Development of a personalized educational computer game based on students’ learning styles
In recent years, many researchers have been engaged in the development of educational computer games; however, previous studies have indicated that, without supportive models that take individual students’ learning needs or difficulties into consideration, students might only show temporary interest during the learning process, and their learning performance is often not as good as expected. Learning styles have been recognized as being an important human factor affecting students’ learning performance. Previous studies have shown that, by taking learning styles into account, learning systems can be of greater benefit to students owing to the provision of personalized learning content presentation that matches the information perceiving and processing styles of individuals. In this paper, a personalized game-based learning approach is proposed based on the sequential/global dimension of the learning style proposed by Felder and Silverman. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a role-playing game has been implemented based on the approach; moreover, an experiment has been conducted on an elementary school natural science course. From the experimental results, it is found that the personalized educational computer game not only promotes learning motivation, but also improves the learning achievements of the students.
KeywordsPersonalized learning Learning styles Educational computer games Game-based learning Adaptive learning
The authors would like to thank Mr. Li-Hsueh Yang for his assistance in developing the educational computer game. This study is supported in part by the National Science Council of the Republic of China under contract numbers NSC 99-2511-S-011-011-MY3 and NSC 100-2631-S-011-003.
- Bonanno, P., & Kommers, P. A. M. (2008). Exploring the influence of gender and gaming competence on attitudes towards using instructional games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 97–109.Google Scholar
- Chuang, T. Y., & Chen, W. F. (2009). Effect of computer-based video games on children: an experimental study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre http://www.lsneducation.org.uk/research/reports/.
- Collins, A. (1996). Design issues for learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
- Eck, R. V. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 16–30.Google Scholar
- Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.Google Scholar
- Harris, K., & Reid, D. (2005). The influence of virtual reality play on children’s motivation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
- Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., Hung, C. M., Yang, L. H., & Huang, I. (2012). A knowledge engineering approach to developing educational computer games for improving students’ differentiating knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01285.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hwang, G. J., & Wu, P. H. (2012). Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning research: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010, British Journal of Educational Technology. 43(l), E6–10.Google Scholar
- Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In National association of secondary school principals (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.Google Scholar
- Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning styles: Theory and practice. Reston: National Association of Secondary School Principals.Google Scholar
- Keefe, J. W. (1991). Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Malone, T. W. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivation computer games. Palo Alto: Xerox.Google Scholar
- Oblinger, D. G. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-based Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Provost, J. A. (1990). Work, play and type: Achieving balance in your life. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
- Reiff, J. C. (1992). Learning styles. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.Google Scholar
- Sancho, P., Moreno-Ger, P., Fuentes-Fernandez, R., & Fernandez-Manjon, B. (2009). Adaptive role playing games: An immersive approach for problem based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 110–124.Google Scholar
- Soloman, B. A., & Felder, R. M. (2001). Index of learning styles questionnaire. Retrieved August 4, 2011, from North Carolina State University, http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html.
- Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 2(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
- Tseng, S. S., Su, J. M., Hwang, G. J., Hwang, G. H., Tsai, C. C., & Tsai, C. J. (2008b). An object-oriented course framework for developing adaptive learning systems. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 171–191.Google Scholar
- Warren, S. J., Dondlinger, M. J., & Barab, S. A. (2008). A MUVE towards PBL writing: Effects of a digital learning environment designed to improve elementary student writing. Journal of Research on Technology and Education, 41, 113–140.Google Scholar
- Yien, J. M., Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Lin, Y. C. (2011). A game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning achievements in a nutrition course. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 1–10.Google Scholar