Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future research

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although online learning is expanding in availability and popularity, the high dropout rates remain a challenging problem. In this paper, we reviewed the existing empirical studies on online course dropouts in post-secondary education that were published during the last 10 years. We identified 69 factors that influence students’ decisions to dropout and classified them into three main categories: (a) Student factors, (b) Course/Program factors, and (c) Environmental factors. We then examined the strategies proposed to overcome these dropout factors: (a) understanding each student’s challenges and potential, (b) providing quality course activities and well-structured supports, and (c) handling environmental issues and emotional challenges. Finally, we discussed issues regarding dropout factors and strategies for addressing these factors and offered recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

*These references make up the 35 past empirical studies that we reviewed

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bocchi, J., Eastman, J. K., & Swift, C. O. (2004). Retaining the online learner: Profile of students in an online MBA program and implications for teaching them. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Castles, J. (2004). Persistence and the adult learner: Factors affecting persistence in Open University students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cheung, L. L. W., & Kan, A. C. N. (2002). Evaluation of factors related to student performance in a distance-learning business communication course. Journal of Education for Business, 77(5), 257.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Chyung, S. Y. (2001). Systematic and systemic approaches to reducing attrition rates in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Clay, M. N., Rowland, S., & Packard, A. (2009). Improving undergraduate online retention through gated advisement and redundant communication. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(1), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, D. P. (2002). Online drop rate revisited. The technology source, May/June. Retrieved from http://technologysource.org/issue/2002-05/.

  • *Drouin, M. A. (2008). The relationship between students’ perceived sense of community and satisfaction, achievement, and retention in an online course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Dupin-Bryant, P. (2004). Pre-entry variables related to retention in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, C., Morris, L. V., & Lee, K. (2009). Differences by course discipline on student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses of undergraduate general education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Frydenberg, J. (2007). Persistence in university continuing education online classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(1–2), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Holder, B. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 5–17). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2007). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1995). Open learning courses for adults: A model of student progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kemp, W. C. (2002). Persistence of adult learners in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers and Education, 48(2), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, GA: Sage Publications.

  • *Liu, S. Y., Gomez, J., & Cherng-Jyh, Y. (2009). Community college online course retention and final grade: Predictability of social presence. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Moore, K., Bartkovich, J., Fetzner, M., & Ison, S. (2003). Success in cyberspace: Student retention in online courses. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 10(2), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A system view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Morgan, C. K., & Tam, M. (1999). Unravelling the complexities of distance education student attrition. Distance Education, 20(1), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. (2005a). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Morris, L. V., Wu, S., & Finnegan, C. L. (2005b). Predicting retention in online general education courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2001). Barriers to distance education: A factor analytic study. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(2), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree-completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Osborn, V. (2001). Identifying at-risk students in videoconferencing and web-based distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., & Thomas, B. (2004). E-learning and retention: Key factors influencing student withdrawal. Education Training, 46(6/7), 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Parker, A. (1999). A study of variables that predict dropout from distance education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Parker, A. (2003). Identifying predictors of academic persistence in distance education. United States Distance Learning Association Journal, 17(1), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Perry, B., Boman, J., Care, W. D., Edwards, M., & Park, C. (2008). Why do students withdraw from online graduate nursing and health studies education? Journal of Educators Online, 5(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pierrakeas, C., Xenos, M., Panagiotakopoulos, C., & Vergidis, D. (2004). A comparative study of dropout rates and causes for two different distance education courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pigliapoco, E., & Bogliolo, A. (2008). The effects of psychological sense of community in online and face-to-face academic courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3 (4), 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Poellhuber, B., Chomienne, M., & Karsenti, T. (2008). The effect of peer collaboration and collaborative learning on self-efficacy and persistence in a learner-paced continuous intake model. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Rolfe, C. J. (2007). Getting the bugs out of the distance learning experience. College Quarterly, 10(3), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Rovai, A. P., & Wighting, M. J. (2005). Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Shin, N., & Kim, J. (1999). An exploration of learner progress and drop-out in Korea National Open University. Distance Education, 20(1), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tello, S. F. (2007). An analysis of student persistence in online education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2004). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Woodley, A., De Lange, P., & Tanewski, G. (2001). Student progress in distance education: Kember’s model re-visited. Open Learning, 16(2), 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Xenos, M., Pierrakeas, C., & Pintelas, P. (2002). A survey on student dropout rates and dropout causes concerning the students in the Course of Informatics of the Hellenic Open University. Computers and Education, 39(4), 361.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Virginia, Instructional Technology Program, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Youngju Lee & Jaeho Choi

  2. 499 Seymour Rd, APT #7, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA

    Youngju Lee

  3. 195 Wahoo Way, #522, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA

    Jaeho Choi

Authors
  1. Youngju Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaeho Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngju Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Choi, J. A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future research. Education Tech Research Dev 59, 593–618 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation