Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An intervention framework designed to develop the collaborative problem-solving skills of primary school students

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable effort has been invested in innovative learning practices such as collaborative inquiry. Collaborative problem solving is becoming popular in school settings, but there is limited knowledge on how to develop skills crucial in collaborative problem solving in students. Based on the intervention design in social interaction of collaborative learning combined with the work from the cognitive and metacognitive processes of problem solving, we designed and incorporated an intervention framework for a collaborative inquiry project at primary schools in Shanghai. This framework aimed to develop the skills required to execute joint problem-solving tasks in students. Two classes with a total of 59 students participated in this 2-month experiment with an independently varied design. The results indicated that the students who received intervention gained in the main indicators of higher group skills and problem solving skills. The value of preparing group skills for students and the implications of supporting collaborative learning in school settings were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argelagós, E., & Pifarré, M. (2012). Improving information problem solving skills in secondary education through embedded instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Problem-based learning and argumentation: Testing a scaffolding framework to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 667–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., & Baines, E. (2007). Pupil grouping for learning in classrooms: Results from the UK SPRinG Study. Paper presented at symposium ‘International Perspectives on Effective Groupwork: Theory, Evidence and Implications’, American Educational Research Annual Meeting, Chicago, April 2007.

  • Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2012). Supporting problem-solving performance in a hypermedia learning environment: The role of students’ prior knowledge and metacognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1162–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballé, S., Daradoumis, T., Xhafa, F., & Juan, A. (2011). Providing effective feedback, monitoring and evaluation to on-line collaborative learning discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1372–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortez, C., Nussbaum, M., Woywood, G., & Aravena, R. (2009). Learning to collaborate by collaborating: a face-to-face collaborative activity for measuring and learning basics about teamwork1. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 25(2), 126–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, L. (2004). Research report: Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 677–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2003). Thinking together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1085–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Designing research-based instruction for story problems. Educational Psychology Review, 15(3), 267–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakostas, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2011). Enhancing collaborative learning through dynamic forms of support: the impact of an adaptive domain-specific support strategy. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27(3), 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershner, R, Warwick, P., Mercer, M., & Staarman, J. K. (2012). Primary children’s management of themselves and others in collaborative group work: ‘Sometimes it takes patience …’. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42(2), 201–216.

  • Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Nelson, D. W. (2005). Design of a cognitive tool to enhance problem-solving performance. Education Media International, 42(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). The transfer of problem-solving skills from a problem-based learning environment: The effect of modeling an expert’s cognitive processes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (2010). Highly integrated model assessment technology and tools. Education Technology Research and Development., 58, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Vanderhoven, E. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 59(1), 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. (1981). Manual for raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting problem-solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: Best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., Wolfe, C. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Engle, R. A. (1991). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms, 119–158.

  • Vye, N. J., Goldman, S. R., Voss, J. F., Hmelo, C. E., Williams, S. M., & Cognition, and Technology Group at v. (1998). Complex mathematical problem solving by individuals and dyads. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 435–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. (2002). Discussion on the basic concept of cooperative learning. Educational Research, 2002(2), 68–72 (in Chinese).

  • Wang, T., & Gao, Y. (1996). New Probe into the trend of modern teaching method reform. Educational Research, 1996(8), 66–69 (in Chinese).

  • Webb, N., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behaviour in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2006). A dialogic understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R., & Mansour, N. (2010). A dialogic approach to technology-enhanced education for the global knowledge society. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New Science of Learning (pp. 325–339). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 191–212). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., & Cheng, Z. (2007). Reflections on the deviation of cooperative learning in practice. Basic Education Research, 2007(5), 21–23 (in Chinese).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET) and partly supported by KISP, UNESCO Bangkok. We would like to acknowledge the teachers and students who participated in this study at the two schools in Shanghai.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Information Technology, East China Normal University, 3663 Zhangshan Road North, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Xiaoqing Gu, Shan Chen & Wenbo Zhu

  2. Department of Learning Technologies, College of Information, University of North Texas, UNT Discovery Park, G150 (G189), 3940 North Elm Street, Denton, TX, 76207-7102, USA

    Lin Lin

Authors
  1. Xiaoqing Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenbo Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoqing Gu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, X., Chen, S., Zhu, W. et al. An intervention framework designed to develop the collaborative problem-solving skills of primary school students. Education Tech Research Dev 63, 143–159 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9365-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9365-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation