Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of redundancy and modality on the situational interest of adult learners in multimedia learning

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of two design principles as prescribed by the cognitive theory of multimedia learning on the situational interest of adult learners in a multimedia-based continuing education training program. One hundred and two adult learners employed by an emergency medical service were randomly assigned to one of three training groups designed to follow modality and redundancy design principles: animation-text, animation-narration, and animation-narration-text. A pretest was administered to participants in segments and presented to participants intermittently during the content in an attempt to reduce unintentional negative effects on interest, and a posttest was administered after participants submitted the self-reporting survey intended to measure situational interest in a multimedia-learning environment. An ANOVA was used to analyze the differences in situational interest between the groups, and independent t-tests were used to evaluate differences. The results of the study indicated that combinations of animation, narration, and text do influence the situational interest of learners. These results highlight the importance of carefully considering how to design multimedia environments for maximum impact on learners and specifically the implications of violating the redundancy design principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 82–103. doi:10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x

  • Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391–405. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0

  • Aldalalah, O. M. A. A., & Fong, S. F. (2010). Effects of modality and redundancy principles on the learning and attitude of a computer-based music theory lesson among Jordanian primary pupils. International Education Studies, 3(3), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alghowinem, S., AlShehri, M., Goecke, R., & Wagner, M. (2014). Exploring eye activity as an indication of emotional states using an eye-tracking sensor. In L. Chen, S. Kapoor, & R. Bhatia (Eds.), Intelligent systems for science and information (Vol. 542, pp. 261–276). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04702-7

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorenson, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2014.11

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<107::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X

  • Clark, R. E., & Feldon, D. F. (2005). Five common but questionable principles of multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 97–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). e-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 39–80). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M. S., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez, O. C. (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(7), 94–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Riverside.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, A. J., Horst, S. J., Finney, S. J., & Barron, K. E. (2005). Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the Academic Motivation Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harskamp, E. G., Mayer, R. E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms? Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 465–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215–238). Hilldale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness–a neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, J. T., & Westfall, P. J. (2010). Developing a blended learning strategy: An instructional media perspective. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems 24(1), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383–434). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1987). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction, 26(10), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (2010a). Challenges in learner motivation: A holistic, integrative model for research and design on learner motivation. In The 11th International Conference on Education Research.

  • Keller, J. M. (2010b). Motivational design for learning and performance. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3

  • Keller, J. M. (2016). Motivation, learning, and technology: Applying the ARCS-V motivation model. Participatory Educational Research, 3(2), 1–15. doi:10.17275/per.16.06.3.2

  • Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.004

  • Koeber, C. (2005). Introducing multimedia presentations and a course website to an introductory sociology course: How technology affects student perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Teaching Sociology, 33(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2002). An educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), The handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405–427). Rochester: Rochester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, L. L., & Gall, J. E. (2007). Representation Strategies. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 85–96). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, D. L., Evans, A. D., Jeffrey, T. R., Palmer, K. R., Wikstrom, C. S., & Doolittle, P. E. (2009). Multimedia learning and individual differences: Mediating the effects of working memory capacity with segmentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 636–651. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00848.x

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005b). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mayer, R. E. (2014). Multimedia instruction. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 385–399). New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Estrella, G. (2014). Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction, 33, 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.004

  • Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T. N., & Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 329–339.

  • Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 380–386. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.380

  • Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2008). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833–841. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.833

  • Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002a). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002b). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, A. L., Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. (2009). The effects of training, modality, and redundancy on the development of a historical inquiry strategy in a multimedia learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 8(3), 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. (2011). Designing effective instruction (6th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowaczyk, R. H., Santos, L. T., & Patton, C. (1998). Student perception of multimedia in the undergraduate classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(4), 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathunde, K. (1993). The experience of interest: A theoretical and empirical look at its role in adolescent talent development. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (8th ed., Vol. 8, pp. 59–98). Stamford: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In J. M. Harackiewicz & C. Sansone (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373–404). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 58–69. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.999920

  • Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37–50. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.002

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Stiller, J. (1991). The social contexts of internalization: Parent and teacher influences on autonomy, motivation and learning. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 115–149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 299–323. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5

  • Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning (pp. 49–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Bruning, R., & Svoboda, C. (1995). Sources of situational interest. Journal of Literacy Research, 27(1), 1–17.

  • Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211–225.

  • Schunk, D. H. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 463–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Columbus: Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (2006). The importance of motivation, metacognition, and help seeking in web-based learning. In H. F. O’Neil Jr. & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Web-based learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 203–220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.  

  • van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., & Andre, T. (1991). Conceptual change text versus traditional text and application questions versus no questions in learning about electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16(2), 103–116. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(91)90031-F

  • Wekesa, E., Kiboss, J., & Ndirangu, M. (2006). Improving students’ understanding and perception of cell theory in school biology using a computer-based instruction simulation program. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(4), 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. (1979). The cognitive movement in instruction. Educational Researcher, 8(2), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaverbaum, G., Kulkarni, M., & Wood, C. (1997). Multimedia projection: An exploratory study of student perceptions regarding interest, organization, and clarity. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(2), 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. H., Jannasch-Pennell, A., & DiGangi, S. (2008). A non-technical approach for illustrating item response theory. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 9(2), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. H., Jannasch-Pennell, A., DiGangi, S., & Kaprolet, C. (2009). An exploratory crossover study of learner perceptions of use of audio in multimedia-based tutorials. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 23–46. doi:10.2190/EC.40.1.b

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Dept. 3374, Laramie, WY, 82070, USA

    Tonia A. Dousay

Authors
  1. Tonia A. Dousay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tonia A. Dousay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dousay, T.A. Effects of redundancy and modality on the situational interest of adult learners in multimedia learning. Education Tech Research Dev 64, 1251–1271 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9456-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9456-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation