Advertisement

Coping with mismatched courses: students’ behaviour and performance in courses mismatched to their learning styles

  • Kinshuk
  • Tzu-Chien Liu
  • Sabine Graf
Development Article

Abstract

Although learning styles are considered as an important factor in education, students often have to learn in courses that do not support their learning styles. A challenge for technology facilitated learning is therefore to assist and help students to cope with courses that do not match their learning styles by training and developing their less preferred skills. In this paper, the interactions between students’ learning styles, their behaviour, and their performance in an online course that is mismatched regarding their learning styles were analysed. The results show which learners need more help in mastering mismatched courses, help in getting a better understanding about how students with good performance record and poor performance record learn with respect to their learning styles, and provide information about how to identify learners who might have difficulties in learning based on their behaviour.

Keywords

Learning styles Student performance Mismatched courses Adaptivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of iCORE, Xerox and the research related gift funding provided to the Learning Communities Project by Mr. Allan Markin. The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSC 96-2520-S-008-007-MY2, NSC 097-2811-S-008-001-, and NSC 97-2631-S-008-003-.

References

  1. Bajraktarevic, N., Hall, W., & Fullick, P. (2003). Incorporating learning styles in hypermedia environment: Empirical evaluation. In P. de Bra, H. C. Davis, J. Kay, & M. Schraefel (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 41–52). Nottingham, UK: Eindhoven University.Google Scholar
  2. Botsios, S., Georgiou, D., & Safouris, N. (2008). Contributions to adaptive educational hypermedia systems via on-line learning style estimation. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 322–339.Google Scholar
  3. Briggs Myers, I. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, E., Brailsford, T., Fisher, T., Moore, A., & Ashman, H. (2006). Reappraising cognitive styles in adaptive web applications. In L. Carr, D. De Roure, A. Iyengar, C. A. Goble, & M. Dahlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the international world wide web conference (pp. 327–335). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carver, C. A., Howard, R. A., & Lane, W. D. (1999). Addressing different learning styles through course hypermedia. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42(1), 33–38. doi: 10.1109/13.746332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.Google Scholar
  8. Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1997). Index of Learning Styles questionnaire. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html.
  9. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the Index of Learning Styles. International Journal on Engineering Education, 21(1), 103–112.Google Scholar
  10. García, P., Amandi, A., Schiaffino, S., & Campo, M. (2007). Evaluating Bayesian networks’ precision for detecting students’ learning styles. Computers & Education, 49(3), 794–808. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graf, S. (2007). Adaptivity in learning management systems focussing on learning styles. Ph.D. thesis, Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
  12. Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2007). Providing adaptive courses in learning management systems with respect to learning styles. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of the world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (e-Learn) (pp. 2576–2583). Chesapeake, VA: AACE Press.Google Scholar
  13. Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2008). Analysing the behaviour of students in learning management systems with respect to learning styles. In M. Wallace, M. Angelides, & P. Mylonas (Eds.), Advanced in semantic media adaptation and personalization, series on studies in computational intelligence (Vol. 93, pp. 53–74). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graf, S., Kinshuk, & Liu, T.-C. (2008a). Identifying learning styles in learning management systems by using indications from students’ behaviour. In P. Diaz, Kinshuk, I. Aedo, & E. Mora (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 482–486). Santander, Spain: IEEE Computer Science.Google Scholar
  15. Graf, S., Liu, T.-C., & Kinshuk. (2008b). Interactions between students’ learning styles, achievement and behaviour in mismatched courses. In Kinshuk, D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, P. Isaías, & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age (pp. 223–230). Freiburg, Germany: IADIS Press.Google Scholar
  16. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1982). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey.Google Scholar
  17. Karagiannidis, C., & Sampson, D. G. (2004) Adaptation rules relating learning styles research and learning objects meta-data. In G. D. Magoulas & S. Y. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 136–145). Eidhoven, Netherlands: TU/e Pub.Google Scholar
  18. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Kuljis, J., & Liu, F. (2005). A comparison of learning style theories on the suitability for elearning. In M. H. Hamza (Ed.), Proceedings of the IASTED conference on web technologies, applications, and services (pp. 191–197). Calgary, Alberta: ACTA Press.Google Scholar
  20. Liegle, J. O., & Janicki, T. N. (2006). The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 885–898. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu, H., Jia, L., Gong, S.-H., & Clark, B. (2007). The relationship of Kolb learning styles, online learning behaviors and learning outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 187–196.Google Scholar
  22. Manouselis, N., & Sampson, D. G. (2002). Dynamic knowledge route selection for personalised learning environments using multiple criteria analysis. In M. H. Hamza (Ed.), Proceedings of the IASTED international multi-conference on applied informatics (pp. 351–605). Innsbruck, Austria: ACTA Press.Google Scholar
  23. Messick, S. (1976). Personal styles and educational options. In S. Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning (pp. 327–368). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Moodle. (2008). Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://www.moodle.org.
  25. Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., & Magoulas, G. D. (2003). Personalizing the interaction in a web-based educational hypermedia system: The case of INSPIRE. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(3), 213–267. doi: 10.1023/A:1024746731130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paredes, P., & Rodríguez, P. (2004). A mixed approach to modelling learning styles in adaptive educational hypermedia. Advanced Technology for Learning, 1(4), 210–215. doi: 10.2316/Journal.208.2004.4.208-0823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.Google Scholar
  28. Stash, N., Cristea, A., & de Bra, P. (2006). Adaptation to learning styles in e-learning: Approach evaluation. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 284–291). Chesapeake, VA: AACE Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing and Information SystemsAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Learning and InstructionNational Central UniversityJhongli CityTaiwan
  3. 3.Center for Teacher EducationNational Central UniversityJhongli CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations