Skip to main content
Log in

An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study employed a case study design (Yin, Case study research, design and methods, 2009) to investigate the processes used by 5th graders to design and develop computer games within the context of their environmental science unit, using the theoretical framework of constructionism. Ten fifth graders designed computer games using Scratch software. The results showed students were able to design functional games, following a learning-by-design process of planning, designing, testing, and sharing. Observations revealed that game design led to opportunities for informal knowledge building and sharing among students. This, in turn, encouraged students to test and improve their designs. The findings support the conclusion that elementary students can develop programming concepts and create computer games when using graphical programming software developed for their level of experience. Insights into the iterative process of learning-by-game design are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 5(1), 86–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman, A., & Resnick, M. (1995). The MediaMOO Project: Constructionism and professional community. Convergence, 1(1), 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S. (2006). Assessing for deep understanding. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 205–221). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. (2009). Encouraging peer sharing: Learning reflections in a community of designers. In Y. B. Kafai, K. A. Peppler, & R. N. Chapman (Eds.), The computer clubhouse: Constructionism and creativity in youth communities (pp. 81–90). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2000). Alice: A 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts. In Proceedings of 5th Annual CCSC Northeastern Conference (pp. 28–29). Ramapo, NJ.

  • Dickey, M. (2005). Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computers and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Design, 53(2), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargarian, G. (1996). The art of design. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 125–160). Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., & Gabbitas, B. (2009). Re-examining cognition during student-centered, web-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 767–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as learning environment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Children designers: Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school (pp. 41–85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidou, A., Rader, C., Repenning, A., Lewis, C., & Cherry, G. (2003). Making constructionism work in the classroom. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8(1), 63–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. (1998). Video game designs by girls and boys: Variability and consistency of gender differences. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 90–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. (2006a). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. (2006b). Case-based reasoning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students’ science talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 323–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers and Education, 51, 1609–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., Yen, L., Yang, M., & Chen., L. (2005). Teaching computer programming in elementary schools: A pilot study. Presented at NECC, Taiwan. Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http://www.stagecast.com/pdf/research/Lin_NECC2005_Paper_RP.pdf.

  • Malan D. J., & Leitner, H. H. (2007) Scratch for budding computer scientists. SIGCSE 2007, Covington, KY.

  • Maloney, J., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: Urban youth learning programming with Scratch. SIGCSE 2008, Portland, OR, USA. Retrieved March 20, 2009 from http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Research.

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroy-Hernández, A., & Resnick, M. (2008). Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions, 15(2), 50–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overmars, M. H. (2004). Learning object-oriented design by creating games. IEEE Potentials, 23(5), 11–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993a). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993b). The children’s machine: Rethinking schools in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007a). What video game making can teach us about learning and literacy: Alternative pathways into participatory cultures. Tokyo, Japan: The Digital International Game Research Association Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007b). From SuperGoo to Scratch: Exploring creative digital media production in informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2008). Students as designers and creators of educational computer games: Who else? British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1004–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, A., & Ioannidou, A. (2008). Broadening participation through scalable game design. SIGCSE Bulletin, 1(40), 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P., Luke, N., & Smith, J. (1998). Project KID DESIGNER: Constructivism at work through play. Meridian: Middle School Computer Technology Journal, 1(1). Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/jan98/index.htm.

  • Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. Computers and Education, 50, 559–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefton-Green, J. (2003). Informal learning: Substance or style? Teaching Education, 13(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers and Education, 46(3), 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. (2006). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(3). Retrieved August 15, 2010, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol1_issue6/Changing_the_Game_What_Happens_When_Video_Games_Enter_the_Classroom_pdf.

  • Squire, K., Giovanetto, L., Devane, B., & Durga, S. (2005). From users to designers: Building a self-organizing game-based learning environment. TechTrends, 49(5), 34–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangdhanakanond, K., Pitiyanuwat, S., & Archwamety, T. (2006). A development of portfolio for learning assessment of students taught by full-scale constructionism approach at Darunsikkhalai School. Education, 13(2), 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiong, K., & Yong, S. (2008). Learning through computer game design: Possible success (or failure) factors. The 16th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 947–951). Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.apsce.net/ICCE2008/papers/ICCE2008-paper293.pdf.

  • Van Eck, R. (2006). Using games to promote girls’ positive attitudes toward technology. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(3). Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol2_issue3/Using_Games_to_Promote_Girls’_Positive_Attitudes_Toward_Technology.pdf.

  • Warren, S. J., Dondlinger, M. J., & Barab, S. A. (2008). A MUVE towards PBL writing: Effects of a digital learning environment designed to improve elementary student writing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research, design and methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Baytak.

Additional information

This work is based upon the doctoral dissertation completed by the first author at The Pennsylvania State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baytak, A., Land, S.M. An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 765–782 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9184-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9184-z

Keywords

Navigation