The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of diagrams and time-compressed instruction on learning and learners’ perceptions of cognitive load. The following design factors, visuals (visuals and non-visuals) and time-compressed instruction (0%-normal paced, 25, and 50%) were presented to 216 university students to analyze learning in a multimedia environment. Participants listened to audio instruction of the heart and those in the visuals condition viewed 19 diagrams that corresponded to the verbal instruction. The dependent variables consisted of four achievement tests: drawing, identification, terminology, and comprehension. Review behaviors (back and replay buttons) and learners’ perceptions of cognitive load served as additional dependent variables. The results of this study indicate that listening to normal or moderately compressed (25%) instruction in a multimedia environment supports learning. At these speeds, cognitive load is not increased thus allowing learners to gain a conceptual understanding of the material.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Arons, B. (1992). Techniques, perception, and application of time-compressed instruction. In Proceedings presented at the conference, American voice i/o society (pp. 169–177). Retrieved April 1st, 2007, from http://coblitz.codeen.org:3125/citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/5993/ftp:zSzzSzftp.media.mit.eduzSzpubzSzbaronszSzTimeCompressionAVIOS92.pdf/arons92technique.pdf.
Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia (pp. 135–146). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Barron, A. E. (2004). Auditory instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 949–978). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Benz, C. R. (1971). Effects of time-compressed instruction upon the comprehension of a visual oriented television lecture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.
Bray, J. H., & Maxwell, S. E. (1982). Analyzing and interpreting significant MANOVAs. Review of Educational Research, 52, 340–367.
Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–170.
Cohen, B. H., & Lea, R. B. (2004). Essentials of statistics for the social and behavioral sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223–234.
Duker, S. (1974). Time-compressed instruction. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
Dwyer, F. M. (1965). An experimental evaluation of the relative effectiveness of selected visual illustrations in teaching science concepts to college freshmen. Unpublished Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Dwyer, F. M. (1972). A guide for improving visual instruction. Learning services, box 784. PA: State College.
Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. Learning services, box 784. PA: State College.
Dwyer, F. M., & Lamberski, R. (1983). The instructional effect of coding (color and black and white) in facilitating students’ information acquisition and retrieval. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 31, 9–21.
Eilam, B., & Poyas, Y. (2008). Learning with multiple representations: Extending multimedia learning beyond the lab. Learning and Instruction, 18, 368–378.
Foulke, E. A., & Sticht, T. G. (1967). The intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. In Proceedings of the Louisville conference on time compressed speech, United States (pp. 21–28).
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science, 32, 33–58.
He, L., & Gupta, A. (2001). Exploring benefits of non-linear time compression. In Proceedings presented at the ACM international conference on multimedia, Ottawa, Canada (pp. 382–391).
Heiman, G. W., Leo, R. J., & Leighbody, G. (1986). Word intelligibility decrements and the comprehension of time-compressed instruction. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 407–411.
Janse, E., Nooteboom, S., & Quene, H. (2001). Word-level intelligibility of time- compressed speech: Porsodic and segmental factors. The Netherlands, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics. Retrieved April 1st, 2007, from http://www.let.uu.nl/~Sieb.Nooteboom/personal/timecompressed.pdf.
Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 329–343.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371.
Koroghlanian, C. M., & Sullivan, H. J. (2000). Audio and text density in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(2), 217–230.
Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia (pp. 147–158). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lucking, R. A., Purcell, S., & Christmann, E. R. (2006). Can you podcast? Science Scope, 30(1), 16.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia (pp. 135–146). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R., & Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.
Mayer, R., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390–397.
Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self- explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806–813.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more materials results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 187–198.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389–401.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Monroe, A. H., & Ehninger, D. (1974). Principles and types of speech compression. Glenview, IL: Scott Foreman.
Moreno, R. (2006). When worked examples don’t work: Is cognitive load theory at an Impasse? Learning and Instruction, 16, 170–181.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Education Psychology, 87(2), 319–334.
Ollerenshaw, A., Aidman, E., & Kidd, G. (1997). Is an illustration always worth ten thousand words? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24(3), 227–238.
Olsen, J. S. (1985). A study of the relative effectiveness of verbal and visual augmentation of rate-modified speech in the presentation of technical material. Unpublished Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.
Orr, D. B. (1968). Time-compressed instruction––a perspective. Journal of Communication, 18(3), 288.
Orr, D. B., & Friedman, H. L. (1967). The effect of listening aids on the comprehension of time-compressed instruction. Journal of Communication, 17(3), 223.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287.
Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1969). Concrete-image and verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 279–285.
Pallant, J. F. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis with SPSS. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pastore, R. (2008). Students’ perception of podcasts in the classroom. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(12).
Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86.
Schnotz, W., & Kurschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 469–508.
Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. (2003). External and internal representations in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 117–123.
Sorden, S. D. (2005). A cognitive approach to instructional design for multimedia learning. Informing Science Journal, 8, 263–279.
Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stoten, S. (2007). Using podcasts for nursing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38(2).
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 351–362.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Taylor, S. E., Frankenpohl, H., & Pettee, J. L. (1960). Grade level norms for the components of the fundamental reading skills. EDL Research and Information Bulletin, 3.
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(4), 257–287.
Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.
Verhelst, W., & Roelands, M. (1993). An overlap-add technique based on waveform similarity (WSOLA) for high quality time-scale modification speech. Paper presented at the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Retrieved April 1st, 2007, from http://www.etro.vub.ac.be/Research/DSSP/Publications/int_conf/ICASSP-1993.pdf.
This paper was accepted under the editorship of Steven M. Ross.
About this article
Cite this article
Pastore, R.S. The effects of diagrams and time-compressed instruction on learning and learners’ perceptions of cognitive load. Education Tech Research Dev 58, 485–505 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9145-6
- Time-compressed instruction
- Multiple representations
- Cognitive load