Online discussions offer exciting potential for educational dialogue, but too often result in disjointed conversations with low levels of interactivity. One contributing cause is the traditional text-based interface, which presents posts in a long list, leaving students overwhelmed and without useful navigational cues. To address this problem, we used information visualization techniques to design a graphical discussion forum interface. Starburst presents discussion posts as a dynamic hyperbolic tree: higher-level posts initially appear as larger and more central nodes, with each level of replies appearing smaller and more towards the periphery. To evaluate the new interface, students’ discussion participation using Starburst was compared to their activity interacting with the same discussion content in a traditional text-based linear forum. Results showed that students were more purposeful in selecting which discussion threads to read when using Starburst and read new posts in a more connected fashion. Implications for the future design, use, and research of online discussions are considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Posts that are made with no reference to previous posts constitute new root nodes.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1–23.
Boulos, M. N., & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 2–23.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
Carr-Chellman, A., & Duchastel, P. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 229–241.
Caswell, B., & Bielaczyc, K. (2002). Knowledge Forum: Altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge. Education, Communication & Information, 1, 281–305.
Chan, C. K., & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers & Education, 57, 1445–1457.
Chan, J. C. C., Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2009). Asynchronous online discussion thread development: Examining growth patterns and peer-facilitation techniques. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 25, 438–452.
Cui, Y., & Wise, A. F. (2015). Identifying content-related threads in MOOC discussion forums. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 299–303). Vancouver, BC: ACM.
Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–34.
Dringus, L. P., & Ellis, T. (2005). Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums. Computers & Education, 45, 141–160.
Engdahl, B., Köksal, M., & Marsden, G. (2005). Using treemaps to visualize threaded discussion forums on PDAs. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1355–1358).
Forde, C. (2008). A virtual margin for knowledge work on the web: Design, implementation and usability testing, Unpublished masters thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 5–9.
Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction, 18, 187–200.
Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115–152.
Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x.
Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 31–45.
Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 567–589.
Hillman, D., Willis, D., & Gunawardena, C. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.
Hsiao, Y. T., Wise, A. F., & Marbouti, F. (2012). The impact of task type on learners’ online interaction patterns. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
Johnson, B., & Shneiderman, B. (1991). Tree-maps: A space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. Proceedings of IEEE Information Visualization, 284–291.
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 61–79.
Kear, K. (2001). Following the thread in computer conferences. Computers & Education, 37, 81–99.
Kim, B., & Johnson, Ph. (2006). Graphical interface for visual exploration of online discussion forums. The Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 4(4), 43–47.
Lamping, J., & Rao R. (1994). Laying out and visualization large trees using a hyperbolic space. Proceedings of the 7th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 13–14.
Lamping, J., & Rao, R. (1996). The hyperbolic browser: A focus + context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7, 33–55.
Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., & Moreira, A. (2014). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 574–582.
Marbouti, F. (2012). Design, implementation and testing of a visual discussion forum to address new post bias, Unpublished master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Guerrilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. In R. G. Bias & D. J. Mayhew (Eds.), Cost-justifying usability (pp. 245–272). Boston, MA: Academic Press.
Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 847–858.
Peters, V. L., & Hewitt, J. (2010). An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers & Education, 54, 951–961.
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network, 6(1), 21–40.
Pickett, R. M., Grinstein, G. G., Levkowitz, H., & Smith, S. (1995). Harnessing pre-attentive perceptual processes in visualization. In G. Grinstein & H. Levkowitz (Eds.), Perceptual issues in visualization (pp. 33–45). New York, NY: Springer.
Plaisant, C., Grosjean, J., & Bederson, B. B. (2002). Space tree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. Proceedings of IEEE Information Visualization, 57–64.
Quinlan, P., & Humphreys, G. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape and size: An examination of task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 455–472.
Robertson, G. G., Mackinlay, J. D., & Card, S. K. (1993). Information visualization using 3D interactive animation. Communications of the ACM, 36(4), 57–71.
Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum. Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183–192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Smith, M. A., & Fiore, A. T. (2001). Visualization components for persistent conversations. Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2001 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, 136–143.
Spence, R. (2007). Information visualization: Design for interaction. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing. In P. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education (pp. 53–85). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 21(2), 79–90.
Suthers, D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2008). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computer & Education, 50, 1103–1127.
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education, practice and direction (pp. 13–45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
Teplovs, C. (2008). The Knowledge Space Visualizer: A tool for visualizing online discourse. Paper presented at the Common Framework for CSCL Interaction Analysis Workshop at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2008. Utrecht, NL.
Teplovs, C., Donoahue, Z., Scardamalia, M., & Philip, D. (2007). Tools for concurrent, embedded, and transformative assessment of knowledge building processes and progress. Demonstration presented at Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference 2007. New Brunswick, NJ.
Teplovs, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2007). Visualizations for knowledge building assessment. Paper presented at the AgileViz workshop, Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference 2007. New Brunswick, NJ.
Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 18, 351–366.
Wanstreet, C. E. (2009). Interaction in online learning environments. In A. Orellana, T. L. Hudgins, & M. R. Simonson (Eds.), The perfect online course: Best practices for designing and teaching (pp. 425–442). USA: Information Age Publishing.
Ware, C. (2004). Information visualization: Perception for design. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufman.
Wegerif, R., McLaren, B. M., Chamrada, M., Scheuer, O., Mansour, N., Mikšátko, J., & Williams, M. (2010). Exploring creative thinking in graphically mediated synchronous dialogues. Computers & Education, 54, 613–621.
Wise, A. F., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & Del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271.
Wise, A. F., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 445–470.
Wise, A. F., Hausknecht, S. N., & Zhao, Y. (2014a). Attending to others’ posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners’ online “listening” and its relationship to speaking. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(2), 185–209.
Wise, A. F., Hsiao, Y. T., Speer, J., Marbouti, F., & Perera, N. (2012a). Initial validation of “listening” behavior typologies for online discussions using microanalytic case studies. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. Jacobson & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2012 (pp. 56–63). Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
Wise, A. F., Marbouti, F., Hsiao, Y., & Hausknecht, S. (2012b). A survey of factors contributing to learners’ “listening” behaviors in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(4), 461–480.
Wise, A. F., & Padmanabhan, P. (2009). Seeing the forest and the trees: Visualizing the structural and temporal dimensions of asynchronous threaded online learning conversations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association. San Diego, CA.
Wise, A. F., Perera, N., Hsiao, Y., Speer, J., & Marbouti, F. (2012c). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 108–117.
Wise. A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F., & Hsiao, Y. T. (2013). Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors. Instructional Science, 41(2), 323–343.
Wise, A. F., Zhao, Y., & Hausknecht, S. N. (2014b). Learning analytics for online discussions: Embedded and extracted approaches. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 48–71.
Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D. & Rose, C. P. (2013). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In Workshop on Data Driven Education, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2013.
This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
About this article
Cite this article
Marbouti, F., Wise, A.F. Starburst: a new graphical interface to support purposeful attention to others’ posts in online discussions. Education Tech Research Dev 64, 87–113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9400-y
- Online learning
- Computer mediated communication
- Asynchronous discussions
- Information visualization
- Interface design