Abstract
The focus of this study was to understand knowledge flows among teachers by examining what types of knowledge was shared by teachers, as well as what motivates or hinders teachers to share knowledge online. We examined an electronic mailing list (listserv) supporting a community of practice of literacy teachers. Data were gathered on the teachers in the listserv through online observations. Additional data were collected through semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 teachers. Findings suggest that two motives of community involvement––collectivism, and principlism appear to be the main motivators for knowledge sharers to share knowledge, while lack of knowledge and competing priority appear to be the main barriers. Practical implications for knowledge sharing and suggestions for future research are discussed. The findings of this study inform teachers, listserv moderators, teacher associations, as well as researchers of educational technology who are interested in knowledge sharing among teachers within communities of practice mediated by computer networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in online knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.
Banik, B. J. (1993). Applying triangulation in nursing research. Applied Nursing Research, 6(1), 47–52.
Barab, S., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J. A., Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71–96.
Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 429–445.
Biggam, J. (2001). Defining knowledge: An epistemological foundation for knowledge management. Paper presented at the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Boisot, M., & Griffiths, D. (1999). Possession is nine tenths of the law: Managing a firm’s knowledge base in a regime of weak appropriability. International Journal of Technology Management, 17, 662–676.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1996). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning, (pp. 58–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Budd, R., Thorp, R., & Donohew, L. (1967). Content analysis of communication. New York: Macmillan.
Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735.
Carroll, J. M., Choo, C. W., Dunlap, D. R., Isenhour, P. L., Kerr, S. T., MacLean, A., & Rosson, M. B. (2003). Knowledge management support for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 42–64.
Cheung, C. M. Y., Shek, S. P. W., & Sia, C. L. (2004). Online community of consumers: Why people are willing to contribute? Paper presented at the Eighth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai, China.
Ciborra, C. U., & Patriota, G. (1998). Groupware and teamwork in R&D: Limits to learning and innovation. R&D Management, 28(1), 1–10.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to do (Consortium for Policy Research in Education). National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475–487.
Davis, J. A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Denzin, N. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2003). Towards a typology of online communities of practice. Retrieved on November 11, 2005 from http://gresi.hec.ca/cahier.asp.
Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (2002). Factors contributing to teachers’ successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 480–488.
Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community-of-practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20–35.
Hara, N. (2007). IT support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 76–87.
Hazel, H. (2001). Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 139–146.
Heron, R., & Hammond, F. (2001). Partnerships and educational benefits in post graduate nursing education. Australasian Journal of Neuroscience, 14(2), 18–21.
Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(2), 282–292.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 45(1), 65–94.
Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H.I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated vs. face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology research and Development, 49(1), 35–51.
Keane, B. T., & Mason, R. M. (2006). On the nature of knowledge. Rethinking popular assumptions. Paper presented at the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Kiesler, S. (1986). The hidden messages in computer networks. Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 46–60.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lichtenstein, S., & Hunter, A. (2005). Receiver influences on knowledge sharing. Paper presented at the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Regensburg: Germany.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Shrewd investments. Science, 288, 819–820.
Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca NY: ILR Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Preece, J. (2004). Etiquette online: From nice to necessary. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 56–61.
Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., Edwards, J. E., & Thomas, M. D. (1996). Responses on computer surveys: Impression management, social desirability, and the big brother syndrome. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(2), 263–274.
Schlager, M. S., & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? The Information Society, 19(3), 203–220.
Sharratt, M., & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, 1(2), 187–196.
Snyder, W., Wenger, E., & Briggs, X. S. (2004). Communities of practice in government: Leveraging Knowledge for Performance. The Public Manager, 32(4), 17–21.
Soh, K. B. K. (1998). Job analysis, appraisal and performance assessments of a surgeon––A multifaceted approach. Singapore Medical Journal, 39(4). Retrieved on August 20, 2006 from http://www.sma.org.sg/smj/3904/articles/3904ra1.html.
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 27–44.
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258.
Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2003). Assessing motivation of contribution in online communities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets, 13(1), 33–45.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does:” Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155–173.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.
Wenger, E. (n.d.). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm on September 2, 2006.
Wenger, E., McDermont, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Yang, C., & Chen, L. C. (2007). Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? Journal of Information Science, 33(1), 95–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hew, K.F., Hara, N. Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Education Tech Research Dev 55, 573–595 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9049-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9049-2