Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Online case-based discussions: examining coverage of the afforded problem space

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Case studies hold great potential for engaging students in disciplinary content. However, little is known about the extent to which students actually cover the problem space afforded by a particular case study. In this research, we compared the problem space afforded by an instructional design case study with the actual content covered by 16 graduate students participating in an online case discussion. In addition, we examined prompts used by two instructors to both widen and deepen that coverage. Results showed that 86 % of the afforded problem space was covered during the week-long discussion, although problem-space components were not covered equally. To keep students focused on relevant case details, the instructors used a variety of prompts, accounting for 15 % of the total postings. Implications for research and practice are discussed including ways to use case mapping as both a teaching and analysis tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Albanese, M. A. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. (1994). Teaching and the case method (3rd ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1999). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. In J. Rankin (Ed.), Handbook on Problem-Based Learning (pp. 19–26). New York: Forbes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, S. (2009). Assessment of the impact of case studies on student learning gains in an introductory biology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(1), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K. (1988). Educational technology and school organization. In R. S. Nickerson & P. P. Zodhiates (Eds.), Technology in education: looking toward 2020 (pp. 231–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N. H., Jonassen, D. H., Yueh, H.-P., & Sanouiloua, M. (2000). Assessing a problem-based learning approach to an introductory instructional design course: a case study. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 60–83. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2000.tb00176.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Powerful learning: what we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSmet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: an exploratory study of online peer tutoring behavior. Computers & Education, 50, 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Gijselaers, W. H., Moust, J. H. C., Grave, W. S. D., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Vleuten, C. P. M. V. D. (2002). Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donner, R. S., & Harmon, B. (1999). Problem-based learning in american medical education. In J. Rankin (Ed.), Handbook on problem-based learning (pp. 11–18). New York: Forbes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droge, C., & Spreng, R. (1996). Enhancing involvement and skills with a student-led method of case analysis. Journal of Marketing Education, 18(3), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundis, S. (2014). Craig Gregersen: balancing a range of stakeholder interests when designing instruction. In P. A. Ertmer, J. A. Quinn, & K. D. Glazewski (Eds.), The ID CaseBook: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 204–208). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. A., Faux, R. B. (2006). Towards productive disciplinary engagement of prospective teachers in educational psychology: Comparing two methods of case-based instruction. Teaching Educational Psychology, 1(2). Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://vocserve.berkeley.edu/faculty/RAEngle/EngleFaux2006.pdf.

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Stepich, D. A. (2002). Initiating and maintaining meaningful case discussions: Maximizing potential of case-based instruction. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 12(2/3), 5–18.

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Stepich, D. A. (2005). Instructional design expertise: How will we know it when we see it. Educational Technology, 45(6), 38–43.

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Quinn, J. (2007). The ID CaseBook: Case studies in instructional design (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

  • Ertmer, P. A., Stepich, D. A., Flanagan, S., Kocaman, A., Reiner, C., Reyes, L., Santone, A., & Ushigusa, S. (2009). Impact of guidance on the problem-solving efforts of instructional design novices. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(4), 117–132.

  • Ertmer, P. A., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. J. (2011). Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 157–186.

  • Ertmer, P. A., Quinn, J. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2014). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

  • Flynn, A. E., & Klein, J. D. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 71–86. doi:10.1007/bf0250491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, R., & Annabi, H. (2006). How the teacher’s role changes in online case study discussion. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(2), 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitzmann, R. (2008). Case study instruction in teacher education: opportunity to develop students’ critical thinking, school smarts and decision making. Education, 128(4), 523–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7(1). Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol7/iss1/.

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 21–39. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol1/iss1/.

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., & Day, R. S. (2002). “It’s harder than we thought it would be”: a comparative case study of expert-novice experimentation strategies. Science Education, 86, 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(2), 95–110. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol5/iss2/.

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: a view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, H., Walker, A., Shelton, B. E., & Fitt, H. (2013). Exploring the relationships between tutor background, tutor training, and student learning: a problem-based learning meta-analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 7(1). Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol7/iss1/.

  • LeMaistre, C. (1998). What is an expert instructional designer? Evidence of expert performance during formative evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: the role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundeberg, M. A., & Yadav, A. (2006). Assessment of case study teaching: where do we go from here? (Part II.). Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(6), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, D., & Mynard, J. (2009). An analysis of higher-order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchem, K., Fitzgerald, G., Hollingsead, C., Koury, K., Miller, K., & Tsai, H.-H. (2008). Enhancing case-based learning in teacher education through online discussions: structure and facilitation. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, C. S. L., and Tan, C. (2006). Investigating Singapore pre-service teachers’ ill-structured problem-solving processes in an asynchronous online environment: Implications for reflective thinking. New Horizons in Education 54, 1–15. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ847602.

  • Paulus, T. M., Horvitz, B., & Shi, M. (2006). Isn’t it just like our situation? Engagement and learning in an online story-based environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, M. A., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem-based learning. Science Education, 95(1), 57–86. doi:10.1002/sce.20412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, R. S., & Emery, C. D. (1995). Designer thinking: how novices and experts think about instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, V. (1996). Choreographing a case class. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston. Ref. # 9-595-074.

  • Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students’ level of thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. (2008). Impact of case-based instruction on student teachers’ reflection on facilitating children’s learning. Action in Teacher Education, 30(1), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2003). Facilitating problem-based learning: illuminating perspectives. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M., & Wilkie, K. (Eds.). (2006). Problem-based learning online. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (2000). What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equation modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 7, 708–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., & Bransford, J. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K. (2007). Utilizing peer moderation in online discussions: addressing the controversy between teacher moderation and nonmoderation. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (2010). Professors’ use of case discussion leadership at Harvard and Darden MBA programs: characteristics of a successful case discussion. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(2), 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepich, D. A., Ertmer, P. A., & Lane, M. M. (2001). Problem solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 53–69.

  • Struck, B. D., & Teasdale, T. A. (2008). Development and evaluation of a longitudinal case-based learning (CBL) experience for a geriatric medicine rotation. Gerontology and Geriatric Education, 28(3), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G., & Byrd, T. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education, 18, 457–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik, A., & Jonassen, D. (2013). The effects of successful versus failure-based cases on argumentation while solving decision-making problems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: the computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1996). Computer and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1157–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A. (2008). What works for them? Preservice teachers’ perceptions of their learning from video cases. Action in Teacher Education, 29(4), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., & Barry, B. E. (2009). Using case-based instruction to increase ethical understanding in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., & Beckerman, J. L. (2009). Implementing case studies in a plant pathology course: impact on student learning and engagement. Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education, 38, 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based learning: influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). What students learn in problem-based learning: a process analysis. Instructional Science, 40, 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Strategic facilitation of problem-based discussion for teacher professional development. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 342–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., McConnell, T. J., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2010). Using questioning to facilitate discussion of science teaching problems in teacher professional development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 4(1), 57–82. Retrieved August 16, 2014, from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol4/iss1/5/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beering Hall of Liberal Arts and Education, Purdue University, 100 N. University St., West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2098, USA

    Peggy A. Ertmer & Adrie A. Koehler

Authors
  1. Peggy A. Ertmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adrie A. Koehler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peggy A. Ertmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ertmer, P.A., Koehler, A.A. Online case-based discussions: examining coverage of the afforded problem space. Education Tech Research Dev 62, 617–636 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9350-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9350-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation