Digital devices and teaching the whole student: developing and validating an instrument to measure educators’ attitudes and beliefs
Even as digital devices (e.g., tablets, smart phones, laptops) have become increasingly ubiquitous in schools, concerns have also been raised that such devices might hinder students’ social, emotional, and personal development. Educators’ perspectives on such matters could shape the success or failure of 1:1 technology initiatives. Thus, there is a need for a way to measure educators’ attitudes and beliefs toward the potential impact of digital devices on educating the whole student. This paper describes the development of the Digital Devices and Educating the Whole Student instrument and the results from a pilot study of 59 educators. The results suggested three potential domains of teacher attitudes toward the impact of devices on students; holistic learning outcomes, classroom learning processes, and concerns about digital distraction. Overall, the survey instrument demonstrated reliability and validity suggesting that the survey instrument may be a useful tool for school technology researchers and practitioners alike.
KeywordsWhole student One-to-one Instrument development Teacher beliefs
- Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantative results from the berkshire wireless learning initative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 5–59.Google Scholar
- Bebell, D., & O’Dwyer, L. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(1). Retrieved http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1606.
- Brooks, C. (2011). Locating leadership: The blind spot in Alberta’s technology policy discourse. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 19(26). Retrieved http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/910.
- Cho, V., & Wayman, J. C. (2014). Districts’ efforts for data use and computer data systems: The role of sensemaking in system use and implementation. Teachers College Record, 116(2), 1–45.Google Scholar
- Cho, V., & Wayman, J. C. (2015). Assumptions, strategies, and organization: Central office implementation of computer data systems. Journal of School Leadership, 25(6), 1203–1236.Google Scholar
- Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Mason: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M., & Kelly, D. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 92(6), 1087–1101.Google Scholar
- Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Hardy, J. V. (2014). Teacher attitudes toward and knowledge of computer technolgoy. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 13(3–4), 119–136.Google Scholar
- Homana, G., & Barber, C. (2006). Assessing school citizenship education climate: Implications for the social studies. College Park, MD: CIRCLE Working Paper 48.Google Scholar
- Hotelling, H. (1951). A generalized T test and measure of multivariate dispersion. Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Berkely, CA: The Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
- Hughes, J. E., Guion, J. M., Bruce, K. A., Horton, L. R., & Prescott, A. (2011). A framework for action: Intervening to increase adoption of transformative Web 2.0 learning resources. Educational Technology, 51(2), 53–61.Google Scholar
- Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., & Watkins, S. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.Google Scholar
- Johnson, L. (2007). Rethinking successful school leadership in challenging U.S. schools: Culturally responsive practices in school-community relationships. International Studies in International Education, 35(3), 49–57.Google Scholar
- Nagel, D. (2010). Computing programs on the rise with netbooks leading adoption. The Journal. Retrieved http://thejournal.com/articles/2010/10/19/1-to-1-computing-programs-on-the-rise-with-netbooks-leading-adoption.aspx.
- Pagani, L., Fitzpatrick, C., Barnett, T., & Dubow, E. (2010). Prospective associations between early childhood television exposure and academic, psychological, and physical well-being by middle childhood. Archives of pediatric and adolescent medicine, 164(5), 425–431. doi:10.001/archpediatrics.2010.50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pellegrino, J., & Hilton, M. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Research Council, Center for Education; Divison on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Richardson, J., McLeod, S., Flora, K., Sauers, N., Kannan, S., & Sincar, M. (2013). Large scale 1:1 computing initiatives: An open access database. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 418.Google Scholar
- Sauers, N., & Kruse, J. (2012). Do pocket-assisted technologies, such as the iPod and iPhone and iPad, provide mainly educational benefits or distractions to students in today’s schools. In C. J. Russo & A. Osborne (Eds.), Debating issues in American education (Vol. 10). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sauers, N., & McLeod, S. (2012). What does research day about school one-to-one computing initatives. Lexington, KY: UCEA Center for the Advanced Study of Technology Leadership in Education.Google Scholar
- Seider, S. (2012). Character compass: How powerful school culture can point students toward success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. New York: Houghton Miffin Company.Google Scholar
- Shuler, C. (2009). Pockets of potential: Using mobile technologies to promote children’s learning. New York: The Joan Ganz Conner Center.Google Scholar
- Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (2009). Tinkering toward Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Vannatta, R., & Banister, S. (2009). Validating a measure of teacher technology integration. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1134–1140). Charleston, SC: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.Google Scholar
- Wallis, C. (2010). The impacts of media multitasking on children’s learning and development: Report from a research seminar. New York: The Joan Ganz Conney Center.Google Scholar