Skip to main content

Science Spots AR: a platform for science learning games with augmented reality

Abstract

Lack of motivation and of real-world relevance have been identified as reasons for low interest in science among children. Game-based learning and storytelling are prominent methods for generating intrinsic motivation in learning. Real-world relevance requires connecting abstract scientific concepts with the real world. This can be done by situating learning processes in real-world contexts, and by bridging the virtual content and the real world with augmented reality (AR). We combined these ideas into a Science Spots AR platform on which context-aware storytelling science learning games can be created. As proof-of-concept we developed and evaluated Leometry game, which contains geometry problems based on the Van Hiele model. This paper’s contributions are as follows: (1) concept and architecture of Science Spots AR, (2) design and implementation of the Leometry game prototype, and (3) mixed-method formative evaluation of Leometry with 61 Korean 5th grade elementary school children. Data retrieved by questionnaires and interviews revealed that the students appreciated Leometry despite its minor shortcomings, that the platform’s concept is feasible, and that there is potential for building science learning games. These results are useful to educators, computer scientists, and game designers who are interested in combining context-aware learning, AR, and games.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Notes

  1. http://www.vuforia.com.

References

  • Abadzi, H. (2006). Efficient learning for the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-6688-2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alterio, M. (2003). Learning through storytelling in higher education: using reflection & experience to improve learning. London: Kogan Page. doi:10.4324/9780203416655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balog, A., & Pribeanu, C. (2010). The role of perceived Enjoyment in the students acceptance of an augmented reality teaching platform: A structural equation modeling approach. Studies in Informatics and Control, 19(3), 319–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-C. (2006). A study of comparing the use of augmented reality and physical models in chemistry education. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications—VRCIA’06 (pp. 369–372). New York: ACM Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dionisio Correa, A. G., Tahira, A., Ribeir, J. B., Kitamura, R. K., Inoue, T. Y., & Karaguilla Ficheman, I. (2013). Development of an interactive book with Augmented Reality for mobile learning. In Proceedings of the Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (pp. 1–7). Lisboa, Portugal.

  • Dirin, A., & Nieminen, M. (2013). State-of-the-art m-learning usability and user experience. In The fourth international conference on e-learning (pp. 130–139). Czech Republic.

  • Dormann, C., & Biddle, R. (2006). Humour in game-based learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(4), 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735–745). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duveskog, M. (2015). Digital storytelling for HIV and AIDS education in Africa. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M., Lazarus, A., Calvano, T., Matthews, K., Hendel, R., Epstein, B., & Brosvic, G. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52(2), 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K., Joiner, R., Stanton, D., Reid, J., Hull, R., & Kirk, D. (2004). Savannah: mobile gaming and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 20(1980), 399–409. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00105.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science education policy-making: Eleven emerging issues (UNESCO). Retrieved from http://goo.gl/0erjiV.

  • Flagg, B. N. (1990). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortus, D., & Vedder-Weiss, D. (2014). Measuring students’ continuing motivation for science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 497–522. doi:10.1002/tea.21136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: how stories make us human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heumer, G., Gommlich, F., Jung, B., & Mueller, A. (2007). Via Mineralia—A pervasive museum exploration game. In Proceedings of PerGames 2007 (pp. 159–160). Salzburg, Austria.

  • Hmelo-silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, D.C: The National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2012). a project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, Y. L., Wu, T. T., Huang, Y. M., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. J. H. (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68(1), 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2007). Environmental detectives—The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laine, T. H. (2012). Technology integration in context-aware learning spaces. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, T. H., Islas Sedano, C., Sutinen, E., & Joy, M. (2010). Viable and portable architecture for pervasive learning spaces. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia. Limassol, Cyprus.

  • Lehmann, S. E. (2013). TaleBlazer: Implementing a multiplayer server for location-based augmented reality games. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J., Spires, H., Nietfeld, J., Minogue, J., Mott, B., & Lobene, E. (2014). Designing game-based learning environments for elementary science education: A narrative-centered learning perspective. Information Sciences, 264, 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Rosenblum, J. A., Horton, L., & Kang, L. (2014). Designing science learning with game-based approaches. Computers in the Schools, 31(1–2), 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T.-Y., Tan, T.-H., & Chu, Y.-L. (2009). Outdoor natural science learning with an RFID-supported immersive ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lordly, D. (2007). Once upon a time… storytelling to enhance teaching and learning. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research, 68(1), 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, 3, 223–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Dikkers, S., Squire, K., & Gagnon, D. (2014). Participatory scaling through augmented reality learning through local games. TechTrends, 58(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM, 33(3), 338–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., Goldenberg, S., Agarwal, K., Chakravorty, T., Cutrell, J., Doris-Down, A., et al. (2012). Story-map: iPad companion for long form TV narratives. In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on interactive TV and video (pp. 223–226).

  • Nygren, E., Sutinen, E., Blignaut, A. S., Laine, T. H., & Els, C. J. (2012). Motivations for play in the UFractions mobile game in three countries. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(2), 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Sanagustin, M., Hernandez-Leo, D., Santos, P., Delgado Kloos, C., & Blat, J. (2014). Augmenting reality and formality of informal and non-formal settings to enhance blended learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(2), 118–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C., & Parvin, J. (2008). Learning to Love Science: Harnessing children’s scientific imagination. York: The Chemical Industry Education Centre, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, M. (1974). Play as exploratory learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 220–228. doi:10.1080/00405840802153916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., et al. (2004). Ambient wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. In Proceedings of the third international conference for interaction design and children (pp. 3–10). College Park, MD, USA.

  • Rossiter, M. (2002). Narrative and stories in adult teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, 2002(241), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiele, P. (1984). In D. J. Fuys, D. Geddes, & R. Tischler (Eds.), English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M van Hiele. Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlin, J., & Laine, T. H. (2014a). Calory battle AR: An extensible mobile augmented reality platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (pp. 171–172). Seoul: IEEE.

  • Westlin, J., & Laine, T. H. (2014b). ManySense: An extensible and accessible middleware for consumer-oriented heterogeneous body sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2014, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. B., & Ma, H. (2006). The distributions of van hiele levels of geometric thinking among 1st through 6th graders. In Proceedings of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 409–416). Prague, Czech Republic.

  • Yusoff, R. C. M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2011). Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1369–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., Williams, B., Bryant, J., Boynton, K., & Wolf, M. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Renny Lindberg, Daehwan Kim, Nina Hytönen and Jaemu Lee for their contributions to Leometry. Yuna Oh and the children participating in the Leometry evaluation also deserve our gratitude. This work was supported by the Korean National Research Foundation project NRF-2015R1C1A1A02036469.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae-Jung Suk.

Ethics declarations

Research involves children as participants. Before running the experiment with the children, we acquired data collection and media usage permissions from their guardians. Furthermore, children’s personal data such as names were not collected.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laine, T.H., Nygren, E., Dirin, A. et al. Science Spots AR: a platform for science learning games with augmented reality. Education Tech Research Dev 64, 507–531 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9419-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9419-0

Keywords

  • Context-aware
  • Augmented reality
  • Games
  • Science learning
  • Storytelling