Abstract
Educational multi-user virtual environments (MUVEs) have been shown to be effective platforms for situated science inquiry curricula. While researchers find MUVEs to be supportive of collaborative scientific inquiry processes, the complex mix of multi-modal messages present in MUVEs can lead to cognitive overload, with learners unable to effectively process the rich information encountered in virtual space. In this study, we investigated the effect of communication modality on cognitive load and science inquiry learning in students completing a science inquiry curriculum in an educational MUVE. Seventy-eight undergraduate education majors from a large southwestern university participated in this control-treatment study. Significant positive results were found for reducing cognitive load for participants communicating through voice-based chat, although this reduction was not found to influence learning outcomes. We conclude that use of voice-based communication can successfully reduce cognitive load in MUVE-based inquiry curricula.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almond, R. G., Steinberg, L. S., & Mislevy, R. J. (2002). Enhancing the design and delivery of assessment systems: A four-process architecture. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(5), 3–63. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://escholarship.bc.edu/jtla/vol1/5/.
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzan, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–108.
Behrens, J. T., Mislevy, R. J., Bauer, M., Williamson, D. M., & Levy, R. (2004). Introduction to evidence centered design and lessons learned from its application in a global E-learning program. International Journal of Testing, 4, 295–301.
Bers, M. U. (1999, December). Zora: A graphical multi-user environment to share stories about the self. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL’99).
Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61.
Corbit, M. (2002). Building virtual worlds for informal science learning (SciCentr and SciFair) in the Active Worlds Educational Universe (AWEDU). Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environment, 11(1), 55–67.
de Jong, T. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312, 532–533.
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., & Reuss, K. (2002, October). Motivation, usability, and learning outcomes in a prototype museum-based multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
Dede, C., Salzman, M., & Loftin, R. B. (1996). The development of a virtual world for learning Newtonian mechanics. In P. Brusilovsky, P. Kommers, & N. A. Streitz (Eds.), Multimedia, hypermedia, and virtual reality: Models, systems, and applications (pp. 87–106). Berlin: Springer.
EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. (2005). From tin cans to the holodeck: The future of networking in higher education (IT Networking in Higher Education: ECAR Research Study 2). Washington, DC: Arthur C. Clarke.
Embretson, S. E. (1998). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3, 300–396.
Embretson, S. E. (2002). Generating abstract reasoning items with cognitive theory. In S. H. Irvine & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Item generation for test development (pp. 219–250). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
Embretson, S. E. (2005). Measuring human intelligence with artificial intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Pretz (Eds.), Cognition and intelligence (pp. 251–267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
Johnson, A., Moher, T., Cho, Y., Edelson, D., & Russell, E. (2004). Learning science inquiry skills in a virtual field. Computers & Graphics, 28, 409–416.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Light, J. L., Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1990). By design: Planning research on higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1–16). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Clark, R. C. (2007). Using rich media wisely. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 311–322). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 638.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Misha, S. (2002). A design framework for online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 493–496.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–67.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., Almond, R. G., Haertel, G., & Penuel, W. (2002). Leverage points for improving educational assessment. In B. Means & G. Haertel (Eds.), Evaluating the effects of technology in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Nelson, B. (2007). Exploring the use of individualized, reflective guidance in an educational multi-user virtual environment. The Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 83–97.
Nelson, B., & Erlandson, B. (2007, April). Multimedia design principles for learning in multi-user virtual environments. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Nelson, B., & Erlandson, B. (2008). Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: Reflection on design practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5–6), 619–641.
Nelson, B., & Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 265–283.
Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D., Clarke, J., Bowman, C., & Dede, C. (2005). Design-based research strategies for developing a scientific inquiry curriculum in a multi-user virtual environment. Educational Technology, 45(1), 21–27.
Normand, V., Babski, C., Raupp-Musse, S., Thalmann, D., Benford, S., Bullock, A., et al. (1999). The COVEN project: Exploring applicative, technical, and usage dimensions of collaborative virtual environments. Presence, 8(2), 218–236.
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 51–71.
Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive-load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 419–430.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.
Quest Atlantis. (n.d.). Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://atlantis.crlt.indiana.edu/.
River City Project. (n.d.). Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://muve.gse.harvard.edu/rivercityproject/.
Sadler, T., Barab, S., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391.
Sallnäs, E. (2005). Effects of communication mode on social presence, virtual presence, and performance in collaborative virtual environments. Presence, 14(4), 434–449.
Singh, A., & Acharya, A. (2005). Multiplayer networked gaming with the session initiation protocol. Computer Networks, 49, 38–51.
Singh, A., & Acharya, A. (2006). SPLAT: A unified SIP services platform for VoIP applications. International Journal of Communication Systems, 19, 425–444.
Slator, B. M., Hill, C., & Del Val, D. (2004). Teaching computer science with virtual worlds. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(2), 269–275.
Steinberg, L. S., Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., Baird, A. B., Callahan, C., DiBello, L. V., et al. (2003). Introduction to the biomass project: An illustration of evidence-centered assessment design and delivery capability. CSE Technical Report. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED483027).
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
Wallingford, T. (2005). What Is VoIP? Retrieved 7/24/2007, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2005/09/02/what-is-voip.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erlandson, B.E., Nelson, B.C. & Savenye, W.C. Collaboration modality, cognitive load, and science inquiry learning in virtual inquiry environments. Education Tech Research Dev 58, 693–710 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9152-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9152-7