Abstract
Learning with instructional animations may overstretch limited working memory resources due to intense processing demands associated with transient information. The authors investigated whether explicit instructional advice coupled with a task-specific learner control mechanism (such as a timeline scrollbar) could facilitate the successful self-management of transient information. The effectiveness of a timeline scrollbar that allowed self-pacing and self-sequencing of animations was compared with computer-controlled animations. Experiment 1 demonstrated that a timeline scrollbar (with instructional advice on its strategic use) enhanced the retention of stroke sequences in writing Chinese characters. In Experiment 2, a timeline scrollbar was used in an integrated set of narrated animations dealing with complex scientific information. Retention and comprehension post-tests indicated that although a scrollbar accompanied by instructional advice in its use assisted novice learners, no such effect was found with participants who possessed higher levels of prior knowledge. The findings have implications for the formulation of criteria for the effective incorporation of learner control into the design of instructional animations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, S., & VanLabeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14, 241–255. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002.
Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 354–359. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.014.
Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 287–298. doi:10.1002/acp.1245.
Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 811–820. doi:10.1002/acp.1351.
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013.
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive e-learning environments: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 387–399. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9051-6.
Kalyuga, S. (2008). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 852–861. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.018.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 943–951. doi:10.1002/acp.1787.
Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147–158). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819.010.
Lowe, R. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X.
Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Principles for managing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signalling, redundancy, spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183–200). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819.010.
Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 169–182). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819.010.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811678.
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 11, 256–265. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.256.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.101.2.343.
Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 61–86. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469–508. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4.
Spanjers, I. A. E., Wouters, P., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 46–52. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.011.
Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457–466. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.457.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_17.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.
Young, J. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 17–27. doi:10.1007/bf02300538.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Professor Joe Wolfe for contributing the test materials for Experiment 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hatsidimitris, G., Kalyuga, S. Guided self-management of transient information in animations through pacing and sequencing strategies. Education Tech Research Dev 61, 91–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9276-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9276-z