technology while learning science concepts. British Journal of Educational Technology,
(2), 266–290. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01017.x
Antle, A. N. (2013). Research opportunities: Embodied child–computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction,
(1), 30–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.001
Antle, A. N., Corness, G., & Bevans, A. (2013). Balancing justice: Comparing whole body and controller-based interaction for an abstract domain. Internation Journal of Arts and Technology,
(4), 1–21.Google Scholar
Antle, A. N., Droumeva, M., & Corness, G. (2008). Playing with the sound maker: Do embodied metaphors help children learn? In Proceeding of the 2008 international conference on interaction design and children—IDC’08 (pp. 178–185).
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology,
, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C., & Smith, P. (1994). Assessing students’ abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: Disparities between multiple-choice and free response instruments. Science Education,
(6), 527–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand
. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carreras, A., & Parés, N. (2004). Designing an interactive installation for children to experience abstract concepts. In New trends on human–computer interaction (pp. 33–42).
Charoenying, T., Gaysinsky, A., & Ryokai, K. (2012). The choreography of conceptual development in computer supported instructional environments. In Proceeding of the 2012 international conference on interaction design and children—IDC’13 (Vol. 4, pp. 162–167).
Clearfield, M. W. (2004). The role of crawling and walking experience in infant spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
(3), 214–241. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.07.003
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology,
(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2007). Fictional inquiry—Design collaboration in a shared narrative space. CoDesign,
(4), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druin, A. (2002). The Role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology,
(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1975). Trattato di semiotica generale
. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Edge, D., Cheng, K., & Whitney, M. (2013). SpatialEase: Learning language through body motion (c). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’13) (pp. 469–472).
Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., Delacruz, G., & Kumar, M. (2012). Learning physics through play in an augmented reality environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,
(3), 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, D. E. (1993). Engineering knowledge: The construction of knowledge in artificial intelligence. Social Studies of Science, 23
(3), 445–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,
(4), 586–596. doi:10.1002/wcs.55
Glenberg, A. M., Brown, M., & Levin, J. R. (2007). Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
(3), 389–399. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.03.001
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Learning through gesture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,
(6), 595–607.Google Scholar
Grønbæk, K., Iversen, O. S., Kortbek, K. J., Nielsen, K. R., & Aagaard, L. (2007). Interactive floor support for kinesthetic interaction in children learning environments. In INTERACT 2007 (pp. 361–375).
Hanna, L., Risden, K., & Alexander, K. (1997). Guidelines for usability testing with children. Interactions,
(5), 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S., Sengers, P., & Tatar, D. (2011). Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers,
(5), 385–392. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005
Iversen, O. S., & Dindler, C. (2013). A Utopian agenda in child–computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1
(1), 24–29. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.002
Iverson, J. M. (2010). Developing language in a developing body: The relationship between motor development and language development. Journal of Child Language,
(2), 1–25. doi:10.1017/S0305000909990432.Developing
Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In S. Price & C. Jewitt (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital technology research
(pp. 250–265). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D., & Megowan-romanowicz, C. (2010). Semi-virtual embodied learning-real world stem assessment. In L. Annetta & S. Bronack (Eds.), Serious educational game assessment: Practical methods and models for educational games, simulations and virtual worlds
(pp. 225–241). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.Google Scholar
Johnson-glenberg, M. C., Koziupa, T., & Birchfield, D. (2011a). Games for learning in embodied mixed-reality environments: Principles and results (pp. 129–137).
Johnson-glenberg, M. C., Koziupa, T., & Birchfield, D. (2011b). Games for learning in embodied mixed-reality environments: Principles and results. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Games + Learning + Society Conference (GLS’11) (pp. 129–137).
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,
(1), 61–79. doi:10.1007/BF02299477
Kim, M. J., & Maher, M. L. (2008). The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design. Design Studies,
(3), 222–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Charalampos, M. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new direction. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (p. 216).
Kontra, C., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Embodied learning across the life span. Topics in Cognitive Science,
(4), 731–739. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01221.x
Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development,
(2), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication
. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kynigos, C., Smyrnaiou, Z., & Roussou, M. (2010). Exploring rules and underlying concepts while engaged with collaborative full-body games. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on interaction design and children
(p. 222). New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1810543.1810576
Lucht, M., & Steffi, H. (2013). Applying HOPSCOTCH as an exer-learning game in english lessons: Two exploratory studies. Educational Technology Research and Development,
767–792. Retrieved from http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/736/art%253A10.1007%252Fs11423-013-9308-3.pdf?auth66=1385030919_d2e250cf1098acb01a5d6addac9dffca&ext=.pdf
Lucignano, L., Cuendet, S., Schwendimann, B. A., Shirvani Boroujeni, M., Dehler, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). My hands or my mouse: Comparing a tangible and graphical user interface using eye-tracking data. In Fablearn 2014 (No. EPFL-CONF-204226).
Malinverni, L., Lopez Silva, B., & Pares, N. (2012). Impact of embodied interaction on learning processes: Design and analysis of an educational application based on physical activity. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children (IDC’12) (pp. 60–69).
Malinverni, L., & Pares, N. (2014). Learning of abstract concepts through full-body interaction: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society,
(4), 100–116.Google Scholar
Malinverni, L., & Pares, N. (2015). The medium matters: The impact of full-body interaction on the socio-affective aspects of collaboration. In IDC’15 Proceedings of the 2015 conference on interaction design and children
. ACM. doi:10.1145/2771839.2771849
Markopoulos, P., Read, J., MacFarlane, S., & Höysniemi, J. (2008). Evaluating children’s interactive products
. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Muller, M. J., & Druin, A. (2003). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In Human–computer interaction: Development process (Vol. 4235, pp. 1–70).
Nathan, M., & Robinson, C. (2001). Considerations of learning and learning research: Revisiting the “media effects” debate. Journal of Interactive Learning Research,
(1), 69–88.Google Scholar
Nesset, V., & Large, A. (2004). Children in the information technology design process: A review of theories and their applications. Library & Information Science Research,
(2), 140–161. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2003.12.002
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education,
(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, Inc.
Overton, W. F. (2004). Embodied development: Ending the nativsim-empiricism debate. In C. Garcia Coll, E. Bearer, & R. Lerner (Eds.), Nature and nurture: The complex interplay of genetic and environmental influences on human behavior and development (pp. 201–223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas
. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
Price, S., & Jewitt, C. (2013). A multimodal approach to examining “embodiment” in tangible learning environments. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (TEI’13) (pp. 43–50).
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,
(2), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, T., & Okey, J. (1996). Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments. Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 191–202).
Revelle, G. (2013). Applying developmental theory and research to the creation of educational games. In Digital games: A context for cognitive development. New directions for child and adolescent development
(pp. 31–40). doi:10.1002/cad
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paolo, E. A. Di, Rohde, M., & Jaegher, H. De. (2007). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social. Horizons (April).
Schaper, M., Malinverni, L., & Pares, N. (2014). Participatory design methods to define educational goals for full-body interaction. In Proceedings of the 11th conference on advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE’14)
(p. 4). ACM. doi:10.1145/2663806.2663867
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. In Embodied interaction (pp. 1–26).
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,
(4), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
(4), 625–36. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12613670
Zuckerman, O., & Resnick, M. (2003). A physical interface for system dynamics simulation. In CHI’03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems
(pp. 810–811). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/765891.766005