Abstract
This paper examines gender differences related to Information and Communication Technology (ICT) literacy using two valid and internally consistent measures with eighth grade students (N = 1,513) from Florida public schools. The results of t test statistical analyses, which examined only gender differences in demonstrated and perceived ICT skills, indicate significant differences in all areas in favor of females. Females had higher factor scores in perception measures for Frequency of Computer Use, Perceived ICT Skills, and Attitudes toward Computers. In addition, female students had significantly higher scores on all six sections from the Student Tool for Technology Literacy, a performance-based assessment. These results counter many empirical research studies that show males generally perform better with ICT skills and have overall better attitudes toward computers than their female counterparts. However, when adding predictors to the model and using multilevel modeling statistical methods, findings indicate that gender was no longer significant. These findings question the importance of the gender differences related to ICT skills that were found with previous statistical examinations. Using more advanced statistical methods to answer research questions pertaining to ICT skills is important in order to determine which factors have the greatest potential for intervention programs that focus on developing equitable ICT skills and career choices for all students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbiss, J. (2009). Gendering the ICT curriculum: The paradox of choice. Computers & Education, 53(2), 343–354.
Ahn, J. (2011). Digital divides and social network sites: Which students participate in social media? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 147–163.
Alexander, P. (2003). The Development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.
Anderson, N., Lankshear, C., Timms, C., & Courtney, L. (2008). ‘Because it’s boring, irrelevant and I don’t like computers’: Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1304–1318.
Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74, 252–259.
Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., & Tahan, K. (2011). The Condition of Education 2011 (NCES 2011-033). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Barron, A. E., Hohlfeld, T. N., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2008). Final Evaluation Report: Student Tool for Technology Literacy (ST2L) Development and Pilot Test. Retrieved May 15, 2013 from http://www.flinnovates.org/docs/ST2LFinalEval.pdf.
Becker, H. J. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April, 2001. Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html.
Becker, J. D. (2006). Digital equity in education: A Multilevel examination of differences in and relationships between computer access, computer use and state-level technology policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 15(3). Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/51.
Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230.
British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA). (2008). How do boys and girls differ in their use of ICT? Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8318/1/gender_ict_briefing.pdf.
Bunz, U., Curry, C., & Voon, C. (2007). Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2321–2344.
Ertl, B., & Helling, K. (2011). Promoting gender equality in digital literacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 477–503.
Florida Department of Education (FLDOE), Office of Educational Technology. (2005). Florida STaR Survey Results: Fall 2004 Overview. Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://www.flinnovates.org/docs/FLStarSurveyReport200405.pdf.
Florida Department of Education (FLDOE), Research and Measurement, Division of Accountability. (2009). Florida School Indicators Report (FSIR) 2007–2008 [Data files]. Retrieved June 5, 2013 from http://www.fldoe.org/eias/eiaspubs/fsir.asp.
Hakkarainen, K., Ilomäki, L., Lipponen, L., Muukkonen, H., Rahikainen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2000). Students skills and practices of using ICT: Results of a national assessment in Finland. Computers & Education, 34(2), 103–117.
Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113.
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448.
Harper, V. (2003). The digital divide (DD): A reconceptualization for educators. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 11(1), 96–103.
Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1648–1663.
Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. E. (2010). Development and validation of the Student Tool for Technology Literacy (ST2L). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 361–389.
Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823–2837.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). Educational technology Standards for students. Retrieved June 15, 2012 from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students/nets-student-standards-2007.aspx.
International Society of Technology in Education (ISTE). (1998). NETS for students. Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets_for_students_1998_standards.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Ito, M., Horst, H. A., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stevenson, B., & Lange, P. (2008). White paper—Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. Chicago: The John P. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/report.
Kay, R. (2008). Exploring gender differences in computer-related behaviour: Past, present, and future. In T. T. Kidd & I. Chen (Eds.), Social information technology: Connecting society and cultural issues (pp. 12–30). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Gender differences in the use of laptops in higher education: A formative analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 361–380.
Kelan, E. J. (2007). ‘I don’t know why’—Accounting for the scarcity of women in ICT work. Women’s Studies International Forum, 30(6), 499–511.
Kim, M. C., & Kim, J. K. (2001). Digital divide: Conceptual discussions and prospect. Human Society and the Internet Proceedings (LNCS), 2105, 78–91.
Kinzie, M. B., & Joseph, D. R. D. (2008). Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: Implications for educational game design. Educational Technology and Research Development, 56(5–6), 643–663.
Koch, S. C., Müller, S. M., & Sieverding, M. (2008). Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1795–1803.
Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Examining instruction, achievement, and equity with NAEP mathematics data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(14) 1–30. Retrieved June 15, 2012 from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/85.
Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Meelissen, M. R. M., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 969–985.
Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “Digital Turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271.
National Science Foundation (2010). ADVANCE: Increasing the participation and advancement of women in academic science and engineering careers (ADVANCE) (NSF 10-593). Arlington, VA: The National Science Foundation. Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2010/nsf10593/nsf10593.pdf.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2011). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2011. Special Report NSF 11-309. Arlington, VA. Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD Publications.
Papastergiou, M. (2008). Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Computers & Education, 51(2), 594–608.
Papastergiou, M., & Solomonidou, C. (2005). Gender issues in Internet access and favorite Internet activities among Greek high school pupils inside and outside school. Computers & Education, 44(4), 377–393.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Sáinz, M., & Eccles, J. (2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 486–499.
Tien, F. F., & Fu, T. T. (2008). The correlates of the digital divide and their impact on college student learning. Computers & Education, 50(1), 421–436.
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements, and shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221–235.
Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Hüsing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. The Information Society: An International Journal, 22(5), 279–290.
Vekiri, I. (2010). Boys’ and girls’ ICT beliefs: Do teachers matter? Computers & Education, 55(1), 16–23.
Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1392–1404.
Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I., & Kuiper, E. (2005). New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education, 45(1), 35–55.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 43, 179–225.
Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., & Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562–588.
Wenglinsky, H. (2004). Closing the racial achievement gap: The role of reforming instructional practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(64) 1–22. Retrieved November 23, 2012 from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/219.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hohlfeld, T.N., Ritzhaupt, A.D. & Barron, A.E. Are gender differences in perceived and demonstrated technology literacy significant? It depends on the model. Education Tech Research Dev 61, 639–663 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9304-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9304-7